Mas stylie por favor...
13th April 2005
If this story is true and they want to fire a missile pointed at Hawaii, I want that thing shot down. I dont care if it cant possibly reach us. I dont care if that thing cant make it 1000 miles. And I dont care what they feel like saying or bellowing about. Time to call a bluff. My Way News - Report: NKorea plans to fire missile toward Hawaii Report: NKorea plans to fire missile toward Hawaii :eMail_Friend(540, 540);"">:eMail_Friend(540, 540);"">Email this Story Jun 18, 6:22 AM (ET) By HYUNG-JIN KIM (AP) A South Korean soldier mans a weapon atop a military vehicle during a military drill against... Full Image [COLOR=black]SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - North Korea may fire a long-range ballistic missile toward Hawaii in early July, a Japanese news report said Thursday, as Russia and China urged the regime to return to international disarmament talks on its rogue nuclear program. [/COLOR] [COLOR=black]The missile, believed to be a Taepodong-2 with a range of up to 4,000 miles (6,500 kilometers), would be launched from North Korea's Dongchang-ni site on the northwestern coast, said the Yomiuri daily, Japan's top-selling newspaper. It cited an analysis by the Japanese Defense Ministry and intelligence gathered by U.S. reconnaissance satellites. [/COLOR] [COLOR=black]The missile launch could come between July 4 and 8, the paper said. [/COLOR] [COLOR=black]While the newspaper speculated the Taepodong-2 could fly over Japan and toward Hawaii, it said the missile would not be able to hit Hawaii's main islands, which are about 4,500 miles (7,200 kilometers) from the Korean peninsula. [/COLOR] [COLOR=black](AP) A child walks past pictures of North Korean leader Kim Jong Il at a unification observation post... [COLOR=black]Full Image[/COLOR] A spokesman for the Japanese Defense Ministry declined to comment on the report. South Korea's Defense Ministry and the National Intelligence Service - the country's main spy agency - said they could not confirm it. Tension on the divided Korean peninsula has spiked since the North conducted its second nuclear test on May 25 in defiance of repeated international warnings. The regime declared Saturday it would bolster its nuclear programs and threatened war in protest of U.N. sanctions taken for the nuclear test. U.S. officials have said the North has been preparing to fire a long-range missile capable of striking the western U.S. In Washington on Tuesday, Gen. James Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said it would take at least three to five years for North Korea to pose a real threat to the U.S. west coast. President Barack Obama and South Korean President Lee Myung-bak met in Washington on Tuesday for a landmark summit in which they agreed to build a regional and global "strategic alliance" to persuade North Korea to dismantle all its nuclear weapons. Obama declared North Korea a "grave threat" to the world and pledged that the new U.N. sanctions on the communist regime will be aggressively enforced. In Seoul, Vice Unification Minister Hong Yang-ho told a forum Thursday that the North's moves to strengthen its nuclear programs is "a very dangerous thing that can fundamentally change" the regional security environment. He said the South Korean government is bracing for "all possible scenarios" regarding the nuclear standoff. (AP) A visitor looks at a collage made of pictures of North Korean leader Kim Jong Il at a unification... Full Image The independent International Crisis Group think tank, meanwhile, said the North's massive stockpile of chemical weapons is no less serious a threat to the region than its nuclear arsenal. It said the North is believed to have between 2,500 and 5,000 tons of chemical weapons, including mustard gas, phosgene, blood agents and sarin. These weapons can be delivered with ballistic missiles and long-range artillery and are "sufficient to inflict massive civilian casualties on South Korea." "If progress is made on rolling back Pyongyang's nuclear ambitions, there could be opportunities to construct a cooperative diplomatic solution for chemical weapons and the suspected biological weapons program," the think tank said in a report released Thursday. It also called on the U.S. to engage the North in dialogue to defuse the nuclear crisis, saying "diplomacy is the least bad option." The think tank said Washington should be prepared to send a high-level special envoy to Pyongyang to resolve the tension. In a rare move, leaders of Russia and China used their meetings in Moscow on Wednesday to pressure the North to return to the nuclear talks and expressed "serious concerns" about tension on the Korean peninsula. (AP) A visitor looks at a picture of a North Korean soldier in Panmunjom displayed at a peace museum... Full Image The joint appeal appeared to be a signal that Moscow and Beijing are growing impatient with Pyongyang's stubbornness. Northeastern China and Russia's Far East both border North Korea, and Pyongyang's unpredictable actions have raised concern in both countries. After meetings at the Kremlin, Chinese President Hu Jintao joined Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in urging a peaceful resolution of the Korean standoff and the "swiftest renewal" of the now-frozen talks involving their countries as well as North and South Korea, Japan and the United States. "Russia and China are ready to foster the lowering of tension in Northeast Asia and call for the continuation of efforts by all sides to resolve disagreements through peaceful means, through dialogue and consultations," their statement said. The comments - contained in a lengthy statement that discussed other global issues - included no new initiatives, but it appeared to be carefully worded to avoid provoking Pyongyang. In remarks after their meetings, Medvedev made only a brief reference to North Korea, and Hu did not mention it. South Korea's Lee said Wednesday in Washington that was essential for China and Russia to "actively cooperate" in getting the North to give up its nuclear program, suggesting the North's bombs program may trigger a regional arms race. "If we acknowledge North Korea possessing nuclear programs, other non-nuclear countries in Northeast Asia would be tempted to possess nuclear weapons and this would not be helpful for stability in Northeast Asia," Lee said in a meeting with former U.S. officials and Korea experts, according to his office. --- Associated Press writers Shino Yuasa in Tokyo, Jae-soon Chang and Ji-youn Oh in Seoul and Mike Eckel in Moscow contributed to this report. [/COLOR]
7th December 2003
Isn't that what they always try to do?
I think before the last test Japan already announced that they'll shoot down anything entering their airspace (which is probably a good idea considering that the debris of failed test missiles is actually a threat to their people).
Of course NK answered that they'll consider that an act of war. But those guys consider pretty much anything an act of war and officially they are still at war.
If a missile is headed for anywhere near US territory it should be shot down, instead of waiting around to see if has a warhead or not.
All your base are belong to FH
27th April 2003
Don't dare to shoot down the missiles of The Dear Leader
aka Killed in First Minute
21st October 2005
The Taepodong-2 is an ICBM with a range of up to 10,000 miles, making it a long range ICBM. I do not think that the technology exists to shoot it down.
You might very well think that
21st February 2004
Produced east of Berlin? That's no shape to be in! But made west of Bonn? You're sorted, my son.
Ah, the joys of the days when anything produced by anyone in the Eastern hemisphere could be counted on to fall apart the second it was required to do anything useful.
Seriously though, if Kim is allowed his songs and dances every six months when he sends a firework into the big blue, why not let Obama get a little limelight by whacking one out of the air? Everybody wins.
It's Happy Fun Ball!;4923369The Taepodong-2 is an ICBM with a range of up to 10,000 miles, making it a long range ICBM. I do not think that the technology exists to shoot it down.
The technology exists and is currently deployed, both aboard warships (The Standard SM-3) and the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense System currently active at Fort Greely, Alaska and Vandenberg AFB, California.
I say shoot it down if possible, if only to troll the hell out of them.
26th July 2004
To be perfectly honest this sounds like propaganda to get the population whipped up into a "Oh my god we have to invade North Korea!!" fervor.