System Specs + Game Performance -1 reply

Please wait...

Guns4Hire

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

22nd September 2002

0 Uploads

15,559 Posts

0 Threads

#21 15 years ago
PlumleyThat 1.7 can hold it's own still with just about anything being sold now (minus a higher running P4). Or so I'm told.

Don't believe everything you are told ;) :)




shinyrory

*hides pie from noodle*

50 XP

17th March 2003

0 Uploads

246 Posts

0 Threads

#22 15 years ago

lmao




NeoFX

Doom3r

50 XP

2nd March 2004

0 Uploads

102 Posts

0 Threads

#23 15 years ago

When I boug the FX5900 I was really considering an ATI but they were way out of my price range 3 months ago when I really needed an upgrade. 300 bucks vs. 200 for my 5900. Now that DX9 games are coming out tho I get kinda pissed off at how these games perform. Far Cry for instance sucks performance wise but still looks great! Painkiller played fine and this plays smooth until I walk up to a building or vehicle... or zoom then FPS goes to like 20-30s *from over 100* (which I don't understand....). I'll wait to see how the NV4x is, I will probably get one of those in a year or so... Im 16 and don't have a job so that means very little income :P Anyway... this card plays all my games for the most part perfectly but this DX9 crap is just stupid... how could nVidia screw up like that?




shinyrory

*hides pie from noodle*

50 XP

17th March 2003

0 Uploads

246 Posts

0 Threads

#24 15 years ago

The new Geforce have some serious probs with new games




Plumley

Sgt. Major

50 XP

16th March 2004

0 Uploads

17 Posts

0 Threads

#25 15 years ago

It's running great for me. I have tons of HD space, but I'm gonna look to up the P4 soon.....then install a larger HD. After that I suppose it'll be more RAM again :nodding: 1.5G of RAM will be required for optimum performance with the next Battlefield game anyways :p Might as well plan for the future ;)




Astaldo711

Son of the Valient Sword

50 XP

23rd December 2002

0 Uploads

175 Posts

0 Threads

#26 15 years ago

P4 3.2Ghz 1GB Ram Radeon 9800 XT 256MB Audigy 2 250GB HD

I have all the graphics set to their highest value, running in 1124x968 (I think that's it. The one up from 1024x768) It runs smooth as glass




mrhola

The optimistic pseudo Mexican!

50 XP

6th September 2003

0 Uploads

59 Posts

0 Threads

#27 15 years ago

2.4 Ghz P4a 512mb PC2100 (icky) Radeon 9600xt (great value card) 128mb btw

Runs fairly smooth at 1182x960 or whatever that one is. Everything jacked up... 'cept lightmaps off (which doesn't change the look of anything for me). prolly 40-35 FPS




~ mister b ~

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

26th March 2004

0 Uploads

2 Posts

0 Threads

#28 15 years ago

xp 2200 512 2100 ddr ram radeon 9500 pro sb live! 5.1 windows xp everything is on max except graphics, it's on high not very high. game runs awesome, the odd time it slows down a tad for a few seconds....don't overbuy! :beer:




KillaKilla

PC Hardware

50 XP

27th March 2004

0 Uploads

13 Posts

0 Threads

#29 15 years ago

main:

A64 3000+ ATI R360 (9800 Pro 128MB) 1024MB, 400Mhz Windows XP SP1 2048Kb or so ADSL Those are the only parts that affect anything... Fine on medium... Secondary: P4 2.6/800Mhz 512MB 400Mhz GF2 Ultra 64Mb Windows XP SP1 Unplayable at any settings.




NeoFX

Doom3r

50 XP

2nd March 2004

0 Uploads

102 Posts

0 Threads

#30 15 years ago

lol .... on your secondary system the GF card is the only thing holding you back... Upgrade and you'll have 2 decent machines... Neo needs more ram :(