whuch game do you like best CoD:UO(CoD1) or CoD2? As far as game play goes which do you like better. Please post comments and some reasons, we are trying to decide to get CoD:UO and put up a server for it and have never played it, but I hear alot of folks prefer the first.
Who shall watch the watchers?
15th April 2006
CodUO. It seems a lot less susceptible to cheaters and exploiters. I can truly say I have not enjoyed playing CoD2 online. Full of people with seemingly x-ray vision to instantly penetrate the thickest dust/smoke/fog and automatic weapons that don't seem to recoil.
CoDUO isn't totally without these problems, but it isn't overun by them either.
Free love can go to hell
17th October 2006
CODUO all the way but saying that COD2 is still good but coduo i hav alot more fun on it has tanks, surport weapons (weapons u can set up) and the maps are full of good spots to hide and ambush points if u no where they are that is lots of fun i think so anyway
11th February 2006
CoDUO crushes CoD2 at multiplayer, but CoD2 has an amazing single player. i'd have to go with UO though because i dunno it has that call of duty feel to it, while cod2 is like a different game.
That's an easy one... Definately UO. The exploits in CoD2 are the main reason I actually stopped playing this game and reverted to UO. And also the vehicles :d
It feels so empty without me
24th September 2006
Well i got COD2 before i bought the COD and UO and I then started to think that UO is better than COD2 but for some reason i prefer COD2, i think it's because of more realistic MP and SP + i like weapons of COD2 more than the one's in UO
29th January 2005
Here's my thoughts.
CoD1+UO: Much longer SP campaign, and very fun missions. The multiplayer has an edge with more game modes and vehicles. Epic missions like crossing the Volga to be deployed at Stalingrad, Kursk, Normandy, Invasion of Italy, Berlin, Tank Battles, etc. Everything felt a lot longer in this game, and despite the older graphics, I felt more in to it. Vehicles and larger maps help add to the atmosphere.
CoD 2: Presents the war climate much better, but the campaign is shorter. The Russians got the short end of the stick here, as they have the least missions- their first mission is on the outskirts of Moscow and serves as a training mission for the game. The rest are set in Stalingrad and consist of blowing up tanks and uprooting Germans from their positions. The other campaigns are pretty cool though, but short... The better graphics and mechanics (Except the health system and removal of grenade cooking) help give you a nice gaming experience. Scaling the cliffs at Pointe Du Hoc, charging across the desert to fight Rommel, fighting in small French villages, and the ruins of Stalingrad are a blast.
The Multiplayer isn't as intense as CoD 1, but is fun in its own right. It's also far more modable than CoD 1, which helps extend its playability and life.
I have CoD 2, and I play it alot. I used to have CoD 1 and UO, but its directory got corrupted and much to my dismay I found that my CD's were in bad shape, so I'm going to have to wait until I can find those at a good deal and buy them again. I'm itching to play through the campaign again.