Insomniac's Recruitment Music Video Drops Hints About Resistance 2?

Insomniac Games, developers of Resistance: Fall of Man and the Ratchet and Clank series, recently released this recruitment video to encourage more people to join their studio. The video itself is just hilarious on its own (and oddly catchy), but try looking a bit closer. Did that computer screen just read “12 new Chimeran Enemies?” And more importantly, does that one screen say “0708?” Could that mean we can expect to see Resistance 2 gracing store shelves as soon as this summer? Why must you tease us, Insomniac? Still, that’s a pretty cool music video. Makes me wish Pop-Up Videos was still on the air.

Via G4TV

Join the Conversation   

* required field

By submitting a comment here you grant GameFront a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate or irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin's discretion.

15 Comments on Insomniac's Recruitment Music Video Drops Hints About Resistance 2?

carg0

On February 21, 2008 at 1:09 am

Insomniac Games: mediocrity defined.

Norbit

On February 21, 2008 at 5:52 am

carg0 said: “Insomniac Games: mediocrity defined”

Mediocrity – ‘the state or quality of being mediocre’

Mediocre – ‘of only ordinary or moderate quality; neither good nor bad; barely adequate’

OK, lets take a look at their back catalogue;

Resistance Fall Of Man (PS3)
IGN rating – 9.1

Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction (PS3)
IGN rating – 9.4

Ratchet: Deadlocked (PS2)
IGN rating – 8.8

Ratchet & Clank: Up Your Arsenal (PS2)
IGN rating – 9.6

Ratchet and Clank: Locked and Loaded (PS2)
IGN rating – 9.4

Ratchet & Clank (PS2)
IGN rating – 9.2

Disruptor (PS1)
IGN rating – 8.0

Spyro the Dragon (PS1)
IGN rating – 9.0

Spyro 2: Ripto’s Rage (PS1)
IGN rating – 8.8

Spyro: Year of the Dragon (PS1)
IGN rating – 9.1

That means the average rating for an Insomniac Games title is 9.04.

‘Mediocre’? I think ‘consistently excellent’ is a more subtitle description.

Ivan_PSP

On February 21, 2008 at 7:41 am

Insomniac Games is perfect video game maker with every game having great review is EXCELLENT mot Mediocre.

Interweb Master

On February 21, 2008 at 8:39 am

@ Norbit, you pwned that loser, good job!

Interweb Master

On February 21, 2008 at 8:41 am

@ Norbit, also, don’t forget that Insomniac Games have been voted in the top 10 best small companies to work for the last 3 years.

carg0

On February 21, 2008 at 9:06 pm

“I think ‘consistently excellent’ is a more subtitle description.”

did you mean “suitable”, little boy?

great use of selective judgement. pay attention now, little boy, school’s about to start. let’s find out why that line of reasoning doesn’t work.

Resistance Fall Of Man (PS3) Jolt UK rating – 77%
Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction (PS3) Gamespot rating – 75%
Ratchet: Deadlocked (PS2) EGM rating – 73% or Gaming Age rating – 60%
Ratchet & Clank: Up Your Arsenal (PS2) TotalVideoGames rating – 70%
Ratchet & Clank: Going Commando (PS2) Edge Magazine rating – 70%
Ratchet & Clank (PS2) GameSpy rating – 78%
Disruptor (PS1) GameSpot rating – 70%
Spyro the Dragon (PS1) PSM rating – 80%
Spyro 2: Ripto’s Rage (PS1) Next Generation rating – 60%
Spyro: Year of the Dragon (PS1) EGM rating – 81%

That means the average rating for an Insomniac Games title is 72%

uh-oh…or dear, i’ve probably gone and upset you haven’t i. see, this is what happens when one, who doesn’t know how to properly debate, engages with another who does. i guess that would make you un”subtitle”, huh? :cry:

Hale

On February 21, 2008 at 9:41 pm

@ carg0, actually, it is your line of reasoning that is flawed.
Norbit chose ratings from one site, thus making the verdict fair.
You however, seem to have spent the last several hours scouring the internet for the lowest possible scores for the games presented. This is what we call selective reasoning. All of your sources are from multiple sites and thus not fair.
I think it is you that must go back to school.

Also, if you consider yourself such a master debater, then why did you start a flame war by posting something without backing it up. And then when Norbit presented a counter arguement to your statement, you don’t even address the issues he raised and instead attack his method? WOW, just wow.

Are yo going to correct my spelling too?

HATER

On February 21, 2008 at 9:49 pm

Perfect grammar, spelling, and a legitimate opinion. Oh yeah, I win.

Interweb Master

On February 22, 2008 at 7:33 am

The intelligence of xbox fanboys revealed and personified within the jumbled ramblings of “HATER”

@Gaming Today, why do these type of comments go through?

Interweb Master

On February 22, 2008 at 7:34 am

or is carg0 actually HATER?

Interweb Master

On February 22, 2008 at 7:43 am

@ HATER, actually numnuts, there is nothing gramatically correct about your ramblings. And if thats what you constitute as a legitimate opinion then I think you and Hitler would get along just fine.

Shawn Sines

On February 22, 2008 at 8:28 am

@Interweb Master: Because he didn’t cross the line and we allow people have opinions. We avoid censorship and while Hater’s comments may be in bad taste they are not in and of themselves bad. (Though his language does push it a bit and is likely to get some of his comments removed.)

Interweb Master

On February 22, 2008 at 8:45 am

@ Shawn, thats what I meant, opinions are fine, especially ignorant ones because they are fun to refute, but it’s the language that bothers me the most.

Ron Whitaker

On February 22, 2008 at 9:35 am

@Interweb Master: Comments with excessive profanity are either edited or removed.

@HATER: There is always a better way to express your opinion than vitriolic, profanity-laced rants. These types of comments will continue to be removed.

Interweb Master

On February 22, 2008 at 9:51 am

Aww, now my comments don’t make any sense, lol, oh well.