Rate Limitations on Spots/Recons/Radios for FH2 please -1 reply

Please wait...

Frederf

I take what n0e says way too seriously

50 XP

2nd March 2004

0 Uploads

2,156 Posts

0 Threads

#1 12 years ago

Ever since Bf1942 there was a limitation on how often you could spam a radio command. But no such limitation on how fast you could spot for artillery with the binoculars. With the introduction of recon reports in BF2, there's another item which can be spammed.

I'd like to suggest more stringent rate limits for these actions.

Maybe spotters can use their binocs for arty targets once every 3? 5? 10? seconds. People who non-stop spam these make it impossible to use the artillery gun. When do you really need to spot more often than every 10 seconds?

Recon spots in BF2 are pretty easy to spam as well, maybe once every 2 seconds or longer? The less superfulous radio chatter going on the better you can make sense of what's said.

I've also found BF2's radio commands to be easily spammable. Again, giving you 3 every 10 seconds or so sounds like plenty. It's realllll hilarious when you get a commander that constantly spams one message over and over (has no rate limit).




Polska

"The original one"

62 XP

19th September 2004

0 Uploads

5,969 Posts

0 Threads

#2 12 years ago

You could also just ask them to stop spamming, as the problem lies not with Forgotten Hope, but the players themselves.




EON_MagicMan

Lumpy

50 XP

27th September 2005

0 Uploads

1,042 Posts

0 Threads

#3 12 years ago

BEcause they comply every time right? I think that since the problem lies with the players, we should limit these things so they cannot be abused. I agree with the recon thing especially, but still, it can be vital sometimes so it's probably best to keep it at something like three seconds. Some of the cases are extreme, but lets say you just finish spotting a sniper when a tank rolls by, followed by an airplane, that your team NEEDS to know about.




Admiral Donutz VIP Member

Wanna go Double Dutch?

735,271 XP

9th December 2003

0 Uploads

71,460 Posts

0 Threads

#4 12 years ago
EON_MagicManBEcause they comply every time right? I think that since the problem lies with the players, we should limit these things so they cannot be abused. I agree with the recon thing especially, but still, it can be vital sometimes so it's probably best to keep it at something like three seconds. Some of the cases are extreme, but lets say you just finish spotting a sniper when a tank rolls by, followed by an airplane, that your team NEEDS to know about.

Agreed, that should prevent people from hitting the same button 10 times in under 5 seconds but still allow for mutlple radio commands in a row. The "perfect" system would be to trust on the people themselfs not to abuse the radio commands but we all know that is impossoble. :p :(




Frederf

I take what n0e says way too seriously

50 XP

2nd March 2004

0 Uploads

2,156 Posts

0 Threads

#5 12 years ago

I just don't see the arguement where one says "Wait, I need to spot 10 things in rapid succession!" Especially with binocular artillery and voice commands. I'm not saying make it once a minute, but there's a limit to how fast you can do these things and have it be anything other than abuse.

Besides, reporting an enemy's position takes time. Is it not realistic to not have the ability to report as fast as you click? YOu might have to be semi selective about it.




SciComHam

Now with more red

50 XP

28th November 2004

0 Uploads

935 Posts

0 Threads

#6 12 years ago

Even commanders should have the limiters, have you ever played a match where the commander doesnt know how to use the UAV and is just continually spotting? It's fantastically annoying.




Frederf

I take what n0e says way too seriously

50 XP

2nd March 2004

0 Uploads

2,156 Posts

0 Threads

#7 12 years ago

I've seen matches where the "Praise Squad" message is being spammed continuously by the commander at the rate of 4-5 per second. The entire text chat portion of the screen was unusuable, to say little for the repeating-wav sound annoyance.




Real-BadSeed

Science experiment

50 XP

5th December 2004

0 Uploads

3,799 Posts

0 Threads

#8 12 years ago

bf2 has so many radio spammers because when you hit the "enemy infantry spotted" button. the built in wallhack/UAV, gives away every enemy in a 1 mile radius....no matter how hidden they are, even over mountains etc.... so needless to say its constantly spammed, so you can wallhack/UAV the enemy...if you hadnt notice the enemys red arrows show on your mini-map whenever you hit this radio command. this is the absolute lamest feature in bf2 imo




bbble

Don't mess with my Teddy!

50 XP

30th September 2004

0 Uploads

357 Posts

0 Threads

#9 12 years ago

*pokes badseed* You're C4-blasting a wide open door ;)

EDIT: I just got the feeling that about everyone now seems to find the "user/n00bfriendly" BF2 old enough and let the mods roll in before i sell my comp! As for contemporary games, I have picked up DoD:S which is quite good although a little frantic, and I am eagerly waiting for FH2 and Red Orchestra: Ostfront 41-45.




Frederf

I take what n0e says way too seriously

50 XP

2nd March 2004

0 Uploads

2,156 Posts

0 Threads

#10 12 years ago

I like the recon function myself, but I think it should only work if you can see the enemy tag and hit it exactly. That and it should be hard to spam via rate limits.