Label Fictional Map Battles -1 reply

  • 1
  • 2

Please wait...

Meadow

You might very well think that

50 XP

21st February 2004

0 Uploads

3,000 Posts

0 Threads

#11 15 years ago

Bear in mind that ALL of my arguments for Sealion failing revolve around the sea war bar the RAF involvement. Sure, the men with the Brens on the beaches would do their part, but the oil over the channel would be the main thing.

That and the Kriegsmarine being pathetic in comparison with the Royal Navy.




Daisuke Jigen

Lone Gunman

50 XP

12th June 2004

0 Uploads

285 Posts

0 Threads

#12 15 years ago

I read up on the oil thing. Man, that's vicious. But for some reason, it made me want to see a Sealion map for FH even more... :o




Swe_Flying_Frog

The Frogs Will Invade By Air

50 XP

2nd October 2003

0 Uploads

324 Posts

0 Threads

#13 15 years ago

I hate the Alpen map, so i voted.... "Wirling Drums"..... NO !




terminal-strike

terminal-strike

50 XP

6th May 2004

0 Uploads

2,313 Posts

0 Threads

#14 15 years ago
Swe_Flying_FrogI hate the Alpen map, so i voted.... "Wirling Drums"..... NO !

The poll wasn't yes or no to HAVING fictional maps, it was yes or no to LABELING the the fictional maps that ALREADY exist. Currently, yes only alpen would get labeled. And by labeled I mean they would change its name to X_Alpen or Alpen_FiC and write "This map is fictionaly based' or somethning like that on the load screen. And if they did make any more of these things, they would get marked to (X_Sea Lion). The idea here is that people would easily now what maps are not historically based, especially noobs. This would save the endlessly repeated disccusions that take place on alpen, such as "Dids the germans really have...." etc.




judge reinhold

BOY I SURE POST ALOT

50 XP

28th April 2003

0 Uploads

2,112 Posts

0 Threads

#15 15 years ago

how dare you insult this community by saying they cannot separate fact from fiction! now if you'll excuse me, i am going to post a thread asking for the maus




  • 1
  • 2