Take away all the crap from my screen! -1 reply

Please wait...

Souljah

I came I saw I conquered

50 XP

10th July 2005

0 Uploads

85 Posts

0 Threads

#1 13 years ago

I have some minor suggestions for the upcoming FH2 to add more realism and immersion. Take away all the crap from my screen, wich includes: Crosshair: No need for those anymore since ur implementing those lovely Iron Sights in FH2. Mini map: u should still be able to look at the map but only by pressing M. Hud: I dont think u should be able to see how much health or ammo u have left. Vehicle, airplane cockpit: while driving/flying/sitting in a vehicle u should only be able to see from fps view. Most of the above can be changed in BF2´s gameoptions but I think they should be mandatory in FH2. I´ll add some more minor suggestions as soon as my head gets str8 :beer: So what do u think ?




SciComHam

Now with more red

50 XP

28th November 2004

0 Uploads

935 Posts

0 Threads

#2 13 years ago

No cockpits? BE YE MAD?




Tsunami Bomb

The Internet ends at GF

50 XP

19th June 2005

0 Uploads

127 Posts

0 Threads

#3 13 years ago

I like this definatly. Good post. Devs, make it mandatory plz!:bows:




[SYN] hydraSlav

SYNERGY Member

50 XP

2nd October 2003

0 Uploads

2,372 Posts

0 Threads

#4 13 years ago
SouljahI have some minor suggestions for the upcoming FH2 to add more realism and immersion. Take away all the crap from my screen, wich includes: Crosshair: No need for those anymore since ur implementing those lovely Iron Sights in FH2. Mini map: u should still be able to look at the map but only by pressing M. Hud: I dont think u should be able to see how much health or ammo u have left. Vehicle, airplane cockpit: while driving/flying/sitting in a vehicle u should only be able to see from fps view. Most of the above can be changed in BF2´s gameoptions but I think they should be mandatory in FH2. I´ll add some more minor suggestions as soon as my head gets str8 :beer: So what do u think ?

Type "HUD 0" in console, and dont bother others roll%20eyes%20%28sarcastic%29.gif, it's a game. As for locking in-cockpit view, it's a server settings. Find a server that doesn't allow external views, or host your own.




Coopa

FH2 Supporter

50 XP

5th February 2005

0 Uploads

55 Posts

0 Threads

#5 13 years ago

Good post BUT LEAVE mini-map please as its annoying if you had to press m to see if the enemy in front of you was actually an ally or enemy. Ammo and Health is a must




Souljah

I came I saw I conquered

50 XP

10th July 2005

0 Uploads

85 Posts

0 Threads

#6 13 years ago
SciComHamNo cockpits? BE YE MAD?

where does it say no cockpits ? :uhoh:




Souljah

I came I saw I conquered

50 XP

10th July 2005

0 Uploads

85 Posts

0 Threads

#7 13 years ago
'[SYN hydraSlav']Type "HUD 0" in console, and dont bother others roll%20eyes%20%28sarcastic%29.gif, it's a game. As for locking in-cockpit view, it's a server settings. Find a server that doesn't allow external views, or host your own.

I know, but it would be better if its mandatory. edit: it would add more realism to a realism based game.




[SYN] hydraSlav

SYNERGY Member

50 XP

2nd October 2003

0 Uploads

2,372 Posts

0 Threads

#8 13 years ago
SouljahI know, but it would be better if its mandatory. edit: it would add more realism to a realism based game.

Yes, but as i said, this is still a game. A game must be fun. It can be challenging (and that's what i like about FH, it's challenging to play it, especially on the weaker side, against the Tigers, or against an MG42, etc), but it must still ramain a game and thus remain fun. While no doubt some might consider extreme realism "fun", this will really cut a lot of players from FH Besides, FH has announced several times that they are striving to "Realistic Gameplay", not "Total Realism". XWWIIO (or whatever the name of that mod is) is doing "Total Realism"; BG42 is doing "Arcade but with historically accurate weapons". FH is right in the middle, providing "Realistic Gameplay", while still not making the game mundane with "Total Realism"




King_Nothing100

I aim to please

50 XP

23rd February 2003

0 Uploads

892 Posts

0 Threads

#9 13 years ago

I say, nein.




Souljah

I came I saw I conquered

50 XP

10th July 2005

0 Uploads

85 Posts

0 Threads

#10 13 years ago
'[SYN hydraSlav']Yes, but as i said, this is still a game. A game must be fun. It can be challenging (and that's what i like about FH, it's challenging to play it, especially on the weaker side, against the Tigers, or against an MG42, etc), but it must still ramain a game and thus remain fun. While no doubt some might consider extreme realism "fun", this will really cut a lot of players from FH Besides, FH has announced several times that they are striving to "Realistic Gameplay", not "Total Realism". XWWIIO (or whatever the name of that mod is) is doing "Total Realism"; BG42 is doing "Arcade but with historically accurate weapons". FH is right in the middle, providing "Realistic Gameplay", while still not making the game mundane with "Total Realism"

ur right, Im not one of them wanting extreme realism and FH would lose alot of players if not all if they went that road. For me fun comes before realism but I just had some ideas and taughts, wich might add more immersion if u toke away some of the "fancy" things on the screen. Anyways im gonna keep trying those things out in bf2 and see if its really a good idea. thx for comments!