How to Build a PS4-Like Gaming PC for $600 (or Bust)

The Grand Total

The final total for all our hardware choices (which can be seen in this Newegg public wish list), is $636.93, and that includes the rebate on the MSI HD7850. That’s about 6.2 percent over the $600 target, and we’re walking away with some competent, future-friendly tech. The FX-8120 will keep you gaming and multitasking for years to come, and the AM3+ motherboard should also hang around for a while – knowing AMD’s love for keeping new CPUs compatible with older motherboard sockets keeps us hopeful, at least. The MSI HD7850 – and the three pieces of top-shelf software it includes – is a formidable card on its own, and can always double up once that next Christmas or birthday comes around. Opting for 8 GB of RAM seems to be the norm for PCs these days, too, so the only real compromise here is the 500 GB hard drive, which might seem a little skimpy compared to the 1 TB-plus drives you’re used to seeing in 2013.

Obviously, this budget rig isn’t going to tame the likes of Crysis 3 — not on Ultra settings at 2560 x 1600, anyway. But our build will run any game available right now, many on High setting presets, while playing Crytek’s latest at more…modest settings and resolutions. You should be able to squeak out 60fps on High Settings for Battlefield 3, too.

Once you factor in Windows 7 ($100), a mouse, and a keyboard, you’re looking at a final price of around $775. While it’s a serious bump up from the presumed $500-$600 PS4 price point, its upgradability, access to non-gaming applications, and ease of troubleshooting make up the difference.

Join the Conversation   

* required field

By submitting a comment here you grant GameFront a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate or irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin's discretion.

20 Comments on How to Build a PS4-Like Gaming PC for $600 (or Bust)

R.J.

On February 28, 2013 at 12:34 am

I’ve been waiting for an article like this. My current PC can run The Witcher 2 fairly well, but not nearly at the maximum, and with the announcement that The Witcher 3 will be on PS4, I’ve been giving serious thought to building a PC that runs The Witcher 3 at its maximum settings, so some sort of reference point to go from is greatly appreciated. While I plan on getting a PS4, I’ve played the first two Witcher games on PC, so I obviously need to finish it on PC.

Thanks, Game Front.

Tiagonal

On February 28, 2013 at 8:24 am

“The PS3 is going to be one of this year’s hottest gadgets” ??? There I got a miss. O.o

Anyway… have you all heard of the long forbidden conspiracy of grid gaming??? All revived by GaiKai.

Tiagonal

On February 28, 2013 at 8:39 am

Can’t wait for someone asking:

The cell processor was thought to be designed for grid computing. Though it didn’t happened apparently because of network stability issues and stuff, that was the end of the rumour. Then there was folding@home, to fire up some discussion in obscure forums about shared computing and PS3. And now, since GaiKai’s adquisition, GaiKai has started to say they’ve got their ‘datacenters’ to be spread everywhere in the world… GaiKai’s technology is based solely on software, this time Sony didn’t had to design specific hardware for the works, so… What if their ‘datacenter’ was in fact everybody’s console.. actually some say the greatest conspiracy cue is if the PS4 will have a pair of ethernet connectors… weird stuff. Anyway, if it was that way… would you share your hardware?… in ‘sleep’ mode, slowly consuming your internet bandwidth to share your processing power to others? Think about it, you don’t use your console 24/7… with just a pair of PS4 working together to process a game… it would make most of gaming rigs kneel, well.. what if there were thousands of clusters? O.o

Want to hear more? There’s more… a lot more…

Evernessince

On February 28, 2013 at 11:57 am

@Tiagonal

Don’t know if your comment was serious or not but that will never happen for a couple of reasons:

1) what if the owner has capped bandwidth? He’s gonna find out and investigate what is using
up all of it. Then Sony incures a class action lawsuit
2) Would you notice a slowdown on other devices? The answer is yes, unless you have really
fast internet. Again people will notice this.
3) It’s just plain illegal. It’s equal to a DDoS attack where you are using other Resources without
permission.

They could sneak a clause in the License agreement to allow them to do this but as EA has found
out in the past, it won’t end well for them.

Tiagonal

On February 28, 2013 at 1:49 pm

@Evernessince What amazes me from your comment is… even if you say it’s never gonna happen, you’re actually hinting that the whole scenario is possible. So, uhm.. Thanks? O.o

Devin Connors

On February 28, 2013 at 3:18 pm

@Evernessince and @Tiagonal

Thanks for the comments, guys.

I don’t see cloud gaming overtaking local gaming at any point in the near future. It’s an interesting technology, and it has some practical applications…streaming older titles (PS2, PS3), demos for new games, and a select few single-player experiences. Streaming on the PS4? Yes. Streaming multiplayer Killzone matches on the PS4? Probably not.

-Devin

Tiagonal

On February 28, 2013 at 5:56 pm

…and Devin loses two points of logical flappery:

One for missing the typo in “The PS3 is going to be one of this year’s hottest gadgets”.

Two for missing the breakshift paradigm of cloud datacenters vs. grid processing fragmentation.

Keep loosing points and you might become an IGN editor someday!

Devin Connors

On February 28, 2013 at 6:01 pm

@Tiagonal

You should proofread your own comments before critiquing my posts.

As far as cloud gaming in the triple-A gaming segment goes, I didn’t say it would never catch on — I said it wouldn’t catch on anyttime soon. Several years down the road, maybe, but not in 2013 or 2014.

Tiagonal

On March 1, 2013 at 8:52 am

@Devin Gamefront’s the only place I’m heard and taken relatively ‘serious’! Gotta thank that and this article is actually useful. That itself is preventing you from losing any pseudojelly points. Why so worried? (+1 +1 +1 +1) However… I’m unsure if you got the concept of two different cloud technologies, but you shouldn’t care anyway.. It’s like saying one day we’ll be hit either by an asteroid or a comet.

Still you’re beign unfair… I can’t edit back nor eliminate any comments. One should be able to do so, specially for comments after midnight… Those written almost wasted.

Phil Hornshaw

On March 1, 2013 at 9:05 am

@Tiagonal @Devin

I think last I heard the IT side of things was working on making comments editable or something. Soon we will all be free to delete our drunken comments to our hearts’ content.

Evernessince

On March 1, 2013 at 10:48 am

@Tiagonal

You’re taking things a bit too literal, loosen up a bit. I will delineate that when I said that hardware sharing would “never” happen, what I meant was that if it did, it would have a negative effect anyways. As you stated, I go on to say that later.

@Devin Connors
I would have to agree with the fact that cloud gaming will take time to catch on. Although, will it ever be viable to stream the most demanding games of the time and actually have it look as good as on your own PC? Unless internet bandwidth outpaces graphics improvements, games will continue to require more and more speed to stream. For many, it may never be a reliable alternative to physical hardware.

Wesker1984

On March 1, 2013 at 2:25 pm

A PC over a game console? No! Playstation for ever

TheDog

On March 1, 2013 at 3:07 pm

Yes Wisker, why would someone want to invest in something superior in ever way. Yes, let run on a machine that can’t be updated. Can’t be improved. Can’t hold a candle to it’s betters in any way, shape or form. The brilliance of you plan is astounding, yet so simple (like a fanboy mind I wont mention).
The fact is consoles are nothing more than cheap wanna be pc’s without an OS. They’ve got a motherboard, onboard sound chip, on board video chip (and as any pc gamer will tell you, video chips suck compared to a full card), ram, hd, disk drive and a cpu. Time to grow up and face the music.
The only thing consoles had going for them was price, and when they first come out, you can get a better pc for the money. You have to wait a couple years for a price drop before that even comes into play.

Reebook

On March 1, 2013 at 3:14 pm

I choose to console game over PC gaming. I accept that it has massive inherent inferiorities and disadvantages over PC gaming, and frankly I don’t care. I enjoy console gaming too much. That doesn’t mean I’ll get every console or accept everything that console developers do, or that I can never appreciate PC-only games. I just prefer to use a console for gaming, despite spending the rest of my time on a laptop. It’s just the way it is, and I don’t wish to change it. That probably makes me a bit foolish but it’s the way I feel. At least I’m able to accept the flaws of my chosen pastime, unlike I imagine Wesker does.

Devin Connors

On March 1, 2013 at 3:18 pm

@Evernessince

One step at a time, for sure. Latency management and graphics fidelity are the two biggest pieces of the pie, and both will take a lot of R&D to push towards being universally acceptable. I’m not sure if hardcore MP games (your Quakes, Counter-Strikes, etc.) will ever be cloud-based — the players in those games need every ms on their side.

Tiagonal, chamán de la lluvia

On March 1, 2013 at 4:24 pm

@Devin Connors

Blah.. ms are nimieties! I can blast you off anytime I want, I can predict all your movements… just set a date and I’ll match you in a Duel, Unreal Tournament 4 from Southamerica within OnLive. (The 30 mins free trial allows multiplayer). HA HA HA.. don’t tell me you’re either too slow or bandwidth capped for it…

TheDog

On March 1, 2013 at 7:36 pm

@Reebook Doesn’t make you anything. Just means thats what you like. Nothing wrong with that if that’s what you like. Just like prefering hamburgers to steak. Some people might find that odd, but what you like is what you like. Never wonder or worry about that. Just enjoy it.

Red Menace

On March 3, 2013 at 1:52 pm

I approve of build articles.

Dom

On December 17, 2013 at 4:24 pm

You never actually gave us building instructions you just gave us the parts and now I spent about $700 on parts I don’t know how to make it

JawaEsteban

On December 17, 2013 at 5:56 pm

@Dom
Assuming that you’re not trolling, have a friend (or acquaintence) who knows hardware show you how to do it. This is not a complicated rig to build. Single graphics card, no RAID, minimal peripherals, no liquid cooling etc.

In the unfortunate case that you have nobody in your social circle who knows what the inside of a PC is supposed to look like, there are literally dozens of step-by-step articles on Tom’s Hardware explaining how to put a PC together.