I dont like how they have only one thing of saying something. every unit says the same thing when you click on them. "lesyay"? prostagama"? and like 3 other things but thats all. it gets on my nereves. :uhoh: -And the heros in WarCraft III are a little better than the ones in AoM -And dont you think the battles in warcraft 3 are i BIT chessy? The ones in AoM are acually really great cinces of fighting, but in warcraft, all it is is a bunch of cartoony, blocky guys, mauling eachother. -but i still say warcraft 3 is very good, multiplayer.:) (single missions are S0-S0):uhm:
Dude, that is sooooooooooooo not true! AOM is tons better than any other computer game. If you don't believe me, look at the top 5 video game polls from 3 months ago! God, all you Aom haters. If you really hate AOM so much, post somewhere else, you wierdos! This doesn't benefit the game in any way, so stop posting in the AOM general discussion!:deal: :mad: ------------------------------------ LINK_LEGEND Aomfiles.com staff member
Thats Greek, Nordish, and Egyptian for you. And If you love warcraft 3 more than you love aom, go post in their forums.
Well I think AOM is a better game but WC3 has a better editor...
EVERYONE knows AOM is better than WC3, in all lifestyles, sizes, shapes, and forms. But, I must admit, I would like AOM better if it had a basic unit editor, like WC3. It could be used for mods that you wouldn't want to spend as much time on, or for beginners.
I thought the graphics were a little "edgy". AoK was very crisp, though it was in 2D. With the transition to 3D, the graphics wern't as crisp.
Im not saying i hate AoM, <.<. but multiplayer is Sucks compared to WarCrafts multiplayer. In War3 they have Tower Defence, footman wars, sheep tag, wintermaul war's (praise Duke-wintermaul of all the mauls), castle madness, RPG maps, paintball, archer tatics, and like 100 more. -and AoM has 2000 people online while warcraft TFT has what? oh ya. 20500 And the ediors better in WarCraft III by a 100 miles.
But the 1v2 compstomp is much better in AoM. And, the Single-player game is by far better than War3's
And the ediors better in WarCraft III by a 100 miles. But the 1v2 compstomp is much better in AoM. And, the Single-player game is by far better than War3's
pugsworththehermitEVERYONE knows AOM is better than WC3, in all lifestyles, sizes, shapes, and forms. But, I must admit, I would like AOM better if it had a basic unit editor, like WC3. It could be used for mods that you wouldn't want to spend as much time on, or for beginners.
Strange, EVERYONE i know just prefer WC3. I like AoM but War3 is a whole new concept while AoM is just a slightly upgraded Age of Empires type game. I dont know what you mean by lifestyle (what, people who play War3 live by night and drink blood from people?) and for sizes, shapes and form it was blizzard's idea to do it like that (a very good idea, to respect the tradition of both Warcraft 1&2). And War3 is much more immersive too.
God, go post in the Warcraft 3 forums if you all hate AOM so much. Don't post in here and be nice! ------------- Link_Legend Aomfiles.com staff ----------------------------- P.S. Smartslug, you don't know what you're talking about- AOM is much better because graphics are better.
Plus, the editor sucks in warcraft 3. I have it and I hate that game. It preoccupied my life for about 5 hours and I rarely ever play it.
Get a life and go play AOM. :banana::lock::banana::lock::banana: