Posted on January 11, 2008,

Gaming Today Impressions Of TimeShift

timeshift-xbox-pc.jpg

Timeshift
Developer: Saber Interactive
Publisher: Sierra Entertainment
Price: $59.99 (XBox 360, PS3), $49.99 (PC)
Platform: PC, XBox 360, PS3
Category: Shooter
ESRB Rating: M for Mature: Blood & Gore, Intense Violence, Language
Release Date: October 30, 2007

TimeShift may have simply been released at the wrong time. Had it come out before we knew about Halo 3 and Call Of Duty 4, I’m sure the game would have received a lot more attention. TimeShift was released in late October and I am just getting around to it now due to the fact that Halo 3 and COD 4 were enough to keep my love of FPS gaming busy. Perhaps I skipped the game initially due to the less than stellar reviews it was receiving across the board. Were most of the reviews wrong? I wouldn’t say they were completely wrong, but they didn’t give the game a fair chance either.

TimeShift is certainly flawed, but it exceeded my expectations. What I saw of the game in the development phase is not the game that was finally released. The final product was polished and definitely a game worth playing. The game looks good in most parts and fantastic in a few areas. While it’s not on the same level as a couple other FPS hits we’ve seen in the past few months, TimeShift is certainly a good game.

The gameplay is fresh in some areas and introduces some interesting ideas when it comes to controlling time. In the game, you can basically pause, rewind and fast-forward time in short bursts to get through some tricky areas. It reminds me of what we saw in Enter The Matrix for the original Xbox. Unfortunately Enter The Matrix was also a game that received some very low scores from critics at the time it was released, even though I enjoyed that game too. The idea of manipulating time is nothing new with video games, but TimeShift has improved on the concept a bit. I’m looking forward to seeing where the next time shifting game takes us. What really separates TimeShift from earlier games is the ability to reverse time which I had not seen before. Pausing time can be great fun as well. If you are good with timing, you can pause time, steal a weapon out of an enemies hand and kill him with his own weapon. Campaign mode is great fun for a few days and probably better than the campaign we saw in Halo 3, so TimeShift wins in that category versus the giant Halo. I wish that the time shifting aspect was a little more in depth and more of a background story to go along with the campaign would have been nice.

Where TimeShift really shines is the multiplayer arena. For the longest time, the Halo series was my favorite game to play online with friends, but TimeShift may actually be more fun. In multiplayer, time shifting is a little different, but really adds a dimension of strategy that can’t be found in other FPS games. While in multiplayer, you must throw “chrono grenades” where anything caught in their explosion radius are temporarily slowed down in time. The game types included are death match, team death match, one-on-one, CTF and variants of each.

In the end, I’m saying that this is a great game to pick up for any FPS fan. It’s not going to match up with Halo 3, COD 4 or The Orange Box in many areas, but it’s equal and superior in others. If you enjoy multiplayer FPS games, it’s certainly worth a shot. If I had more friends interested in TimeShift, I’d probably be playing it all the time. TimeShift was simply a victim of being released at the wrong time. I also feel that most reviews were not fairly judging the title. It may not be the best, but it’s still a good game.

Check out the official 1UP Network review at 1UP.com

Join the Conversation   

* required field

By submitting a comment here you grant GameFront a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate or irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin's discretion.

6 Comments on Gaming Today Impressions Of TimeShift

da soc

On January 11, 2008 at 12:59 pm

Beating Halo 3 in terms of the quality of a campaign is no big feat. XD

Good review. I doubt I’ll pick it up, but I’ll keep it in the back of mah mind.

Joelteon7

On January 11, 2008 at 2:10 pm

^I personally preferred Halo 3′s campaign to its multiplayer. I generally did prefer Halo’s story and lore over the multiplayer part (which feels a bit UT/Quake at times, which of course isn’t bad).

This game sounded really great when I saw previews of it, but the mediocre reviews I saw dotted around the place and the fact I saw it in several shops simply not selling didn’t bode well with me, however, it did and still does interest me. Perhaps when it is bargain bin, I shall get it, as I already have too many shooters as is.

William

On January 11, 2008 at 2:56 pm

Joelton7, I’m sure it will be at bargain price real soon… probably another month or two. It really is a fun game that you’d probably enjoy. I definitely feel like the widespread negative reviews of the game were a little too harsh.

William

On January 11, 2008 at 2:57 pm

I’m also surprised you enjoyed the Halo 3 campaign. Most people I know did nothing but complain about it. I’m always trying to find someone interested in running through some levels in cooperative campaign.

Kareem

On January 12, 2008 at 4:07 am

The other games have big and recognizeable names and TimeShift is a complete unknown. Whoever decided to release it along with COD4, Orange Box, etc is a complete idiot. With gamers pockets empty from spending their cash on big name sequals many people will overlook and forget TimeShift. Had they released this maybe earlier or even later it would have done better.

I have gone to fry’s electronics a lot in the past couple weeks and all the copies of COD4 moved (sold out actually) and there is still tons of copies of TimeShift left. It’s kinda sad cause its not a bad game. It may not be OMFG 10/10 WTF BBQ awesome revolutionary, but not bad.

William

On January 13, 2008 at 12:12 pm

Kareem, originally TimeShift was supposed to be released much earlier.. they decided to delay it to improve the game, which was a good decision.. I think it was just unfortunate that they were not able to improve the game prior to COD4 and Halo. Had this been released in early to mid 2007, it would have been a hit.