Some concerns about FH2 -1 reply

Please wait...


Science experiment

50 XP

5th December 2004

0 Uploads

3,799 Posts

0 Threads

#21 14 years ago

my only concern so far is, its gonna take longer to arrive, then i can take!


I follow teh Moo!

50 XP

9th October 2005

0 Uploads

661 Posts

0 Threads

#22 14 years ago

bottom of tanks are pretty week. i 1 shotted a tiger with a zooka in its belly, same with a t34 w/ pnzerfaust 30, maybe it deflected wierd or something. as for timers on AT nades, then why would anyone choose them over satchels? i understand AT nades are used often for rather anti infantry, but its not a super huge deal imo

Admiral Donutz Advanced Member

Wanna go Double Dutch?

735,271 XP

9th December 2003

0 Uploads

71,460 Posts

0 Threads

#23 14 years ago

Static barrels would rule IF the devs would be able to avoid the horror of having tanks flipping over going through walls etc. as in one of the earlier FH version. It would prevent people from firing into themselfs and it would be much harder fro tanks to fight in forests and urban areas with small alleys. No longer can they simply turn the turret around. :naughty:

:moved: from GD to suggestion forum.