"Raising dead topics"? -1 reply

  • 1
  • 2

Please wait...

Wonder[FIN]

The Internet ends at GF

50 XP

1st October 2003

0 Uploads

137 Posts

0 Threads

#1 13 years ago

Did I miss something reading the forum rules? Since when has it been forbidden to post in an existing topic? I was under the impression that you're supposed to use the search feature to see if your discussion already exists rather than creating a new thread about something that's already being/been discussed!

Okay, so it has been several weeks since the last post on that topic, but is that a reason to start a new thread, since I haven't expressed my opinion/idea about the matter?




Komrad_B

Score Monkey

45,850 XP

2nd September 2004

0 Uploads

4,500 Posts

0 Threads

#2 13 years ago

It depends... Sometimes a jackass bring back a 6 month thread only to say that he agrees... or worse to say something that is completely useless. A good undead thread would be one that as a reason to be raised, wich is rare.




shappenfit

sh*t happens, f*ck it

50 XP

11th January 2005

0 Uploads

666 Posts

0 Threads

#3 13 years ago

yeahthat.gif it all depends on what input you put into the thread. saying spam and "i agree/disagree" isnt worth reviving a thread for.




Wonder[FIN]

The Internet ends at GF

50 XP

1st October 2003

0 Uploads

137 Posts

0 Threads

#4 13 years ago

But what about proving a point as to why to agree/disagree with something with the slight chance that people might think about it and it'd actually affect other people's opinions?




shappenfit

sh*t happens, f*ck it

50 XP

11th January 2005

0 Uploads

666 Posts

0 Threads

#5 13 years ago

I guess thats something a mod can answer. ask lightning or donitz.




Komrad_B

Score Monkey

45,850 XP

2nd September 2004

0 Uploads

4,500 Posts

0 Threads

#6 13 years ago

It still depends on the age of the thread, or the lenght of it. The longer the thread, the less we want it to return (because it means it has been discussed A LOT). For example, someone bringing back the election 2004 thread should be flamed to death, only because we are all tired to talk about this. Another example would be the Galactic Conquest - Forgotten Hope merging thread being brought back(for some reason I have a phobia about this possibility), even if the guy who raises the thread says a VERY good joke, he will probably get flamed just because its too old.




judge reinhold

BOY I SURE POST ALOT

50 XP

27th April 2003

0 Uploads

2,112 Posts

0 Threads

#7 13 years ago

It's annoying to see an old thread reappear because its like the forums aren't progressing, kinda. I guess if a thread is older than 3 weeks, just post a new topic because that'd mean you have some new groundbreaking news.




LIGHTNING [NL]

FH2 Developer

50 XP

30th May 2003

0 Uploads

9,811 Posts

0 Threads

#8 13 years ago

Okay, basically, I think it's excellent people use the search function, but unfortunately, some people here can only get pleasure out of live by standing by every minute of the day, waiting for someone to raise a topic that's more than 3 weeks old and reply with "OMGWTF?!!? DUDE! This topic is old!!!1one". Usually (depending on how old the raised thread was) there will be 5 replies like that. Whenever there are 3 or less replies like that I delete them and hope no other people get in there thinking they're smart. But when it's 4 or more, I just delete all recent posts, close the thread and pretend nothing happened.




MkH^

FH tester

50 XP

24th September 2003

0 Uploads

2,286 Posts

0 Threads

#9 13 years ago

I don't mind about reviving old thread, as long as you have something important to say. I get deja vu feelings weekly from viewing the forums. A lot of things has been discussed in the past, no need to make new threads about those.

However, I'd prefer it if the threads weren't revived only to answer yes/no/I agree/I disagree.




Admiral Donutz VIP Member

Wanna go Double Dutch?

735,261 XP

9th December 2003

0 Uploads

71,460 Posts

0 Threads

#10 13 years ago

If you have really something to add (new -important- date etc.) then go for it, silly remarks such as "I must disagree, the panzer IV wasn't that bad, go and check achtungpanzer.com" or even worse "yeah I agree/No i disagree" shouldn't be revived. Its good to do a search, but when you are about to post be sure your post really adds something.

Also it does depends on tha age of the thread a bit. Reviving a 1 year old thread no matter how good your post is is kinda dumb. After a certain vague amount of time it is better to just make a new thread. So when you can consider a thread 'ancient' (4-6 months and over ?) leave it be.




  • 1
  • 2