Yes true. It is unsportsmanly to do it but you do need to accept that some ppl will do it, and that it sounds like that has happend in this case.
RussianComrade;3327576I'll go for the medics first. I'm more interested in stopping an enemy assault than racking up a huge number of kills. Plus I hardly ever snipe.
I do the same, but unlike you I play as a sniper quite often. ;)
He said that he was under supressive fire, ie. machine gun, not usualy sniper (unless it is semi-auto, tough luck giving supressive fire with a bolt), in that case the medic would be a target as well. Although the medic might be good at reviving, he might not be that smart, as he has a fully capable assault rifle, that could take out the supressive fire, and then he could go to revive the guy.
SVD_Sniper;3327525*sigh* a) I agree with the whiteshark guy - the game is not about points but teamwork. However everyone still wants points from time to time. Maybee you just really want thet P90 unlock? B) The shooter may not want the medic dead. Hence the medic "is good enough" to revive them???!?!?! It may not be a case of who is better. The sniper may not even be aiming at the medic! He just wants to get an easy 8 kills not simply 2! do you understand? The medic is not being considered a target. Which is why he doesnt get shot! c) read b) again. twice. You seemed to miss my point the 1st time round. d) humm. Rewards for agreeing with a moderator. Think that one over. e) "common sense" ? connon sense dictates the sniper wants 8 kills and the medic (total of 9 ) not just 2 kills. no?
Shooter may not want the medic dead, but they aren't the only THREE people playing on a server in that area, so i say again, if he sat there and got shot by the same person 8 times, come on Sniper. LOL....... Rewards for agreeing with a moderator, same reason for giving good rep for good posts. It is common sense .. Poster hasn't given any proof he can play, and has only given proof he can't... Oh and you have gotten rep for agreeing with my posts also...So think about that . And you just said it yourself that the poster is an easy kill... WHAT MORE HAS TO BE SAID ? My original statement stands: he hates the game cause there are people that play better than he.
There was something that pissed me the hell of last night. 1 : In that Something at Karkand there's a big building next to a flag (you can't get on) and some gays somehow get up there, shoot through walls and piss you off. 2 : When your team is loosing and they go over to the other team because they don't want to lose, and you just die. 3 : The nobs who try to kick you off the commander position caue they want it.. Phags. :(
hadeez;33277173 : The nobs who try to kick you off the commander position caue they want it.. Phags. :(
Not only that, but I often see people kicking me out of the commander position, after having done that, the commander position is empty for the rest of the round..
A bad commander is better than no commander at all, unless the bad commander uses arty on his own team.
getting killed when you barely touch the side of a vehicle the fact that they reduced the C4 throwing distance the svd dragunov
WhiteShark;3327726A bad commander is better than no commander at all, unless the bad commander uses arty on his own team.
As someone that has reached Gunny Sgt. in this game, then started over for the hell of it, i feel i have enough time spent on this game to comment on this!!! SVD_Sniper...Im glad someone here can see that BF2 is SUPPOSED to be about teamwork. All the things said about stat padding are absolutely correct. The medic is in no way a better player than the person getting shot. Perhaps if some of you would spend time on a ranked server and get spawn killed you would know. Not to mention the fact that it is very difficult to get up from being revived and flee...ESPECIALLY IN AN ALLY. Not a "open field". In my opinon the sniper and the medic are both stat padding, the sniper spawn killing included (considering that the sniper was spawnkilling to begin with most likely) If you have ever played a medic kit, on a ranked server, for any amount of time you would understand that it's important to... 1. Be part of squad (DUH) 2. Play a support role as well to advance the squad. 3 Revive only after the path is clear, or risk the whole squad getting killed. 4. Don't forget you can spawn on the squad leader! 5. Shall i go on???? :deal: It all boils down to the fact that more than half of the arguing parties have no experience playing on ranked servers for one, and two, have no idea what teamwork is all about. If the terms "stat padding" and "spawn killing" where understood that would help as well. And finally, no determination of a player's skill can be made by a forum post :rolleyes: Give me a break!!! If you want a great server to play on, with great people who know about teamwork and the way this game SHOULD be played, you're all welcome to hop on the DogSoldiers' ranked BF2 server. 184.108.40.206:16567 Have a nice day! :cya:
Focking Einstein;33277651. Be part of squad (DUH) 2. Play a support role as well to advance the squad. 3 Revive only after the path is clear, or risk the whole squad getting killed. 4. Don't forget you can spawn on the squad leader! 5. Shall i go on???? :deal:
Teamwork is basically what the games about, beside from shooting the hell out of people and crap like that. You're not going to capture all the flags with a one-man team. You see people who shoot you so they can get in a plane, when they're in your squad?
right. a) MerricDS. If you gave me rewards just for agreeing with you that is wrong. Possibly AKA corruption. You should reward (surely) for someone constructing a informative or well considerd, profound post. Rewards are not to promote an opinion. b) At last someone who realises what im talking about (thnx einstein). Of course you cannot tell someones skill by a post. Isnt that obvious c) It is obviously possible to lay down supressing fire with a sniper rifle. Look it up. Supressing fire is on of two things.
- Fire designed to keep defending troops in cover so you can advance without defenders knowing where you are and being able to return fire.
- Fire designed to make advancing troops get to cover. This is because you can pin them down and slow down an assault, buying you time. The first thing anyone does when a sniper hits their buddy in the head is get to cover. And wait untill the sniper/Mg er has moved or died.
Hence you can see supressing fire is designed to limit movement. It has nothing to do with the quantity of bullets you are spitting at the enemy. c) Well yes, killing/reviving the same guy over and over IS STAT PADDING but it still happens. And it can happen to anyone d) Unlike you,(merricDS, wolvesgoalie etc...) we are not all perfect, and when being revived you are often facing the wrong direction, have the wrong kit and all sorts. I happen to know that in the time it takes you to figure out where the neares cover is and get to it, i will as a sniper probably have plenty of time to nail you. It takes me a fraction of a second to move the crosshairs a few pixels and click. Takes longer to think and then get to cover.
e) Yes I realise there are more than 3 ppl in the game, but in this case, only 3 ppl are mentioned. So you cant assume any thing else. f)Oh and the medic victim sniper situation is great supressing fire on the part of the sniper. You are slowing down the advance of both players for a prolonged amount of time. g) Oh and before i forget. One man can cap a flag. I do it all the time. Im not showing off, I do it by being a coward. E.g. Strike at karkers. You are USMC and there is a stalemate. No-one can get thru into the alleys and streets. So you sneak in alone(often along the train tracks), taking your time, unseen and sit and cap "train crash" usually you can get it before anyone notices its neutral. Hey presto - no more stalemate. Phew, long post eh?:eek: