Call of Duty or Battlefield 1942? -1 reply

Please wait...

Ensign Riles Advanced Member

No! I'm Spamacus!

426,537 XP

17th June 2003

0 Uploads

39,480 Posts

1 Threads

#41 16 years ago

What's wrong with single player? Midway is fun when you are in a fighter with 63 other bots...




||PC|Gamer|Mofo||

Vietnam Reborn Mod - Leader

50 XP

20th September 2003

0 Uploads

2,011 Posts

0 Threads

#42 16 years ago

not when u have a slow comp like mine....well, slow for bf1942. gettin a muhc faster comp on x-mas....then i might love life a lil more!




de_yakuza!

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

22nd December 2003

0 Uploads

4 Posts

0 Threads

#43 16 years ago

Call of Duty has spectacular effects and great war sounds. The single player campaign is great! While yes, COD multiplayer has been done before it is still fun. But BF1942 is made for multiplayer, but yes it's graphics are aging. It's still good fun, but i'm leaning towards COD. :)




||PC|Gamer|Mofo||

Vietnam Reborn Mod - Leader

50 XP

20th September 2003

0 Uploads

2,011 Posts

0 Threads

#44 16 years ago

tru...the graphics are pretty old. there playable tho...




SirDude

The Matrix Pwns.

50 XP

2nd October 2003

0 Uploads

438 Posts

0 Threads

#45 16 years ago

BF1942 0wnes Call of Duty. Much better mods and more compatible with some video cards.

-SirDud




||PC|Gamer|Mofo||

Vietnam Reborn Mod - Leader

50 XP

20th September 2003

0 Uploads

2,011 Posts

0 Threads

#46 16 years ago

someone make a poll for which is best. i gaurantee it will be CoD.




SirDude

The Matrix Pwns.

50 XP

2nd October 2003

0 Uploads

438 Posts

0 Threads

#47 16 years ago

Let's see. :P




XCON_Faxion

I spend too much time here

50 XP

11th July 2003

0 Uploads

805 Posts

0 Threads

#48 16 years ago

Comparing the two games: CoD runs slow on my comp when there is more then 20 people on the screen. BF1942 however I can load my levels with max bots and no lag oddly enough. BF has much more and better mods. CoD has hardly any. The only vechicals you drive in CoD is the tank mission for Russia but thats all. Bf has no storyline to follow. CoD has three the player follows. CoD's graphics are good for its time. BF's graphics are aging. I own both the games and to be frank CoD's singile player was too short. Online was too slow if there was too much players. BF I have owned for two years playing many of the mods it has to offer. What I am saying is the game someone should get depends on what one is interested in. If you like lots of teamates, good graphics, and mostly playing infantry go with CoD. If you feel as if your teamates dont need to have a too good AI, want a good selection of mods, dont care all too heavily on graphics, and dont always want to be infanty go with BF1942. I dont recomend the Expansion Packs though they are a waste of time. I recemond BF over CoD, BF chances are will be a classic in the near future and BF is way cheaper then CoD :).




||PC|Gamer|Mofo||

Vietnam Reborn Mod - Leader

50 XP

20th September 2003

0 Uploads

2,011 Posts

0 Threads

#49 16 years ago

well....ur wrong. CoD dont have mods yet because its been out for what....a few weeks now?! give the modding community a damn chance u people! u had to wait for Desert Combat when 1942 first came out...




homo sine domino

 

50 XP

2nd September 2002

0 Uploads

2,739 Posts

0 Threads

#50 16 years ago

I only have Battlefield, so I'd say BF and Desert Combat rocks!