A few concerns about FH on BF2 -1 reply

Please wait...

[SYN] Ace

Dread thinks I'm a special person

50 XP

7th October 2003

0 Uploads

313 Posts

0 Threads

#31 15 years ago

Just keep the UAV an abstract --- call it a spotter plane, a foreward observer in a jeep, whatever you want. The commander gets it periodically and can maybe select an area (thus you could have individuals calling out enemy activity in an area, the commander orders a recon, then assigns artillery). The recon doesn't have to reveal every little detail - could using symbols on the map just to show general enemy activity.




FlyGuy45

*TRA* Spsk. Pilotka VVS

50 XP

22nd June 2005

0 Uploads

6,414 Posts

0 Threads

#32 15 years ago

i think we should still keep the regular ones people will fly mayby it could be a out post and maybe spawn people...who know




Irishmanmanman

I don't spend enough time here

50 XP

20th June 2005

0 Uploads

28 Posts

0 Threads

#33 15 years ago

Why can't we just stick with NOT having a UAV? Just because BF2 has a UAV does NOT mean that FH2 has to have a UAV. You DON'T have to make FH2 work with BF2. You have to make BF2 work with FH2.




Archangel85

Customtitles rock!

50 XP

30th June 2003

0 Uploads

795 Posts

0 Threads

#34 15 years ago

Why should we have to stick with no UAV-like vehicle? the code could be transfered to something else (preferly something destroyable...)