ROE question -1 reply

Please wait...

s2ua7

Sealab Slacker

50 XP

5th September 2002

0 Uploads

362 Posts

0 Threads

#1 16 years ago

Ok.. I think its pretty sick that we can get ROE from shooting the non-combatants in Radio Tower... But I got to looking when I was selecting Assault or Defence on some other maps and some of them actually said part of the the Rules of Engagement(ROE for thos who dont know) is that you have to minimize damage to structures(I know that on pipeline it says that). Now how come we can 203 and nade the structures and not get any ROE?? I think it would be a good chalange for most people and once you made it inside the building, it would be fairly even match. Because I know I use some of the structures to launch 203 rounds inside the building and even when I am on Defence... Just thought I would ask :)




Ghostmachine0

I don't spend enough time here

50 XP

17th October 2002

0 Uploads

28 Posts

0 Threads

#2 16 years ago

getting roe for shooting nocoms in RT dosn't fit with not getting roe for structural damage in pipeline or bridge. i think it would be cool if u got roe penaltys for throwing to many nades indors in pieline or shooting the 203 in the tunnels. it would incrase the difficulty and fun on any map.




s2ua7

Sealab Slacker

50 XP

5th September 2002

0 Uploads

362 Posts

0 Threads

#3 16 years ago

yea.. thats what I am talking about.. I am tired of people nading the same spot (Primary for example... why not just have a few people guard there). I think excessive nading is for n00bs... Majority of the time I only end up using one... maybe 2 of the frags and thats it.. I actually like flashbangs the most...




StuG44

I don't spend enough time here

50 XP

10th April 2003

0 Uploads

16 Posts

0 Threads

#4 16 years ago

Speaking of ROE, is there any way to accumulate a -84 ROE on mountain assault (no civs that I know of) in 3 rounds, WITHOUT "friendly fire?"

I guess it's theoretically possible that I zoned out for a few seconds, during the course of my firing at a target that didn't resemble US forces in the least, and didn't notice either the audible or onscreen text friendly fire message, but it's never happened before.

If anyone has an explanation of how I could've gotten that score without friendly/civ fire, or if anyone else has experienced the same baffling scenario, I'd like to hear from you.




s2ua7

Sealab Slacker

50 XP

5th September 2002

0 Uploads

362 Posts

0 Threads

#5 16 years ago

Its not possible if it wasnt friendly fire. Because the Non-Com's in Radio Tower are the first "things" that you can get ROE for that are not on your own team... I dont know if things are the right words I was looking for but they arnt players....




thehornedrat

Pro-Filer thinks I'm cool!!

50 XP

5th November 2002

0 Uploads

387 Posts

0 Threads

#6 16 years ago

I agree regardihng ROE for 203 on damaging things, would be funny if you couldn't 203 into the building on bridge, defensive camper field day cause if the 203 cant hit it generally you can stay in the window area and shoot till your hearts content :)




dead_fred

Kool Aid man for hire

50 XP

4th December 2002

0 Uploads

342 Posts

0 Threads

#7 16 years ago

i have gotten minimal ROE (from 4-80) for...getting flashed, killing an opfor, getting an objective, falling off bridge...there have been times where i am doing nothing wrong, not shooting friends and stuff, and then i end up with a little ROE. i think its just some kind of scoring bug or something. it might not even reflect on your real score, just the board...who really cares if its not constantly doing it and if its just a little bit.