Anonymous Categorically Denies Involvement In PSN Data Breach Hack

And the trials and tribulations of Sony continue apace. Yesterday, after blowing off a US Congressional hearing, Sony issued a statement via their blog claiming they’ve found evidence that the hacker group Anonymous was involved in the recent PSN hack and subsequent theft of the personal data of millions of members. Commenting on that allegation, we stated at the time that:

This could mean nothing. Anonymous denies any involvement with the recent hack or associated data theft, and they already brought PSN down a few weeks earlier via DDOS attack. That note could have been left during that initial attack…

As is usually the case this story continues to develop. Late yesterday, Anonymous issued a statement in response to Sony’s accusations, categorically denying any involvement whatsoever. Below is their statement in full:

For Immediate Distribution
Press Release
May 4, 2011
Anonymous Enterprises LLC (Bermuda)

Last month, an unknown party managed to break into Sony’s servers and acquired millions of customer records including credit card numbers. Insomuch as that this incident occurred in the midst of Anonymous’ OpSony, by which participants engaged in several of our standard information war procedures against the corporation and its executives, Sony and other parties have come to blame Anonymous for the heist. Today, in a letter directed to members of Congress involved in an inquiry into the situation, Sony claimed to have discovered a file on its servers, presumably left by the thieves in question, entitled “Anonymous” and containing a fragment of our slogan, “We are Legion.” In response, we would like to raise the following points:

1. Anonymous has never been known to have engaged in credit card theft.

2. Many of our corporate and governmental adversaries, on the other hand, have been known to have lied to the public about Anonymous and about their own activities. HBGary, for instance, was caught lying a number of times to the press, to the public, and to Anonymous itself (in this phone call, for instance, (…) CEO Aaron Barr makes a number of untrue statements regarding the intent of his “research,” claiming for instance that he never tried to sell the information to the FBI when e-mails acquired soon showed that he had been set to do just that; executive Karen Burke was also caught lying to Bloomberg about having not seen an incriminating e-mail that she had in fact replied to just a few days before). The U.S. Chamber of Commerce lied about not having seen the criminal proposal created by them for Team Themis; Palantir lied about not having any idea what their employees were up to; Berico publicly denounced a plan that they had actively engaged in creating; etc. There is no corporation in existence will choose the truth when lies are more convenient.

3. To the contrary, Anonymous is an ironically transparent movement that allows reporters in to our operating channels to observe us at work and which has been extraordinarily candid with the press when commenting on our own activities, which is why reporters prefer to talk to us for truthful accounts of the situation rather than go to our degenerate enemies to be lied to.

4. Whoever broke into Sony’s servers to steal the credit card info and left a document blaming Anonymous clearly wanted Anonymous to be blamed for the most significant digital theft in history. No one who is actually associated with our movement would do something that would prompt a massive law enforcement response. On the other hand, a group of standard online thieves would have every reason to frame Anonymous in order to put law enforcement off the track. The framing of others for crimes has been a common practice throughout history.

5. It should be remembered that several federal contractors such as HBGary and Palantir have been caught planning a variety of unethical and potentially criminal conspiracies by which to discredit the enemies of their clients. This is not a theory – this is a fact that has been reported at great length by dozens of journalists with major publications. Insomuch as that our enemies have either engaged in or planned to engage in false flag efforts, it should not be surprising that many of the journalists who have covered us, who know who we are and what motivates us – and who have alternatively seen the monstrous behavior of those large and “respectable” firms that are all too happy to throw aside common decency at the behest of such clients as Bank of America and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce – also have their suspicions that some capable party performed this operation as a means by which to do great damage to Anonymous in the public eye. Those who consider such a prospect to be somehow unlikely are advised to read about what was proposed by Team Themis in their efforts to destroy Wikileaks, and should otherwise take a few minutes to learn about COINTELPRO and other admitted practices by the U.S. intelligence community. The fact is that Anonymous has brought a great deal of discomfort to powerful entities such as Booz Allen Hamilton, Palantir, and much of the federal government; the Justice Department in particular is likely unhappy that our efforts revealed that it was they themselves who recommended the now-discredited “law firm” Hunton & Williams to Bank of America in order that the latter might better be able to fight back against Wikileaks. All of this is now public record, and anyone who finds it laughable that those or other entities may have again engaged in tactics that they are known to have engaged in in the past is not qualified to comment on the situation.

Anonymous will continue its work in support of transparency and individual liberty; our adversaries will continue their work in support of secrecy and control. The FBI will continue to investigate us for crimes of civil disobediance while continuing to ignore the crimes planned by major corporations with which they are in league.

We do not forget, even if others fail to remember.
We not forgive, even if others forgive our enemies for those things for which we are attacked.
We are legion, and will remain so no matter how many of our participants are raided by armed agents of a broken system.

We are Anonymous.

That’s heavy stuff.

Anonymous points out the numerous instances in which their foes have resorted to dishonest and borderline illegal means to attack them. Considering Sony’s behavior since PSN went down – indeed, considering their behavior after the PS3 root key was hacked – we’re not inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt. Are they lying about Anonymous? Maybe, but it’s just as likely they’re simply doing what is typical for large entities – trying to get their public fixated on a convenient target in hopes of making the problem go away.

Sony: nothing is going to make this go away except fixing PSN, and maybe actually answering the questions we keep flinging at you (without dodging them or providing obfuscating answers). We’ll keep you posted as the story inevitably develops.

Via the Daily Kos Anonymous page.

Join the Conversation   

* required field

By submitting a comment here you grant GameFront a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate or irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin's discretion.

1 Comment on Anonymous Categorically Denies Involvement In PSN Data Breach Hack


On May 6, 2011 at 8:17 am

Blaming Anonymous for your nightmares is a bit like blaming the bogeyman. It’s a bit futile to try and point a finger at something that, in the first place, has very little entity to begin with.

Anonymous is so decentralized that any so-called “spokesperson” coming out and saying something like this is sort of meaningless. The whole point of Anonymous is that it defies having any such entity. Any so-called hacker could be considered associated with Anonymous. Therefore, Anonymous is any hacker. It’s a bit silly when you think about it, but then again, so is Anonymous.

They damage has been done. Sony would do best to shut its mouth and quietly fix this . Placing blame at this point is a bit moot. And Antagonizing Anonymous is just begging for another hack. How many hacks does it take to knock some sense into them?