need more flame throwing tanks -1 reply

Please wait...

FlyGuy45

*TRA* Spsk. Pilotka VVS

50 XP

21st June 2005

0 Uploads

6,414 Posts

0 Threads

#31 15 years ago
MaximillianWeisemannsays the one with more than 11 posts/day cya.gif The idea of adding a few more flamethrowing tanks ingame ain't so bad, c'mon how many times have you been killed by a flame tank (and i'm not talkin' 'bout OT-34 deaths due to it's maingun or coax MG, no i mean deaths due to the flames) ? These things are powerfull if used at the right moment, but often end up destroyed cause they met ennemy armor. German flametanks would be welcome on some maps, aswell as Mr Chuchill Crocodile and its fuel tank. They are only tanks anyway and as long as they didn't see you they won't be able to kill you... don't forget that.

Donutz has more posts than me and he's not a whore. I make intellgent or agreeing comments a whore is who will post like 5 different posts in 1minutes.




MaximillianWeisemann

I post in His Glorious Name

50 XP

28th December 2004

0 Uploads

675 Posts

0 Threads

#32 15 years ago

aye, among the 4 posts you've posted in this topic, the last one's an intelligent comment ;) no offence m8 i'm just bugged by your many posts and say it, how bout posting less or posts that are longer than a line, c'mon i'm sure you can do that :). Now back on topic: flamethrowing tanks are powerfull, but their short range makes em vulnerable to most AT weapons... so it's a balanced affair: flame tanks kill infantry, infantry can kill flametanks cause they get so close. Not to mention the fact that flametanks can't do much against ennemy tanks; but are still damn needed to clear some flags sometimes.




FlyGuy45

*TRA* Spsk. Pilotka VVS

50 XP

21st June 2005

0 Uploads

6,414 Posts

0 Threads

#33 15 years ago

I have nothing to do this summer but post. My Pc is crap and I can not play any games. Also the size of a post doesnt matter. Anyways,I haven't seen many flame tanks in game but I think they need a few on some maps where you can outflank the tank and hide.




Gauntlet

Dead rather than Red!

50 XP

25th April 2004

0 Uploads

4,346 Posts

0 Threads

#34 15 years ago
'[21PzHannig']I make intellgent or agreeing comments a whore is who will post like 5 different posts in 1minutes.

riiiight... Moving on: Acording to my sources the flame-tanks/AFV produced by the Germans were as follows: -SdKfz 251/16 mittlerer Flammpanzerwagen: 347 (January '44) DRA6202.jpg -Flammpanzer II "Flamingo": 155 (January '40) alan_flammpanzer-boxtop.jpg -Flammpanzer III: 100 (February '43) 9017.JPG -Flammpanzer 38(t): 20 (December '44) 02317.jpg -StuG III (Fl): 10 (May '43) 7262.jpg Judging out from this, on late war maps (which FH has a lot of) the SdKfz 251/16 would be an good option. Besides, FH needs more versions of the SdKfz 251...




MG42Maniac

A man of dubious moral fibre

50 XP

28th May 2003

0 Uploads

3,932 Posts

0 Threads

#35 15 years ago

*Sirens Start*

The Forum Police have Arrived!

Lt.General.Rodkeif please do NOT spam these forums, there is a spam forum if you feel like spamming.

I've had to remove 10 posts of spam, thats a 40% spam rate :(




AussieZaitsev

Revenge was here.

50 XP

14th December 2003

0 Uploads

1,970 Posts

0 Threads

#36 15 years ago
intellgent or agreeing

With spelling like that i don't think the rules allow you to call yourself intelligent.




Nederbörd

Has mutated into a Lurker

50 XP

12th March 2005

0 Uploads

1,848 Posts

0 Threads

#37 15 years ago
MG42Maniac* Lt.General.Rodkeif please do NOT spam these forums, there is a spam forum if you feel like spamming.

Wow! How does spam taste? (Sorry, couldn't resist. Ignore me and continue with your discussun (spelling?)).