I didn't make it!
Really, your just scamming people. You are making this 3 year old company start out with a bbbbbbbbaaaaaaad reputation[petro]. I am talking about this unbalanced issue in FOC. Honestly, if you cant make unique content without it being balanced then you might as well make factions like SW:GB. I would actually like to see what EAW would look like with the venator back and FOC with the eclipse back. Who else thinks FOC is unbalanced.
Agreed. When i play the consortium i can win even when the enemy has 6 isd's and i have 1 vengance cruiser and a lvl 3 space station. way too powerful
Agreed. When i play the consortium i can win even when the enemy has 6 isd's and i have 1 vengance cruiser and a lvl 3 space station. way too powerfull
%100 agree with u the zann con. is WAY TO UNBALANCED. *example* there was 3 star fighter sqauds at a mine i send in 6 sqauds of ties and the star fighters killed each one i swear i doubled team them and *DEAD* plus the damn capital ships can easily drain the space station with that beam CAN THE EMPIRE AT LEAST HAVE A EXCOUTER....even though ti will probably die instantly.....>_>
About the TIE Fighter thing, didn't the Starvipers use Buzz Droids? I think it is pretty balanced, the Consortium's big ships have specific hardpoints which allow their powerful weapons. If you just destroy the Keldabe's Special Weapon hardpoint, it can no longer use its ability. Same with the Aggressor. Blow up its two SW hardpoints and it is comp0letely useless.
Yeah, well the Keldabe has way more turbolasers and ion cannons than an ISD.
Agree that the consortium is a way too strong compared to the other factions.
Consortium = imba.
Plain and simple.
Besides when I first started out, I have never lost a battle using the corrupt side no matter what the odds.