Machine guns - a little too inacurate. -1 reply

Please wait...

Jobo

GF makes me horny

50 XP

23rd January 2003

0 Uploads

93 Posts

0 Threads

#1 15 years ago

I find the machine guns for the support role a little too inacurate and hoped they are tweaken for next patch or retail release. I know they are MGs, and i am a good shot in bf2, and i do go prone but i still find it a nightmare landing rounds on infantry.

Either make it more accurate, or mate it more powerful i say, even when u do hit ur target keeps on trotting away :mad:




psyichic

You have been Sp00n3d

50 XP

11th February 2003

0 Uploads

697 Posts

0 Threads

#2 15 years ago

yea I agree they should up the accuracy when you burst the gun while prone in iron sights. It would at least make it so that support arent just dead targets when shooting at you from 50M away.




FN_lewrbm69

It's Not Easy Being Green

50 XP

10th November 2003

0 Uploads

3,372 Posts

0 Threads

#3 15 years ago

well the 50cal is on the money for the most part(x-army i am) and the M240(unlocked servers) it is way off an the M249 is close when i are laying down with the bi-pod down betond that it is off so only one close is 50cal mounted on the hummve




compgeek64939

RATM are the Best

50 XP

27th December 2004

0 Uploads

42 Posts

0 Threads

#4 15 years ago

The support guns i find arent that inaccurate. Only when you try and spray bullets everywhere. But if you just do a little slower rate of fire its much more accurate. Just tap the mouse instead of holding it.