The Cave Review: Guilty of the Deadly Sin of Being Boring

Lately, developer Double Fine has been trading on the nostalgia attached to its own brand.

Take Double Fine Adventure, a record-breaking Kickstarter campaign for a pretty vague adventure game (we literally knew almost nothing about it when it was getting its crowd-sourced funding) that was more or less sold on the idea of players remembering and liking games such as The Secret of Monkey Island.

The Cave feels that way too — a game predicated on the idea that other games made by Double Fine are amazing, and so too is this one. But where other games in Double Fine’s library, like Psychonauts and Stacking, have done the work to earn that reverence for the developer, The Cave falls well short, failing to bring along anything exceptional. It’s a nice enough game, but marred by lots of design decisions that make it irritating. It’s kinda funny, with some kinda-smart puzzles and a kinda-fun premise. And so the final product is only kinda good.

The Cave (PC [Reviewed], Xbox 360)
Developer: Double Fine Productions
Publisher: Sega
Release Date: Jan. 23, 2013
MSRP: $14.99

Seven characters are yours to choose from at the outset of your run through The Cave, and the whole game is narrated by the titular subterranean hollow, which happens to also be sentient and a bit snarky. The people who gather at the Cave do so to search for the things they desire most, and all the characters are awful people seemingly guilty of some terrible transgressions in their lives. They’re also collected from across time and space, from both the distant past and the distant future, which suggests along with the game’s subject matter that The Cave is a place of judgment, possibly a kind of purgatory. (I’m also of the thinking that the stories of the characters represent the Seven Deadly Sins.)

To star the game, players choose three of the seven characters and venture into the Cave, which is done by grabbing a nearby crowbar and prying off the boards that bar entry. Once you choose your three characters, you’re stuck with them, and who you choose affects the story as the game tells it to you. That’s because the Cave is full of areas that are specifically modeled on the backstories and characteristics of the people you bring with you, and while you’ll pass levels you can’t access because you don’t have the right people in your party, it also means multiple playthroughs are necessary to see everything.

You can interpret that last bit — the requirement of multiple playthroughs — in more than one way. On the one hand, it’s good, because The Cave stays organic in that it’s a different experience, somewhat, the first and second times you play through. It’s also a negative consideration because that means you can’t experience the whole game in one shot, and you have to replay roughly half the game to see the new content. To get through all seven characters’ stories, you have to make three total runs through the game, complete with solving several of the same puzzles and passing through the same areas over and over again. That’s not replayability, it’s tedium.

Logistically, the game is set up like a side-scrolling Metroidvania title, requiring players to move both vertically and horizontally to find all the rooms and complete all the puzzles. It plays a bit like Trine, in that you have three characters and each is supposed to have his or her own special ability. The game also is billed as a platformer, but platforming elements are incredibly few and far between and never require any degree of skill; this is a platform only in that it’s a sidescrolling game organized vertically, and so you have to hit the jump button to get to rooms that are positioned above you.

Join the Conversation   

* required field

By submitting a comment here you grant GameFront a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate or irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin's discretion.

4 Comments on The Cave Review: Guilty of the Deadly Sin of Being Boring

R.J.

On February 10, 2013 at 2:10 pm

Hopefully, other Kickstarter games will fair better as we move forward. But, Phil’s review brought up something that concerns me about Kickstarter, in general. While I like the idea of making things that might not get made because they “won’t sell,” I’m also very concerned by the prospect of generating revenue based on a company’s name and a vague description. Yes, Double Fine has a good reputation, but that isn’t always enough to guarantee quality. As other commenters on this site have said, it might be a good thing if a few Kickstarter projects don’t pan out so people are more judicious about where their money goes.

Bernie Holms

On February 10, 2013 at 4:20 pm

R.J., this isn’t the kickstarter game. That game is tentatively titled “Reds.” This game is completely unrelated to the kickstarter.

Phil Hornshaw

On February 10, 2013 at 5:24 pm

@RJ

I for one try to be optimistic about stuff like this, but I tend to agree that not every Kickstarter seems like a great idea. Our own Ron Whitaker seems to think we might start seeing the decline of a few Kickstarter projects pretty soon, which is going to have some serious implications for the platform and crowd-sourcing in general. What I worry about is seeing that backlash affect smaller dev teams that really DO need the money to make something amazing, because I have a feeling that if Kickstarter projects start to bomb, it’s not going to be the well-known developers like Double Fine and Obsidian that people stop funding, but the unknowns with big ideas.

welshman007

On February 19, 2013 at 7:47 am

Am having problems in getting a ticket from DUNKING BOOTH, therefor it prevents me from going further.