Ts4EVER;4737923weird magazine, but thanks.
edit: sure that`s not the M-version?
I dunno. I just went to gunbroker.com and searched G41.
improved and more accurate version. some inaccuracies remain, but for a third try I'm satisfied.
I'd advise goofing around with stocks, finding the correct way to shape them. There are a few ways to do them, but doing them without creating a large amount segments, while keeping them accurate to the real weapon, is best.
I can PM you a mini-tut on how I do rifle stocks, if you'd like. :)
Hrm, I think the mag needs to be refined a little. Unlike the Gew43, the Gew41 did not have a detachable mag. If you look at photos of them, it does not protrude as far from the gun, and has softer edges.
The magazine has the right proportions, but it is quite undetailed, yes.
My 251 pak 40 Ausf.D needs a better render though and some hard edges to help with the shading.
Render it by using the material editor - tut below: