Yeah, DC is better, if the choppers handled the same as BFV on DC, and got rid of the shitty lag, it would be perfect.
Ensign RilesPersonally I play more EoD than BFV. It is simply a matter of quality and principles. Perhaps when EoD does its mod for BF2, then they will know what they should have done for BFV...
EoD is worse than BF:V except for the balance issues. Now somebody make this poll public please.
I like the BFV graphics engine but, I like the BF 1942/DC/DCX gameplay better. I just DL BF 1942 maps for BFV so Im interested to see if the feeling changes.
CamBoi would have to disagree. there are a few balance issues -Tons of Mods -way less camping
Well actualy I have cancled down your post a bit about these 2 Well Tons of mods soon bfv will have tons of mods and secondly way less camping ermmm well actually alot of servers I go on do have camping or is it just me
bfv has been out since march and so far theres been about 3 total conversions released. i do agree maps like berlin will always have camping, but helicopters can be the masters of camping and theres helicopters on almost every bfv map.
I seem to enjoy jungles more than the deserts.
Does Anyone Know When Battlecraft Vietnam V1.1 Will Be Out?
BFV just flat rocks. Name a better online warsim? And don't say BF1942. BFV is just an improved version of BF1942 set in a different era. As far as balance? It seems fine to me. I do fine on both sides ,as most I play do as well. Has anyome here tryed JointOps Typhoon rising yet? It has promise.
I love BFV. As for balance issues, the war was unbalenced, too many vc, and nva, and you couldn't find'em. Thats why you napalm the jungle, it deprived'em of their cover. :daddy:
Hey, at least you can actually fly the choppers in BFV. No fitting 10 or so soldiers in a chopper with 2 :tommygun: mini guns with like 4,000 rounds. Now thats cheating!!!!! :daddy: Also I recall reading somewhere that most deserts percentage wise are made up 70 to 30 of rocks, not sand dunes. Was that ever reflected in DC, hell no.