here are my reasons 1. bfv had little patch support 2. no demo 3. it has basicly died after BF2 came out (but Bf1942 hasn't) 4. it was mostly BF1942 gameplay with nicer looking stuff 5. when BFV was realeased, BF2 was already being shown in development 6. there were no expantions so what do you think?
IAmAMoronhere are my reasons 1. bfv had little patch support 2. no demo 3. it has basicly died after BF2 came out (but Bf1942 hasn't) 4. it was mostly BF1942 gameplay with nicer looking stuff 5. when BFV was realeased, BF2 was already being shown in development 6. there were no expantions so what do you think?
I kind of think the same way that you do. I will give my answers to your reasons. They will closely match up. 1. I agree here. They have made I believe 3 patches for this game. There is still some things that need to be done here. So another patch would be good. 2. Man did this ever make me and some of my freinds angry!!!! They made one for an expansion such as Secret Weapons but not for a new game???? Does make you wonder a bit. 3. Well I do not know about it dying. There are still people who play it and are making mods for it. But I do have to agree that it is not as popular as BF1942 or BF2. 4. As far as gameplay, Yes for the most part, it was like BF1942 but in this one, they added such things as the 3D map, better render engine, radios in vehicles ( I know that is not an imporvement to gameplay but I was trying to point out all differences), The ability to taunt, and the ability to change appearances/kits of soldiers. 5. This does kind of does make you wonder. 6. The closest that EA did for an expansion is when they did that WWII mod for BFV. I still think that a expansion would be good! There is alot of the Vietnam conflict still missing with the game. Although I do enjoy playing the game, I think that a well thought out expansion would work out good here! The above are my opinions only. Others may/may not agree with them. But I was just showing to the original poster that they are not alone here.:deal:
EA doesn't need money, so 'no'.
Jeff is a missing boss
28th July 2002
im not sure why they even made it......but some of the mods are good
Just FYI no one plays the mods anymore (trust me I've download BF42 and the Battlefield 1942 on Nam Sampler: all servers with no one in them)
BFV and BF2 are the only BF games me and my mates play and it is mainly BFV
I like BFV better than BF2. BF2 is to much team work games. I really don't like team work. I like BFV and BF1942 cause you had the freedom of doing w.e the hell you want now its like you don't do team work in BF2 you cant play :( Also I liked BFV better than BF1942 cause of the better graphics and every thing but mods for it wernt that good and for it and it really didnt boom.
BFV was vastly superior to BF1942, (I don't care what anyone else says. This is MY opinion) I got so good in BFV's helicopters that my mates considered me a GOD in them, (exaggeration, but you know what I mean.) BF1942 was so bland and dull, BFV had beautiful jungle environments and water that could be called, water. And flying a MIG-17 around on Flaming Dart with a joystick shooting down F-4's is just.... Priceless....
Snipes With Artillery
22nd March 2005
I'm pissed that they counldn't even get bugs out of their patches. Pardon me if I'm wrong, but aren't Patches supposed to fix problems, not make them?
Really i must say BF2 disappointed me B I G i don't find it really fun too play, it is too hard to kill somebody, the tanks are overpowered, i like bfv more than BF2