Diablo 3 Beta Graphics Guide

Shadow Quality

That Barbarian must be a vampire, because he’s not casting a shadow. This is what Diablo 3 looks like with Shadow Quality set to “Off.”

Here you can see the “Medium” Shadow Quality setting. There’s a discernable shadow underneath the Barbarian’s legs, but it looks like an amorphous blob.

That’s better. The “High” setting provides everything you’d ever want in a shadow: sharpness and blackness.

Texture Quality

Only two settings here, but you can spot a clear different if you have sharp eyes. Pay attention to the difference in the guard’s armor between this shot (“Medium” Texture Quality)

And this one (“High”)

See how much sharper that chest-piece looks! Fancy textures FTW!


In these shots, I attempted to capture three different strata of Diablo 3 graphics. The first two pictures show the game at its lowest possible resolution (1024×768), with all the settings turned down as low as they can go. As you can see, thanks to Blizzard’s thoughtfulness, the game still doesn’t look half bad. The second pair of pictures is at medium resolution, with medium settings, looking quite presentable. The final two are at max resolution with all the settings turned all the way up.


Hope this sheds some light on Diablo 3′s graphics settings and makes it easier to plan potential upgrades. Check out rest of our Diablo 3 coverage — The Top 5 Biggest Changes, a Story Update, and screenshot galleries for the Monk, Demon Hunter, Wizard, Barbarian, and Witch Doctor.

Join the Conversation   

* required field

By submitting a comment here you grant GameFront a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate or irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin's discretion.

9 Comments on Diablo 3 Beta Graphics Guide


On September 24, 2011 at 9:13 am



On September 24, 2011 at 9:34 am



On September 24, 2011 at 10:31 am

Blizz has come out and said there will be many more setting on release of the game then are in the beta.

Sc2 looked like ass when it was in beta too.


On September 24, 2011 at 12:22 pm

“Triple Buffering, Anti-aliasing, and Physics Quality are all designed to improve frame-rate.”

Seriously, do not write anything more about games until you actually understand the pro’s & con’s of in game quality settings.


On September 24, 2011 at 12:53 pm

“Havok-powered physics”

they ditched Havok quite some time ago and rolled their own, might want to change that :D


On September 25, 2011 at 1:47 am

maybe test it on a lower spec machine, one that actually might struggle with the sytem req’s? then you’d see what the sliders are for


On September 25, 2011 at 5:44 am

@Jackovas – Seconded! In fact, I’ll give it a go:

1. Screen Res – Easiest setting to change, also one of the more noticeable on performance, but also screen quality. Turning this low can cause jagged edges across the entire display. If you have a mid-to-low cpu, the res can be a drag, as it requires more time to be calculated before the final render can be drawn on screen.

2. Texture Quality – Less of an issue these days, most modern pcs can handle the highest texture setting, as it is just a larger texture bitmap stored in the buffer. Might be worth turning down if you are low on RAM or your graphics card is very very old. Or a media chipset ;)

3. Shadow Quality – Always a drag on the cpu, but most modern gpu’s try to shift the workload onto themselves instead. Turn this down if you notice low FPS on scenes with a lot of volumetric lights & actors (characters, trees, buildings etc).

4. Physics – Modern Nvidia cards have dedicated PhysX drivers, so the GPU will handle this, no need to turn this down. ATI users might want to turn this off altogether if you have an old card and slow cpu. Not recommended to let the cpu handle this, as it has a lot to do already!

5. FSAA – Handled by gpu. If you have an old graphics card, turn this off, as there is little difference in fps when switching between 2x, 4x, and 8x. 16x and 32x are a whole difference kettle of fish, don’t turn on without the latest and greatest graphics card, or sli/crossfire config.

6. V-sync – This will make an impact if the gpu cannot keep up with the cpu (or even vice-versa). I won’t go into specifics, but turn this off if you have either a weak processor or graphics card. Only turn on with a powerful cpu AND gpu.

7. Triple buffering – Turn this on if you have v-sync enabled, as this can improve performance. It sends the scene through the back buffer several times to stop the processing/front-buffer de-sync, but only on OpenGL (and I suspect Diablo 3, being on Mac and PC, will be OpenGL rather than Direct3D).

8. Cluster density/distance – This is, for lack of a better explanation, the amount of particle effects and complexity at which they’re brought into the scene. Turn this down if you have little RAM (not much space to store the particles drawn) and weak cpu (to calculate multiple moving particles).

Hope the above explains the settings well enough. For more information on these settings (but for other games, so YMMV) see http://www.tweakguides.com/

Ben Richardson

On September 30, 2011 at 6:49 pm

@Jakovas, utopiav1

Anti-aliasing made it into that sentence via a typo, since corrected. I’m clearly not as knowledgeable at utopiav1 (thanks for the detailed information, dude!), but I like to think I’m not THAT dense. Turning on Triple Buffering and turning down Physics Quality will improve frame-rate in a hypothetical, generalized case, no?


Thanks for catching the error regarding the Havok physics (also fixed). Obviously, I referred to an out-of-date source; Blizzard started off using Havok physics, but eventually switched to a proprietary physics engine.

If you think about it, isn’t that kind of a microcosm for the way Blizzard operates as a company? Take something that’s already established and popular (Warhammer, say, or the Alien franchise) and repackage/appropriate it in a way that takes advantage of its best features but trims off the fat, making it ineffably more fun and accessible. I would be curious to hear from someone at Havok how much of Blizzard’s “in-house” physics engine simply borrows Havok’s most effective ideas and improves on them in small, Diablo-specific ways.

diablo 3 beta|diablo 3 beta key|diablo3 beta|diablo3 beta key

On December 16, 2011 at 9:44 am

Great post. I was checking constantly this blog and I’m inspired! Extremely useful information specially the last part :) I handle such info a lot. I used to be seeking this particular info for a long time. Thanks and good luck.