Campers -1 reply

  • 1
  • 2

Please wait...

thehornedrat

Pro-Filer thinks I'm cool!!

50 XP

5th November 2002

0 Uploads

387 Posts

0 Threads

#11 16 years ago

Well as defence is a different challenge from assualt,

Have you ever been the last defender against 3 assualt players knowing their sniper is still alive and that yours is dead I can assure you no walk in the park is it and even on bridge there is no place to hide after all you can get nade'd if u r in the tower and if you never look at the assualt walk past.

The only way to honor camp is to have a good side and then you can do on either defense or assualt.




Airborne82nd

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

27th December 2002

0 Uploads

10 Posts

0 Threads

#12 16 years ago

I just would rather push forward than sit and wait for the enemy to come to me.




valor_dragon

Dread thinks I'm a special person

50 XP

17th December 2002

0 Uploads

330 Posts

0 Threads

#13 16 years ago

That is what im talking about. You rather not be a pussy and go look for e then wait for enemy to come. You got a better advantage when you go look for e. Even If im on defense i just go look for e. Get a lot of kills doing it that way.




thehornedrat

Pro-Filer thinks I'm cool!!

50 XP

5th November 2002

0 Uploads

387 Posts

0 Threads

#14 16 years ago

I'm not saying there is no place for looking for enemy just that somebody has to watch for outflanking moves and such, If this was real life (which it ain't although a virtual pain machine would be funny!) and you were ordered to defend an objective the last thing you would do is go look for someone to fight.

Part of thr prob with games like this is there is no problem with dying or leaving team mates to die because you rushed straight into a nade (something I seem good at).

The reason camper is now a banned word is because it puts a negative spin on a valid and sometimes good tactic. How often do assualts wait for a min or two before rushing.

If assualt wait long enough they can kill a lot of the D that get bored and rush, I know I would do that if the oppurtunity arose wait let D come to me and then when they are diadvantaged you snipe/nade them.




Duece78

Slightly cooler than a n00b

50 XP

19th August 2002

0 Uploads

28 Posts

0 Threads

#15 16 years ago

1st of all defence is not for honor p horders,without defence there is no assault,i dont get why this subject comes up all the time i mean i can understand getting a little frustrated if an assaulter is camped out in one spot and doesnt go for the objectives,but you have to realize some people play different,maybe his objective in the game is not to die(which should be the point cause if you dont die and rush and do stupid things you would complete your objectives).If there is anything i hate about this game its the rambo rushers i mean how realistic is that,i mean yeah sure you get some kills but usually always die first.this game is all about tactics and team work,try it i promise you it works.




thehornedrat

Pro-Filer thinks I'm cool!!

50 XP

5th November 2002

0 Uploads

387 Posts

0 Threads

#16 16 years ago

couldn't agree more, however some will always disagree and say it's better to rush and kill 3 and then die cause they have achieved the objective set of trying to kill all opposition.

All we need is a virtual pain simulator whereby you get realistic pain for being shot then see how many of these people rambo and how many then hang back and try to pick off opposition more safely.




  • 1
  • 2