Tank re-load times. -1 reply

  • 1
  • 2

Please wait...

born2lift

The forums staffers think I'm Cool

50 XP

30th September 2003

0 Uploads

189 Posts

0 Threads

#1 13 years ago

I was wondering about the reload times for tanks. Are they close to being accurate? The reason I started to wonder is because after playing RO I noticed they have real long re-load times for thier tanks. After playing FH so long I was used the reload times they have. Needless to say I get killed a lot in RO.




Von Mudra

Lo, I am Mudra, za emo soldat!

50 XP

25th September 2004

0 Uploads

7,064 Posts

0 Threads

#2 13 years ago

If I am correct, they are slightly faster, for "gameplay"....:rolleyes:




Maxa

°_o

50 XP

11th February 2005

0 Uploads

354 Posts

0 Threads

#3 13 years ago
born2liftThe reason I started to wonder is because after playing RO I noticed they have real long re-load times for thier tanks.

Do the tanks in Red Orchestra have HE, AT or both ammo? Needless to say, FH has only AT, so it would be quite disturbing to have long reload times with ammo virtually useless against infantry




Frederf

I take what n0e says way too seriously

50 XP

2nd March 2004

0 Uploads

2,156 Posts

0 Threads

#4 13 years ago

Because there aren't enough tanks in most maps so they had to make them fire faster to seem like more tanks!




schoolkid

your mother is a beaver

50 XP

3rd June 2004

0 Uploads

1,134 Posts

0 Threads

#5 13 years ago
it would be quite disturbing to have long reload times with ammo virtually useless against infantry

That is what the machine gun is for. It does a much better job, anyways.




emonkies

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

16th July 2003

0 Uploads

15,096 Posts

0 Threads

#6 13 years ago

Most of the reload times are fairly accurate but some have been adjusted.

Can you specify a tank you have questions about its reload time?




Arisaka

Staff suffers from PCD

50 XP

16th August 2004

0 Uploads

1,495 Posts

0 Threads

#7 13 years ago

IS2?

(i don't quite remember, but isn't it scaled down drastically?)




KleenexMan

Don't cry its only the finger.

50 XP

23rd October 2004

0 Uploads

344 Posts

0 Threads

#8 13 years ago
ArisakaIS2? (i don't quite remember, but isn't it scaled down drastically?)

Yes, it reloads quite fast compaired to its realistic 2 part ammo reload.




Ohioan

Not Wise Shitashi - Cheston

50 XP

6th October 2003

0 Uploads

3,604 Posts

0 Threads

#9 13 years ago

I have some issues with this. The 2pdr fires as fast as a bolt action rifle.. noted, it fired fast but not THAT fast. Its a small round (40mm) and all... but still, most of the turrets that it was stuck in were small and cramped.

Right now size of round = reload time in SOME cases.. which I dont like at all. 88mm rounds are loaded as fast as 75mm or 50mm rounds, while 152.4mm KV-2 rounds are loaded about 1/5th as fast :(, and artillery pieces fire MUCH faster then they would considering most fire 105mm-150mm rounds.. there's a lot of discrepancies.

I say larger round = slower reload, but no extremes. KV-2 and IS-2 rounds should load faster and 150mm Brumbarr rounds should definately load faster.

RO has pretty steep reload times.. and pretty crappy tanks IMO. There's no coax machinegun, the hull machinegun has infinite ammo and no overheat (you can fire forever) the tracers go through the terrain, the alternate fire is broken, no switching ammo types, no commander view that dosent turn the turret.. its a FAR cry from realism. Not to mention the physics of the rounds it fires: it takes exactly 1 second for the round to reach where its fired at no matter what distance. Right next to the tank, the round will not explode for 1 second. Across the map, exactly one second. There's tons and tons of problems and RO should not be used as a realism compass.




emonkies

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

16th July 2003

0 Uploads

15,096 Posts

0 Threads

#10 13 years ago

FH looked for and used the historically mentioned reload times, some were adjusted for gameplay.

Keep in mind that most German tanks compared to their enemy counterparts were known for being roomy and well laid out. A roomy tank is more comfortable for the crew and they operate better for longer periods of time.

IS-2's reload rate was about 2.5 rounds per minute due to the cramped interior and the 2 part ammo.

KV-2 IIRC also used a two part ammo.

2lbr shell can be handled with one hand and is easy to load, but it removes the commander from his command duties to reload the gun.

88's when not in the tank have a crew of 10 or more men who handle ammo and load it. reload rate of the Tiger is slower to reflect teh more confined yet still roomy Tiger interior.




  • 1
  • 2