Call of Duty 3 vs. Brothers in Arms 3 vs. Medal of Honor Hells Highway -1 reply

Please wait...

borntoshoot

This....... is my BOOM STICK!!

50 XP

1st September 2006

0 Uploads

222 Posts

0 Threads

#11 14 years ago
General RommelNo, cod 3 is going to be just like Big Red One, pure suckage.. Airborne looks really cool how you can pick where you land and BIA HWTH looks really amazing graphics wise.

Thats true Medal of Honor Airbourne looks like an awesome game




borntoshoot

This....... is my BOOM STICK!!

50 XP

1st September 2006

0 Uploads

222 Posts

0 Threads

#12 14 years ago

I guess im gonna go with medal of Honor So Far




Adeazagra

~Freedom isnt free

50 XP

3rd November 2005

0 Uploads

139 Posts

0 Threads

#13 14 years ago

I think each will have it's strength's and weaknesses. Medal of honor:Airborne looks like it will be some sort of a what-CoD2-was-supposed-to-be kind of game. While BiA:HH looks like it will be superior in both graphics and realism. CoD 3 on the other hand has a weakness of being only for console and having a few unfavored reputations (mostly due to CoD 2 even though it wasnt bad) in terms of realism. The question is, which one will be the better in the long run. On a side note, I want to point out that CoD 4 will be for PC and will be releasing after CoD 3 (prehaps some months after say, March?) and will have the oppurtunity to put some happy faces on the Die-hard PC gamers. In my opinion, they will all be spectacular in their own ways. To be honest, if the companies combined all the games into one, it would probably be the most defining WW 2 game ever known to man but since that's a near impossiblilty, I think that if I had to pick 2 of the 3 I would pick Medal of Honor: Airborne, and CoD 3 simply because sometimes the realsim on BiA can feel a bit limiting as far as gameplay goes (however i want to point out that I truly have little idea how these games are going to play out so your better off doing your research before going on a shopping spree ;)). All in all, if i had the money I would buy all three if i liked them. However, it would probably be wise to rent the games ( or "borrow them" from a friend ;)) to see how they compare. Only time will tell...




borntoshoot

This....... is my BOOM STICK!!

50 XP

1st September 2006

0 Uploads

222 Posts

0 Threads

#14 14 years ago

Good point there Adeazagra




Hanbit

Formally Nathan_Kang

50 XP

5th July 2005

0 Uploads

280 Posts

0 Threads

#15 14 years ago

Brothers In Arms: Hells Highway is absolutely the worst game ever.




L_E_O

I don't spend enough time here

50 XP

7th March 2006

0 Uploads

21 Posts

0 Threads

#16 14 years ago

Hanbit you cant really say anything bad about it becuase it isnt out yet. Your just showing everyone how close minded you are.




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#17 14 years ago

ya gotta get bia3..have you seen the trailers?..awesome game, its tough commanding 2 squads plus yourself, maybe thats why people dont like ut?




live long and prosper

ARE YOU READY???

50 XP

13th July 2005

0 Uploads

87 Posts

0 Threads

#18 14 years ago

Brothers in arms the whole way. realism and strategy = best ww2 shooter.




Tally

COD Über Support

50 XP

20th November 2004

0 Uploads

3,439 Posts

0 Threads

#19 14 years ago

"The" game for PC to look for will be MOH:Airbourne, due out Feb/March 2007

The first 2 BIAs were a pile of dung. Neither of them made the top ten (top 20 even?). As this new one (BIA3) doesnt use a new game engine, I dont see how its going to be a significant improvement on the other 2.




5c0rch

Move, or I'll shoot.

50 XP

26th June 2006

0 Uploads

49 Posts

0 Threads

#20 14 years ago

For all of those play-for-fun gamers out there who hate being responsible for an entire squad, yet want some guys watching their back, i would go for COD3...too bad its not 4 PC. In this case, I agree with Tally. Medal of Honor Airborne looks a little better and it also seems a bit less complicated than BIA:HH. Hopefully it wont flop like MoH:European Assault. :rolleyes: