Faust, Zooka, Schreck and Piat -1 reply

Please wait...

Forrest Hump

The Internet ends at GF

50 XP

31st January 2004

0 Uploads

131 Posts

0 Threads

#21 16 years ago
BlistexWere you prone when firing them? Because it seems whenever I'm laying prone behind a tank and shooting them at an upward angle the Panzerfaust has a 50-50 chance of going right through it without damaging it.

Hasnt happened from prone, however it happened once when I Was shooting from a 2nd story window into the engine deck of a tank, as well as standing.




Dancingwllamas

I don't spend enough time here

50 XP

7th March 2004

0 Uploads

29 Posts

0 Threads

#22 16 years ago
tvihHmm yes it sometimes seems the 30 doesn't do as much damage, and that's silly, it should.

Shoot them in the tracks. One shot one kill every time.




Kingrudolf

Fan FH Mapper

50 XP

9th October 2003

0 Uploads

1,345 Posts

0 Threads

#23 16 years ago

I always go for the side, the rear often bugs. The front sometimes survives the hit. But the side, it's a much bigger target, you won't risk getting caught, and it always penetrates. Tricky part is, you need to aim well to hit the target when moving. 75% of the people don't know how to hit moving targets.. I can simply not believe that!




Von Mudra

Lo, I am Mudra, za emo soldat!

50 XP

25th September 2004

0 Uploads

7,064 Posts

0 Threads

#24 16 years ago

Well, in real life, the Scherk was the deadlist, followed by Faust, tehn Bazooka, and the Pait was crap.

One story form Arnhem say a Piat gunner on top of a roof fired 7 shots on varying pionts of a tiger, and then the Tiger turned its turret around, and blew him about 40 feet of the roof and onto anther roof, severly wounding the guy, but not killing him. It is true, look it up, it was seen by John Howard, the leader of the assualt on Pegusus Bridge, and is in the book Pegusus Bridge by Stephen Ambrose. But, yeah, Scherk was the best in real life, over 200 mm of armor, then Fuast with 180mm, then bassoka with 100mm, then Pait with like 40-50mm, I think....




Insane1

FH Anti-Revisionist

50 XP

7th July 2004

0 Uploads

200 Posts

0 Threads

#25 16 years ago

actually the panzerfaust 150 and panzerfaust 100 pentrated more armor then the panzershreck there were also two types of panzershrecks 54 and 43 and fh has panzerfaust placement all wrong in its maps




Von Mudra

Lo, I am Mudra, za emo soldat!

50 XP

25th September 2004

0 Uploads

7,064 Posts

0 Threads

#26 16 years ago

Well, faust 150 isn't even in game, and 100 I am pretty sure was 180mm, though I could be wrong.... Still, schreck was better as you can reload, and not hunt around for an ammo box if you miss. They should have about the same damage anyways, as both could take out any allies tank in side or rear armor in one shot, and one shot on most frontal armor.




tvih

The Village Idiot from Hell

50 XP

30th December 2003

0 Uploads

718 Posts

0 Threads

#27 16 years ago

Yeah well, the 'schreck really should be powered up, I mean, it's not on many maps anyway, so it wouldn't unbalance the game, now would it?




Tas

Serious business brigade

50 XP

4th September 2004

0 Uploads

7,275 Posts

0 Threads

#28 16 years ago
tvihYeah well, the 'schreck really should be powered up, I mean, it's not on many maps anyway, so it wouldn't unbalance the game, now would it?

Uhm.. yes it would. Since you dont play the game, you play in maps.. The schreck is powerfull enough. Took out a pantherD with one shot to the ass. Just like it should imo.