CISPA Passes House – Is it Time For Gamers To Panic?

Despite claims made by Representative Mike Rogers (R-Michigan) that CISPA enjoyed almost universal support – he crudely slurred opponents of the bill as nothing more than uninformed children – the fact is that a wide swath of tech industry entities and citizen advocacy groups opposed the law. The Electronic Frontier Foundation is an excellent resource for keeping track of those who oppose this legislation.

The good news, at least theoretically, is that while passage of the bill in both houses looks like a good possibility, President Barack Obama has issued a stern threat to veto the bill in its current form. Considering Obama’s record on certain civil rights issues, we should at no point take his veto for granted, but the White House’s official statement does appear to make his approval unlikely, even if the bill passes the Senate. The White House, according to the statement, “remains concerned that the bill does not require private entities to take reasonable steps to remove irrelevant personal information when sending cybersecurity data to the government or other private sector entities. Citizens have a right to know that corporations will be held accountable – and not granted immunity – for failing to safeguard personal information adequately.”

This is heartening, but we must note that one of the bill’s most ominous provisions – the inclusion of forms of copyright infringement in the definition of cyberterrorism – is not singled out for criticism by the Obama Administration. While recent amendments to the bill have stripped it of language that would have defined any copyright violation as cyberterrorism, the EFF notes that the bill’s current language allows for provisions that would protect “authorized restrictions on access.” This includes “proprietary information,” which would seem to enshrine DRM and other similar schemes under the banner of “national security”.

Now would be the time to contact your senators to let them know how you feel about CISPA. A full list of contact information can be found here. Thanks to the theater presented by the House of Representatives, we already know what to expect on the Senate floor: bad faith arguments and fearmongering. Knowing that fact in advance should be enough to convince you to remain polite and reasonable at all times when talking to your senator or their representatives. The more incensed and angry you sound, the easier it will be to write you off as merely another disgruntled citizen, and disregard whatever point you’re trying to make.

Given President Obama’s veto threat and the dysfunctional state of the US Senate, today’s passage of CISPA by no means guarantees the bill will become law. But even if it ultimately fails, we must remember that a CISPA defeat won’t make the problem go away. Our would-be informational overlords carry a quiver that is absolutely teeming with arrows. Fortunately, we’re dealing with the same legislative body that produced senator Ted “series of tubes” Stevens. Gamers and other tech-aligned citizens are obviously working with a serious advantage. That, if nothing else, gives hope we’ll eventually succeed.

Read more Ross Lincoln’s work here, and follow Ross and Game Front on Twitter: @rossalincoln and @gamefrontcom.

Join the Conversation   

* required field

By submitting a comment here you grant GameFront a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate or irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin's discretion.

18 Comments on CISPA Passes House – Is it Time For Gamers To Panic?


On April 18, 2013 at 1:03 pm

This means War.


On April 18, 2013 at 1:52 pm

Absolutely disgusting. The invocation of the Boston tragedy in particular makes the bile rise. I sometimes wonder how these people live with themselves, then I realize that many of these people have no understanding of how the real world works as they’ve demonstrated time and time again.


On April 18, 2013 at 2:02 pm

Write letters. The paper kind. The internet makes it so easy to create petitions and email campaigns that Congress pretty much ignores all electronic correspondence. However, it’s a rare congresscritter who’s not painfully aware that an individual willing to take the time to write a letter is an individual who cares enough about the issue to vote on it, and bring friends.

As always, polite and intelligent wording is essential. If you sound like a high school dropout with a Twitter addiction, expect to be ignored. Harsh/violent language will also get your letter circular-filed immediately, and may result in a visit from a representative of your local FBI office who will take a very uncomfortable interest in your personal affairs.

Paper, pens, and stamps, people. Let’s get on it.


On April 18, 2013 at 3:51 pm

The goal of increased communication for security is great and important, and yes it will obviously affect privacy. The only way around it is to get more granular in the rules, which one would think that means balancing privacy versus security. However it is impossible to keep such granular rules/laws up to date with technology without being vague or covering broad scopes, My experience in IT has taught me that.

But still, any mention of copywrite in a cyber security bill is bull and the bill should be scrapped. The fact that copywrite is in there just further proves how corrupt politicians really are. ing corporations should have no say what the . Their concerns of profits combined with corrupt politicians are causing a split on a bill that would otherwise help secure our critical computer controlled infrustructure.


On April 18, 2013 at 7:14 pm

Not much has changed. If you want to encourage companies to share data with you, why not take a more active stance toward such a goal instead of destroying what little privacy we have left while also opening the door to more corporate BS. This bill is going to allow companies to NOT guarantee your information will be safe with them and allow them to share personal information without any consent. Ad companies will like it, identity thieves will like it, the average joe will not.

This bill is beyond bad and I don’t think these representatives understand the gravity of what this bill bows in. This is an american speaking and I am tired of my government sticking it’s hand in everyone else’s “pot”, the era of big stick politics is over. Time to move on to issues that actually have a positive impact, like a civil works bill.


On April 19, 2013 at 7:07 am

Our national “leaders” are simply self serving fleshbags that look to benefit themselves while betraying the citizens, at least those citizens without offshore accounts.


On April 19, 2013 at 8:24 am

The US was already in terminal financial, moral, and liberal decline. The passing of this act, coupled with the defeat for tighter firearms checks, has merely increased the morphine dose.

I feel sorry for the majority of Americans who are being unfairly repressed by this pathetic corporate climate.


On April 19, 2013 at 9:23 am

America, leaders of the ‘free’ world. lol.


On April 19, 2013 at 10:26 am

This isnt law yet. Theres been a lot of crazy stuff that has passed in the house over the yrs. It still has to go through the senate and obama said he’ s favoring a veto if it even gets to him. I personally feel it going no where.


On April 19, 2013 at 11:20 am

Always like Ross’ articles.

I would say that this sort of political behavior isn’t surprising (legislation based on misguided understanding), after all this is the same country that banned alcohol 100 years ago. This is a bought congress it’s been that way for years. Seeing at how-shockingly anti-consumer this bill is, is perfect evidence of that. I’m not one to don the tinfoil hat, but I mean come on. Quite honestly with how easy reddit and 4chan and Anonymous drag up “evildoer’s” information, the U.S. government and their vast amount of resources can’t spot “cyber threats” in a way that doesn’t involved infringing on our rights as netizens?

Sadly, the younger ‘digital’ generation will respond simply by posting facebook and twitter statuses believing that it will actually bring about change.


On April 19, 2013 at 11:47 am

I can’t believe that this bill has gotten this far again, it feels like last year’s fight all over again. This is seriously the time for people to start standing up and telling their senators just how strongly they oppose CISPA. If you go to this site you can find the number and email address for your states senators. If you want to fight back against this mess of a bill then you should really consider calling up your senators and telling them why your so opposed to the CISPA bill and then send them an email. Many representatives never received a single phone call about this monstrosity. Even if making these phone calls doesn’t work we could least say that we tried to stop this thing.


On April 19, 2013 at 6:08 pm

Who cares, your information is all over the internet for anyones use whether you like it or not. And if it’ll stop another Boston Marathon, Sandy Hook, VT, Columbine than all the better.

Diet Croak

On April 20, 2013 at 2:51 am

‘lol’ – your attempts at trolling have lost all impact because you don’t show any subtlety or restraint. Nobody on here even believes that YOU believe this crap anymore. It’s time you found another site to attempt to irritate if you’re not willing to provide intelligent debate on this one. Either that or go outside.

Red Menace

On April 20, 2013 at 5:27 pm

Call your Senators.


On April 22, 2013 at 7:28 am

Gosh. Terrible thing, isn’t it, to invoke an actual terrorist attack, by, y’know, actual terrorists, when debating an anti-terrorist bill?

Certainly nothing like the two months we’ve spent listening to The Usual Suspects waving the bloody shirt of Sandy Hook in a doomed effort to pass civil-liberty-infringing laws that–by the admission of their own authors–would have done absolutely nothing to stop that event.

Live by the bloody shirt, die by the bloody shirt. Get over it.


On April 22, 2013 at 8:55 am

Why even bother writing to your congress. They have been out of touch with the people for a very long time. Example at least 86 percent of Americans wanted universal background checks but Congress turned them down. If they can’t listen to 86 percent of Americans then what makes you think they will listen to us?


On April 22, 2013 at 9:51 am

If you consider that polling data shows the average NRA member is over 5 times more likely to have written a letter to or called their congresscritter than the average gun control supporter, you can answer your own question.

Congress works on cold election math, ethics has absoutely nothing to do with it. The average American voter has the attention span of a gnat, historically, and an extremely short memory. Congress doesn’t care if a majority of the public is screaming about an issue right now, they care about how many of those same people are A) still going to be screaming about it in November 2014/2016 and B) will be upset enough at the time to vote on it even if offered some other distraction.

For the issue you mentioned (without taking a position myself, as that’s a topic for a different forum), consider that it’s only been a few months since the Newtown shooting and overall public support for gun control (overall, not specific provisions) has already dropped more than 20 points. Like I said, really short memory. Now, extrapolate that trend a year and a half forward, and you’ll understand why Congress voted the way it did.

Compound that further by the fact that NRA members, through their very high rate of letter-writing/calls, have made it very clear to their respective congresscritter that they are single-issue voters. By ‘single-issue’, I mean that the voter uses one issue (gun control, abortion, immigration etc. etc.) as the overriding factor when they actually vote. Single-issue voters have long memories, and they can’t be bought off (generally). A single issue voter would elect Attila the Hun as long as he agreed with them on, say, abortion for example. Now, you take a room full of democrats and offer them immigration reform or rights in exchange, and support for gun control absolutely splinters. Plenty of polling data to back that up, by the way. On average, they’re much more of a multi-issue voting block.

In this case, we as gamers should take a page from the NRA’s playbook. Make it known to your congresscritter that you are a single-issue voter on electronic privacy/freedom. The best way to do that is to write.


On April 22, 2013 at 10:33 am

The reason why I feel that we should not bother trying is because I have lost faith in congress to get anything done. Not to mention they are out of touch for nearly a hundred years. Don’t believe me just look up some views congress made about rape.