Maybe It’s Time We Stop Buying Games on Day One

From a business standpoint, one can hardly blame publishers for their behavior. The video game industry, especially when it comes to the biggest publishers and their biggest franchises, is driven by hits. And hits, more and more, are made at launch, not in the months following. The first week after the launch of a big title has become just as important for the gaming industry as it is for movies, and franchises can live or die by how it goes during this period. Furthermore, quarterly and yearly earnings projections provide a strong incentive to make certain that games are released according to a very strict schedule. So long as sales are good, it doesn’t matter if the game itself is.

But of course, it does matter to gamers, and in the last few years, the purchase of a game at launch date has morphed into a kind of punishment levied against them for being a loyal customer. Consider the day one DLC debacle that came along with Mass Effect 3 (not to mention Mass Effect 3′s other debacle); the numerous bugs that plagued The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim and continue to deprive Playstation 3 players of expansion content; the continued bugginess of Assassin’s Creed 3; the “ending sold separately” gambit Capcom pulled with Azura’s Wrath; Black Ops 2′s Nuketown 2025 map, a pre-order bonus, was rendered inaccessible except in custom games (although that seems to have changed because of player backlash).

Those are all infuriating problems, but do developers care? Increasingly, they don’t have to. In the last five years, publishers and developers have absolutely railed about the problem of piracy, but their solutions to the problem have largely consisted of making it much more difficult for legitimate purchasers to do what they like with the game once they take it home. Digital unlock codes for critical content, always-on DRM, the classification of digital copies as “licenses” rather than purchased products, these are all designed to ensure that once you buy a game, you’re stuck with it, at least until its true owner – the developer – decides not to support it any further.

This should piss you off. Luckily, there’s also an easy solution.

Gamers often call for boycotts of games when they’re unhappy about them, but these displays rarely have a notable impact; often, they tend to show how impotent we as a community really are. For some reason, we really will take whatever we’re given with a smile, or at worst, a snide remark on the Internet. But we don’t stop coming back, largely because we hold out hope for the next over-hyped title, even though we’ve been disappointed before. However, there’s one powerful way to strike back at developers and publishers to make grievances known, and it wouldn’t even require you foregoing the next installment in your favorite franchise.

Just don’t buy a game during that first week. Then watch what happens:

First, you’ll be better-informed about the game before you decide to buy it. Critics and other players will have had a chance to get into the game and judge its quality and character. That’s the point of the review process, after all — informing you of what to expect. Theoretically, you won’t be stuck with a buggy lump of code you can’t resell; or at least, you’ll hopefully know that that outcome is a possibility beforehand.

Second, skipping launch week would be a highly effectual way to make your displeasure known to publishers about things such as day one patches, day one DLC, weak PC ports, online passes, excessive DRM — the whole lot. If enough players who find themselves actively angry about anti-consumer practices from publishers just refused to buy in the first week of a game’s launch, the effect on the bottom line for those publishers would be felt like a seismic shift. In some cases, it could be devastating. And it doesn’t even require you to boycott the game entirely; it just means you need to spend that first week playing something else.

It’s true that a blanket adoption of this policy will also affect developers who generally make a good faith effort to provide as much information as possible about their games in a timely fashion. But the point isn’t merely to ensure that review copies are sent to news outlets before launch, it’s to encourage industry-wide better behavior as the default standard. The only way that works is if the industry agrees overall that the emphasis on first day sales, relevant information be damned, doesn’t work like it used to. For that to happen, every company with skin in the game needs to be affected, not just the chronic bad actors.

The simple fact is that, more than ever before, the people who make games as a business are in a position to take advantage of you, the consumer, and they’ve proven themselves very much willing to do so. You can rage about day one DLC while you’re downloading it and ponying up that extra $10, or you can stop dancing when a publisher pulls the strings. Next time you lay down your cash for a pre-order, ask yourself what you’re actually buying. If we’ve learned anything from the disappointments of 2012, it’s that usually, it really isn’t worth it.


This piece is a collaboration between Phil Hornshaw and Ross Lincoln. Read more of Hornshaw’s work here and Lincoln’s work here, and follow them and Game Front on Twitter: @philhornshaw, @rossalincoln and @gamefrontcom.

Join the Conversation   

* required field

By submitting a comment here you grant GameFront a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate or irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin's discretion.

21 Comments on Maybe It’s Time We Stop Buying Games on Day One

GarynDakari

On November 20, 2012 at 2:10 pm

I’ve still never bought a game during it’s first week, or even paid full price for one. Most, and soonest after launch I’ve ever paid for a game, was $30 for Portal 2, in it’s first month.

No, I’ve never pirated a game either.

I’m just cheap xD Besides, I’m still working through old games, so I’m not in a huge rush for the newer ones. I usually wait around a year after games come out to play them, so I can get the GotY with DLC and such. Except for Valve games of course, since they don’t charge for their DLC.

Huntsman06

On November 20, 2012 at 2:19 pm

I only ever bought 1 game the day it came out. Didn’t go at midnight it was like 8 in the morning or something, but still day 1. Worst mistake ever! I payed $60 for a game that received tons of great reviews and praise to only be disappointed. Now I never buy a game within the first month of it’s release UNLESS it’s a sequel that’s on the same console as it’s predecessor

beema

On November 20, 2012 at 2:23 pm

Great article. As you said, for the past two years or so, it seems like games just punish people for being early buyers. I rarely ever purchase games on release anymore. It makes much more sense to me to wait a few months, and by then, major bugs will be patched and the price will have dropped. Publishers have really done well to cultivate a culture of “me first” mentality among gamers though. Many seem to feel like if you don’t buy every new release that pops out immediately, they are losing out on something. This can sadly be true in cases of the many flash-in-the-pan multiplayer games that come out lately, as a month or two following release, the MP servers will all be dead. Although that usually just speaks to the low quality and lack of staying power for the multiplayer.

Roman

On November 20, 2012 at 2:26 pm

I have followed this for the most part. Early on, I was on the “need to have it” kick, and would be stopping by the store at opening (never a midnight launch for me) and get the game that I “needed”. After getting burned twice, that was enough to make me do one of 3 things. 1) get Gamefly, can get the game and after not liking it, get another that I “needed” 2) use Redbox, though they dont carry many games, I have 5 red boxes in a 3 block area from me, so I can get one nomally, test it out, I like it I go and buy it. Or 3) let the game be out for some time, and get it on the cheap or find out its really good and get it.

Todays younger gamers (not only the young ones, but I see them as the repeat offenders) “NEED” to get the newest “insert FPS game here” game, so some can be the best at leaderboards, which is like being the best nosepicker, good for you, but it doesn’t mean anything.

Wesley

On November 20, 2012 at 2:34 pm

As smudboy put it on Youtube, the people who think they’re the best fans by having their preorders at the ready and forming evidence around opinions as a defence mechanism against constructive criticism are the customers most responsible for keeping the industry in the creative mire. Companies will continue to bleed us dry as long as they’re allowed to, which sadly will be a long time yet.

lol

On November 20, 2012 at 3:09 pm

Uhh no? Why would you not want to pick something up day one? If a million people buy a game and only a few thousand are having an issue that isn’t anything of a problem.

I agree some game launches were horrible, but those same games were given ungodly high scores *cough* diablo 3 *cough*

JawaEsteban

On November 20, 2012 at 3:26 pm

Four words: Wait For Steam Sale.

Thatisall.

GarynDakari

On November 20, 2012 at 3:58 pm

JawaEsteban is on to something.

Dumb Killer

On November 20, 2012 at 4:35 pm

‘lol’ – do you even try to be relevant? How can you say the complaints aren’t a problem? Are you just applying your sad appeal to majority bias again? People pre-ordered a game based on getting something, and it was taken away from them within five days. That is a massive problem, just because it didn’t apply to you personally doesn’t give you the right to arrogantly handwave it so you can pretend everything’s hunky-dory.

Everything I’ve ever seen you post on this site has been completely and abjectly incorrect on factual and ethical levels. You have to try to be as stupid as that, so I can only assume you’re a troll. God help us all if you’re actually that moronic.

lol

On November 20, 2012 at 4:50 pm

@Dumb Killer

By that logic the few people that are having problems aren’t entitled to whine or complain either, or be arrogant about the 60 dollars they took a gamble on.

Forcing you to install and use Steam for a pc is something to be angry about. Having your PSN account hacked is something to be angry about, your Xbox 360 red-ringing is something to be angry about. Wii-U charging 50 cents to play online if you are underage is something to be angry about.

Launch day blues is not. You can NEVER prepare for it.

You are the epitome of today’s gaming generation. Needy, whiny, entitled.

S

On November 20, 2012 at 5:33 pm

I have become a lot more selective about the games I buy release day. I need to be very confident, or simply know that I’m going to buy it regardless of reviews for whatever reason. Generally, if I’m buying release day/week, the developer has earned my trust already. If they break that trust, I’ll start questioning their future releases. Simple as that.

quicktooth

On November 20, 2012 at 10:29 pm

@lol- shhh your troll is showing.
@Phil Hornshaw- you’re darn right. It baffles me that games buyers, and ONLY games buyers, are willing to be flagrantly and maliciously abused by games companies. WE’RE the customers; we’re in charge here. Don’t like/approve/etc a game? Don’t buy it! Might want to do an article explaining the (baffling and worring) “need” that various gamers seem to feel for games, to the point of buying sh!t and claiming they “need” it…

Dumb Killer

On November 21, 2012 at 2:11 am

lol
“By that logic the few people that are having problems aren’t entitled to whine or complain either, or be arrogant about the 60 dollars they took a gamble on.”

They’re not ‘few’, they are a substantial number. And again, I’ve made this very clear – playing the appeal to the majority is not a legitimate argument. The fact that you consider that a $60 investment on a false promise should be considered a “gamble” says it all about your myopic viewpoint.

“Forcing you to install and use Steam for a pc is something to be angry about. Having your PSN account hacked is something to be angry about, your Xbox 360 red-ringing is something to be angry about. Wii-U charging 50 cents to play online if you are underage is something to be angry about.”

Another fallacy, I’m afraid. “You can find fault in these things, so you can’t find fault in another thing” is yet more intellectual laziness.

“Launch day blues is not. You can NEVER prepare for it.”

Exactly! You can’t prepare for companies going against their word and ripping off the customers. Which is exactly why you should never, ever buy on the first day. What exactly was your point on this? You’ve literally just agreed with me, so why are we even having this conversation?

“You are the epitome of today’s gaming generation. Needy, whiny, entitled.”

Nope – because you’ve already established that I’m in the minority. You can’t have it both ways. If you’re in the majority, then it’s YOU who’s the epitome of today’s gaming generation: vacuous, unquestioning, obedient and uninformed. I, on the other hand, simply want games manufacturers to be held to account when they clearly lie about a product they’re selling. What exactly is it about this mindset that troubles you? Is it the fact that it might call into question the integrity of some of the publishers you’re so fond of?

You and your ilk are destroying the entertainment form that you claim to love, and you’re so wide-eyed towards the mainstream developers that you don’t even realise how much damage you’re doing with your endless passivity towards their blatant, provable dishonesty. It’s not ‘entitled’ to expect not to be lied to, it’s common sense. Something that you clearly lack, presumably willingly.

Enjoy Mass Effect 4, by the way – another one of your crimes against the industry.

R.J.

On November 21, 2012 at 11:39 pm

The trick of pre-order bonuses lost its appeal to me when it became common practice to sell said bonuses at a later date. Initially, the bonuses really were just for those who pre-ordered, but then the companies figured out that they could make even more money by selling this content later. When that bonus is sold for 99 cents, it should say a lot about how important it really is. Besides, if the game ends up being good, then it isn’t so bad to buy some DLC, especially if you’ve waited and bought the game at a lower price.

Patches on release day just show who is deciding when a game comes out. It’s the publishers picking when it works for them (holidays, fiscal years, etc.) not the devs who would actually know whether their game is ready for the public. When a game has a big patch on the first day, I get very nervous about it because I’m left wondering how many other bugs there are that they didn’t test thoroughly enough to find.

I also agree that the practice of withholding review copies are requiring reviewers to wait until release day is extremely shady. If publishers truly believe in their investments, why are so many of them afraid of informed consumers? If the game is actually good, then early reviews shouldn’t matter. Is it any wonder that the few games that do get advance reviews also get positive reviews? Even if the publishers are worried about reviewers deliberately low-balling their game, they can factor that into who gets a review copy of the next game. Presumably, review copies are only sent to reputable sources, so the only thing the publishers really have to fear is being called out for a lousy game.

Michael

On November 22, 2012 at 11:35 pm

I totally agree.
Stating next year I will wait until I see real reviews of a game before I purchase them.
So far 2 of my favorite franchises this year had me waste 30 hours of gameplay each with horrible endings that ruined the rest of the games for me. Those 2 games are Mass Effect 3 and Assassins Creed 3.

I realyy dont care how good these games are to some people but when you end a story like they did with these games I think we should get our money back for them. Plus also it makes buying future DLC pointless as well.

Vivid8

On November 24, 2012 at 5:25 am

Absolutely right. I stopped buying games day one after Rac City. It looked broken in the demos, but I figured no one could release a game that un-finished. It was the last 65 dollars I was ever scammed out of. Now I let everything release and give it time before I buy it for a number of reasons. I’m much happier now as a gamer, the industry has become so very greedy and the fans get beat on the most. I understand gaming is about to go to a very very bad place because of the greed and peoples inability to say no to horrible products, but I won’t be a part of it. Microsoft will be releasing a game this year that charges you by the HOUR to play. Either don’t buy it, or support the end of gaming. Because I swear to the power of the universe, if you start showing developers you’re willing to pay by the hour, Halo, Call of Duty and all the rest will become hourly payment games. I promise it.

Mozer

On November 24, 2012 at 7:46 pm

What’s wrong with Gaming Publishers is the same thing that’s wrong with all of America right now. It all falls on one word: GREED. It’s all about “How much can I gain at the expense of others?”

If a world existed where we could take people like that and gun them down in the streets, I would gladly pick up arms and laugh gleefully as the blood of greedy, selfish bastards filled the streets. Unfortunately, like all honest Americans, we are forced to simply tolerate it with the excuse “that’s just how things are” looming over our heads.

The least we can do stop buying games on day one. I for one, will be waiting 2 weeks from now on before buying a game even to get the the publishers to recognize that little “ you!” from me.

My apologies to those who think this post sounds very negative. I’m not a pessimist, just a realist.

Heart Fart

On November 26, 2012 at 5:23 am

Mozer – nobody with any sense or experience would disagree with what you said. Only the self-deluded masochistic industry fanboys who have their games bought for them by their parents would find fault in the concept of “waiting and seeing” instead of going in completely blind and unquestioningly.

SXO

On November 27, 2012 at 7:03 am

I currently only pre-order indie games, with a few exceptions for AAA titles I know I’ll love (e.g. Borderlands 2). My money predominantly goes to indies now, and I tend to wait for bargain bin prices on most of the big games. Once in a while I still buy a game at or near full price if it’s a studio I’d like to support, like the people behind Dishonored, but pre-ordering is largely off the menu unless it’s indie or nearly guaranteed to be awesome.

Rista B

On November 28, 2012 at 12:50 pm

I’m sure I’m old, stupid and boring but I have never bought a game on day one. Never understood why people would run out and pay full retail for a game that they could save 20% and more on just a few weeks later. Never paid full price for DLC and can’t figure out why people buy a used game for a few dollars less than a full priced new game when again they could get it for significantly cheaper in the very near future.

And the way the console makers/game publishers are pricing their products makes Steam and PC gaming look better every month. Which is really too bad because I prefer to game on my couch with a console controller.

SXO

On November 29, 2012 at 6:50 am

@Rista B

To answer your question as to “why” people buy games at full price, most of the time it’s because of lack of patience. People want their fixes NOW rather than later. It’s the same mentality that makes people blow through 100-hour RPG’s in 40 hours, achieve max level in MMO’s within days rather than weeks, etc.

Me personally however, my reason as I stated in my previous post is simply to support the developers. I intentionally pay full price for certain games because I can afford to do it, and I want those developers to have my hard earned money so they can continue making their particular flavor of games. I don’t knock people for not doing what I do, it makes perfect logical sense to wait for a better price, especially if you don’t intend to play the game right away. I just feel like doing my part, however meager, to keep the good people in the industry going.