With the adddition of vehicles in the UO expansion, do you think CoD has killed BF1942?
i think the sherman :) :) :)
surely it has
No, noobs, you still cant use ships, planes, and other vehicles in cod. Plus its not 64 players.
No! I'm Spamacus!
17th June 2003
Not another one of these threads. The gameplay is completely different. The only thing that is similar about them is there lack of realism.
Yes Uo Is Better That Bf1942
Yeah this blows the balls off of BF, the tanks/jeeps are better, gameplay is way better and it feels much more realistic, oh and i was on a server yesterday with i think 64 people so just to let ya know.
yea 64 players are alowd stealth
Are you INSANE Call of Duty is the crappiest world war 2 ever made How can you even compare it to Battlefield 1942??? Battlefield 1942, has awesome multiplayer IN Call of Duty everything lags like hell
You can have 64 players IN call of duty, the maximum is 32
In bf1942 it is so so simple to make a mod Let alone apply a patch When i wanted to install a patch for bf1942 all i had to do was double click on the installer IN COD u had to dl a ".Tar" file and u had to extract it god knows where
Sure Call of Duty has better graphics, wait a min.. there exactly the same!!!
And u guys talking about COD having more realism WAT!? Who ever said that reallism games are good! HA! They are the worst kind of games Being realistic doesnt mean its a good game you know
In COD u can only have like 3 vehicles In bf1942 u can have jeeps, tanks, bombers, subs, helicopters (in the expansion), battleships, all kind of boats, and probably more.
And when Battlefield 2 comes out... BAM Activision will go bankrupt Battlefield 2 will have over 100 players in multiplayer
And in conclusion Cod sucks alot!!!! Bf1942 rules The only thing that Call of Duty is better in battlefield 1942 is... Single player Who playz single player anyway!???
Well thats my time for today.. :0wned: :0wned: :0wned: