Tiger close-defense system -1 reply

Please wait...

[tR]Mad Mac

Aerospace Engineering FTW!

50 XP

19th May 2004

0 Uploads

1,242 Posts

0 Threads

#21 16 years ago

Yeah, the satchel should definetly bring in some tank/infantry balance.

Melancholi- I typically play on the wolf gaming server. I signed up with wolfgaming.net; and am able to use their TS server. I really suggest everyone do this. It helps a lot, and makes the game much more fun when teamwork orientated people work together in game (using VON software).




crabcakes66

Former FH beta tester.

50 XP

3rd May 2004

0 Uploads

81 Posts

0 Threads

#22 16 years ago
-Moldie-Thank you for your wise and helpful comment.

Its not any worse than people who cant stand to not have there favorite equipment be uber-powerful..... "We should give the americans nukes! I mean cmon they were used in ww2 so i dont see the problem."




Who_Flung_Poo?

No I don't know who did.

50 XP

4th November 2003

0 Uploads

5,360 Posts

0 Threads

#23 16 years ago

Hmmmm... I hate when some people constantly cry "It's a realism mod",and others cry "It's just a game don't make it too powerful". Well all I can say is buck up and take it. Why shouldn't the tank be able to defend itself? If having the GL on the Tiger is goning to ruin your entire game, well I just have no pity. As it is I see inf jumping on enemy tanks all the time and there is nothing the tank can do. With the GL on the idiot inf will actually try to AVOID tanks instead of jumping on them like toys.




Xenomorph Advanced Member

Validating my existance

50 XP

8th July 2002

0 Uploads

2,636 Posts

0 Threads

#24 16 years ago

And the ex-pack isn't Über powerful? Besides, the nuke was only used twice, in the last month of the war. You make a very poor argument.




zero_zero

I'm sonic the spacehog

50 XP

17th November 2003

0 Uploads

363 Posts

0 Threads

#25 16 years ago

well I think you are a loser if you cant defernd yourself now in a tank you got 2 freaking machineguns on it and still you want more I would suggest you get some skills first




AussieZaitsev

Revenge was here.

50 XP

14th December 2003

0 Uploads

1,970 Posts

0 Threads

#26 16 years ago

noone ever mans the machineguns, especially the AAMG




Who_Flung_Poo?

No I don't know who did.

50 XP

4th November 2003

0 Uploads

5,360 Posts

0 Threads

#27 16 years ago

Of cource no one does. You are a damn easy target and it is hard as hell to hit anything with it unless there is no one driving.




crabcakes66

Former FH beta tester.

50 XP

3rd May 2004

0 Uploads

81 Posts

0 Threads

#28 16 years ago
XenomorphAnd the ex-pack isn't Über powerful? Besides, the nuke was only used twice, in the last month of the war. You make a very poor argument.

I guess you dont understand what sarcasm is.....




Sgt_Dude

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

19th November 2003

0 Uploads

1,025 Posts

0 Threads

#29 16 years ago
'[tRMad Mac']Hold the phone... your suggesting amping the tiger/king tiger? Excuse me while i piss myself laughing. Yes, it would be 'more realistic,' but how about you work with your team to keep infantry off your back? Have another tank follow behind you a bit. If some expack idiot decides to play rambo, the guy behind you can easily 'scratch your back' with his machinegun. The infantry is swiss cheese, and you arent damaged in the least. What im saying is, focus more on teamplay before asking for tools that would allow you to do everything yourself.[/QUOTE] You're right, how dare we ask for a realistic request in a realism mod. [QUOTE=zero_zero]yeah let's give those little tank-nOObs a break it's so unfair that a skilled infantery man can destroy a tank-nOOb how I'm ever gonna get some kills when they keep blowing up my tank? bastards

Your whole argument falls apart when one reads your signature, speaking of illicit use of illegal drugs. Try again.




crabcakes66

Former FH beta tester.

50 XP

3rd May 2004

0 Uploads

81 Posts

0 Threads

#30 16 years ago
KillorLive Your whole argument falls apart when one reads your signature, speaking of illicit use of illegal drugs. Try again.

Yeah thats really relavent to the subject to........