Simple Poll. Should Artillery Be Added?
GF Pwns Me!
29th November 2002
I think that it would be cool but then you would have to add at least a gig of hard drive space to make it run. How would you then get rid of the artillery shooting at you if yours was destroyed and who would shoot them? Good idea though.
Kool Aid man for hire
4th December 2002
i dont think so, it would take alot of space (maybe they can prove me wrong) and some people (myself included) have enough problems with the m203 and just [plain staying allive:D
Pro-Filer thinks I'm cool!!
5th November 2002
Seems a good idea but will require good teamwork to be effective
Also what about ROE for long range shots where some rambo runs into the target area?
perhaps then sidearms such as the pistol will be used by the artillery people to defend themselves? if not they will get shot by anyone running close.
Artillery would be awesome, with the new code drop in 1.5 it may be possible. :rock:
Well coordinated artillery strikes do require alot of teamwork. If some retard ran into the artillery strike zone, then no ROE should be given, because he would have known where the strike would land.
In real life however, artillery strikes have hit friendly forces on numerous occasions...
Yehp I totally agree, if a team mate runs into the area of the air strike it will be his fault. Other wise it would be far too easy to give someone you hate roe. :rock:
Artillery is usually shot from VERY VERY far away....I don't think players in the game should be involved in actually firing the artillery...maybe just to relay coordinates.
However, if some retard relays coordinates to fire directly on friendly forces...this is confusing! :confused:
lol, I guess it could be. But it should at least be tried and given to the beta testers.