Animals in war -1 reply

Please wait...

It's Happy Fun Ball!

aka Killed in First Minute

50 XP

21st October 2005

0 Uploads

1,297 Posts

0 Threads

#51 12 years ago

I have worked in the wilderness with a lot of heavy machinery and aircraft around. Let me tell you, you don't see ANY wildlife. Domestic animals would be cool though. However, while horses were a primary source of transportation, they were NOT used in battle in WWII. (Not even by the Poles.)




Sgt.kar98

Back from the dead

50 XP

23rd November 2004

0 Uploads

1,505 Posts

0 Threads

#52 12 years ago
Killed in First Minute;3330364(Not even by the Poles.)

Really? I thought they... Neither the french?




Crazy Wolf VIP Member

Snipes With Artillery

277,420 XP

22nd March 2005

0 Uploads

27,192 Posts

0 Threads

#53 12 years ago

No, but horses WERE used to haul goods, extensively by the Axis powers. So anywhere you might find a Flak gun or Pak38, you should expect to find a horse nearby.




vegasdevil

Put me in a plane god damnit..

50 XP

31st October 2006

0 Uploads

63 Posts

0 Threads

#54 12 years ago

well in FH42 there were some camels in the desert... why not add a few small things in the levels, like squells or sumtin... because if you add horses, there will be a bunch of n00bs just waisting time trying to hunt them :uhm:




mydjinny

I live on Gaming Forums

50 XP

2nd August 2006

0 Uploads

1,185 Posts

0 Threads

#55 12 years ago

Animals wont be standing in the middle of a battlefield with planes flying ovrhead, tanks firing and men shooting. Animals on the battlefield should be exclusively dead carcasses - Why? cuz those still on the battlefield would be those stupid enuff not to leave in time. Animals standing there would be ridiculous, cuz you could hit them, they wont swerve and they myt not even drop dead but simply mess up your vehicle - That's stupid. We are thinking realism and joy in gameplay - not jsut 'oh,its cool if..'

Keep the Animals dead! -