192837465Their is no reason to feel proud about Vietnam, you guys lost.... badly.. lol anyways ... whatever im tired
They lost bad? American soldiers didn't lose a single battle in Vietnam... the major offensive by the NVA, Tet, was totally crushed. They lost the propoganda war, not the war in the field. The NVA and VC were the losers... 3 million dead compared to some 58,000 Americans.
I think that CoD2 was a good game... They should use that skill to make a modern age game... Like including M1 tanks, M-16A2 assault rifles, or maybe even AKs... I duuno tho:p
:ak3::aug2::runaway::aug: :aug: :tommygun::dpistols::banned: :aug: :aug: :ak3::greenflame::runaway::aug: :aug: :agreed
I didn't make it!
i think that the next COD should be like a modern war with jets and nukes XD like @ the end of the game a a-bomb kills ALL LIFE FORMS Muhahahahaha...*couch, couch*...XDD but it should show the end of war... for the time being
master joni think that the next COD should be like a modern war with jets and nukes XD like @ the end of the game a a-bomb kills ALL LIFE FORMS Muhahahahaha...*couch, couch*...XDD but it should show the end of war... for the time being
And the Call of Duty Series would then be fighting for top supremecy with other popular modern warefare games (AKA Battlefield 2 and Americas Army). There are many WWII games, but IMO the Call of Duty series is the best Ive played.
WW2 or WW1. Imagine going "over the top" with the mist and smoke and shelling? A WW1 CoD would work if you started with the battle of Verdun or the Somme, and went on from there. BTW for those who want a Vietnam one, you do realise that the US lost that war? The US's main aim in 'nam was to defeat communism in the country and you failed. It's not about numbers of dead, but whether or not you achieve your aims. So there would be no victory at the end, it would just be you skulking off home leaving the country in ruins. People who think the US won the war need a new history book and some inteligence to go with it.
the problem with a world war 1 game is that it doesn't work well in game form (at least in single player) because a lot of the time was spent doing nothing other than shelling and while going over the top would be dramatic the fact that you had a 70% (or more) in some cases of dying in the next 30 seconds probably wouldn't translate well to a game...
Aeneas2020, please, stop, you obviously havent studied the first world war..
Again, i believe the first world war would be Quite awesome... there is quite a bit to experience in a game like that
But the thing is, it was quite the gruesome war... Lots of dead bodies.. Lots... So they wuld have to make the game gruesome to actually stand up to World War 1 standards
and WW2 wasn't gruesome? It was worse in many ways because of the more advanced weapons
please stop? i haven't studied the first world war do not make assumptions please? what would you know...for your information i am a professional historian with warfare and particularly 20th century warfare being a specialist topic of mine. My beleif is the game dynamic would be poor and you have not listed any experiences...Also if it would make a good game why has no one released an sp game about ww1? You are of course entitled to your opinion but then again so am i! if you list some good reasons why you think it would work i'll agree...and btw if anyone is considering making a ww1 mod i would be happy to work on it with them although i really dont think it would work in sp.
192837465 - please dont flamebaite. adhere to the rules on these forums.