Do Not Respawn Strategic Positions -1 reply

  • 1
  • 2

Please wait...

bundoman

roll on FH2!

50 XP

18th July 2005

0 Uploads

28 Posts

0 Threads

#1 13 years ago

Currently in BF2 you can destroy positions such as bridges and radar. This is a brilliant idea however it respawns back after a little while! This should most definately not happen. a bridge can not re build itsself. Furthermore it should also be harder to repair a bridge than it is currently. IE maybe 3-4 engineers instead of only 1. your thoughts?




Nederbörd

Has mutated into a Lurker

50 XP

13th March 2005

0 Uploads

1,848 Posts

0 Threads

#2 13 years ago

Agreed. I toye with the Al-Khafji docks map and destroyed my own radar, UAV, and artillery, and some other things. They respawned. Make it impossible for them to respwan. Let a couple of engineers rebuild it nstead.




pvt. Allen

I would die without GF

50 XP

20th July 2005

0 Uploads

5,654 Posts

0 Threads

#3 13 years ago

Bridges don't repair them selfes, they can be only repaired by engineers. As for your suggestion, I agree with you, such a things shouldn't respawn, it should be up to the teams to protect them, if they won't they won't be able to use artillery for example etc. Also there should be more destroable structures and phisycaly responding things (maybe like in Half-life 2 one day:naughty:). Returning to the bridges, they can be repaired with a use of that tool (I've forgoted it's name), that's redecules also 4 engineers working with a use of it won't be realistic. Someone have to think of better solution, more realistic.




Nederbörd

Has mutated into a Lurker

50 XP

13th March 2005

0 Uploads

1,848 Posts

0 Threads

#4 13 years ago

Hmm... Wonder if we could use a repair tank to repair chose bridges. :)




Rommel ITA

I don't spend enough time here

50 XP

16th September 2005

0 Uploads

19 Posts

0 Threads

#5 13 years ago

Well, if you really whant it realistic, the bridge shouldnt be repaired at all... it would take days to repair and rebuild a bridge... something that could be done are the mobile bridges: the ones with floating rafts... could be an option...

Rommel ITA




ToXiC Hawk

C'mon! Have a brain!

50 XP

6th December 2004

0 Uploads

4,994 Posts

0 Threads

#6 13 years ago
Rommel ITAWell, if you really whant it realistic, the bridge shouldnt be repaired at all... it would take days to repair and rebuild a bridge... something that could be done are the mobile bridges: the ones with floating rafts... could be an option... Rommel ITA

BF2 isn't supposed to be realistic anyway. :p But I agree it shouldn't respawn...




[21Pz]Stauffenberg

the Wishmaster

50 XP

29th April 2005

0 Uploads

2,040 Posts

0 Threads

#7 13 years ago

BF2 engine sucks, lets use RED FACTIONs geomod engine :uhoh:




bundoman

roll on FH2!

50 XP

18th July 2005

0 Uploads

28 Posts

0 Threads

#8 13 years ago

yeh but FH is meant to be, thts y its a suggestion




bundoman

roll on FH2!

50 XP

18th July 2005

0 Uploads

28 Posts

0 Threads

#9 13 years ago

it might ruin the game a bit, im not sure, btu tanks should also be limited. iE if your royal tiger gets destroyed, the teams attitude shouldnt be, 'o well lets get another 1'.




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#10 13 years ago

A bridge/pontine-builder vehicle or a wrecker (even for repairing vehicles) would be nice and realistic.




  • 1
  • 2