bazokas -1 reply

Please wait...

patilla

I follow teh Moo!

50 XP

8th May 2004

0 Uploads

622 Posts

0 Threads

#1 14 years ago

could u remove the steel plates at the firing muzzle of the american bazoka┬┐? i think smooth at the firing muzzle would be better an example: the Day Of Defea bazoka this is a question: is was reading the manual and i saw that the bazoka's shell had 1.5 kg explosive and pzfaust 100 only 190 gr and 660 the pzscherck is this true? i thought the panzerfasut 100 was 3x better than bazoka can u explain me what happend?




Herget

The Internet ends at GF

50 XP

30th August 2004

0 Uploads

135 Posts

0 Threads

#2 14 years ago

Because the different amount of explosives: The panzerfaust had another system, it had a hollow explosive charge hohl1.jpg Kappe = Cap (hollow) Sprengstoff= explosive hohl12.jpg Explosionsrichtung= direction of explosion Kraftrichtung= direction of force hohl2.jpg Geschoss= projectile Panzerplatte= armor plate This explosion was so concentrated that it achieved 8000 ┬░ celsius and the armor was melt down. btw: you mean bazooka, don't you ? :D




terminal-strike

terminal-strike

50 XP

6th May 2004

0 Uploads

2,313 Posts

0 Threads

#3 14 years ago

The bazzooka warhead used the same basic principle though, ther must be a different reason.




MR.X`

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

30th April 2004

0 Uploads

12,409 Posts

0 Threads

#4 14 years ago

that thing is kinda dumb in my opinion too. id also love to see the blastplate and sights put in the panzerschrek. then when you press alt fire, the rockets sights are brought up and you can aim properly.




terminal-strike

terminal-strike

50 XP

6th May 2004

0 Uploads

2,313 Posts

0 Threads

#5 14 years ago

Xww2 has the panzer faust sights- its kinda neat. I agree the shreck needs to have the plate added (except for maps where it first came out and didnt have it).

One thing that was in rl that isn't in the game at all is the danger from the back blast. If anyone's played america's army they'll know what im talking about with the RPG.

Certainly the ww2 weps dont have as much propellant but standing right behind one would not be good. I think if its was possbile to code, taking some damage when your right behind a fired bazzooka/faust/shreck would ad some more realism to rocket weapons.




MR.X`

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

30th April 2004

0 Uploads

12,409 Posts

0 Threads

#6 14 years ago

oh hell yeah, backblast will kill you easy. ever seen the move true lies? some terriorist noob fired a stinger sam out the back of a truck while his buddy osama was right behind him. osmama got got blown thru the windshield

bazooka/schrek blast would be really cool!




Arisaka

Staff suffers from PCD

50 XP

16th August 2004

0 Uploads

1,495 Posts

0 Threads

#7 14 years ago

we could possibly use parts of the flame thrower code? only thing that won't work, though is how buildings and statics reflect the backblast. i saw some numbers on the backblast for panzerfaust and -schreck. big beasts. i believe it was 10m safety when firing the schreck with a building behind.




Frederf

I take what n0e says way too seriously

50 XP

2nd March 2004

0 Uploads

2,156 Posts

0 Threads

#8 14 years ago

I'm sure you could cause a bazooka or other AT weapon to double-fire easily. With the projectile in front and a damaging puff out the back. Might even keep ppl from laying down to fire it.




patilla

I follow teh Moo!

50 XP

8th May 2004

0 Uploads

622 Posts

0 Threads

#9 14 years ago

imo the steel plates at the firing muzzle of the bazooka are not realistic, i think no bazoka used that




BAM

I pretend I'm cooler than AzH

50 XP

27th April 2003

0 Uploads

3,415 Posts

0 Threads

#10 14 years ago

thought MC Gibs was going ot remodel/skin it ..