FH critics Second Edition -1 reply

Please wait...

FlyGuy45

*TRA* Spsk. Pilotka VVS

50 XP

22nd June 2005

0 Uploads

6,414 Posts

0 Threads

#31 13 years ago

ANZACSAS

:uhh: i hate you

Ditto.

Staffen makes some pretty good points.I tihnk the Panzer3 is inaccuratre do to the site(I could be worng)But are the sites really that accurate?




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#32 13 years ago

you hate me:bawl: i will do some coding if you want




{9thInf}QbanRev*E*

Hero

50 XP

26th October 2005

0 Uploads

276 Posts

0 Threads

#33 13 years ago

all the stuff about push is your opinion on a gameplay related matter. However some other things youve mentioned seem viable to me.




caeno

Yeah.

50 XP

9th August 2003

0 Uploads

410 Posts

0 Threads

#34 13 years ago

i still think every weapon/vehicle should be AS accurate it was in real life. "realism creates it's own balance" one of my friends once said, and i agree with him. If weapons are very accurate, then what do you do if you don't wanna get shot? think for yourself.




Strumtrupp

FH:STURMTRUPP4|BF2:HG_The Tank

50 XP

2nd January 2005

0 Uploads

679 Posts

0 Threads

#35 13 years ago
caenoi still think every weapon/vehicle should be AS accurate it was in real life. "realism creates it's own balance" one of my friends once said, and i agree with him. If weapons are very accurate, then what do you do if you don't wanna get shot? think for yourself.

Problem is you cannot have 100% realism! Heck we still have nametags... now show me the RL equivilancy to that. I'd just love to see the people pull the crap they do on the servers during a live-fire excercize.

The weapons are probably modeled correctly, but they are not the problems. In a realistic setting you would be piss afraid, adrenalin pumped, unable to know just where the enemy is and hoping the important parts of you will survive. The kar was NOT concidered the best weapon to have on the battlefield. When you are sitting behind cover and you know someone might have his sights on you, you simply want something that will fire MORE bullets twards your enemy. Heck you do not even care to look for him you just spray and pray!

FH is not nearly close to realism and that is good. It, nor any other game, could ever reach that goal! So we sacrifice that which we cannot achive for that which will make the game playable.




stylie

Mas stylie por favor...

50 XP

13th April 2005

0 Uploads

5,004 Posts

0 Threads

#36 13 years ago
StrumtruppProblem is you cannot have 100% realism! Heck we still have nametags... now show me the RL equivilancy to that.

sorry being a smart-ass




KrautCommander

Panzertöter

50 XP

10th April 2004

0 Uploads

113 Posts

0 Threads

#37 13 years ago
caenoi still think every weapon/vehicle should be AS accurate it was in real life. "realism creates it's own balance" one of my friends once said, and i agree with him. If weapons are very accurate, then what do you do if you don't wanna get shot? think for yourself.

...and then why does no one critizise the "railgun" carbines ?? The MG42 spreads like a shotgun - even a bar or bren are more effective, not to talk of a machingegun(no mounted) vs carbine - that's a 5:1 for the carbines - and that's one of the true realism problems.

If no one mentions the probs with the infantry weapons, this whole hotfix thing just looks to me like you want to "fix" the game for some personal taste.




[BC] Tex Arcana

Smokey Smith kicked butt!

50 XP

1st June 2004

0 Uploads

401 Posts

0 Threads

#38 13 years ago
czech speacial forcesi think the tiger I turrent should get the same turn speed as the king tiger.

The Tiger's turret WAS slow. And seems to be pretty close to what it should be. The thing to remember with the Tiger is it pivots like a Ballerina (Or Bobby Orr:smokin:). If you take advantage of that, you'll find it much more effective. I am a little unclear on the Pz.3/Crusader debate:uhm:: The Pz.3 seems to be able to deal with Crusaders fine. Just a little more elevation on the gun and you are on target. The Crusader does seem to shoot straighter "out-of-the-tube", but that is just a difference of targetting-correction. (I love the "Jearly" on Tobruk, and Aberdeen...)




Mazz

BFE-WAW

50 XP

16th November 2003

0 Uploads

1,245 Posts

0 Threads

#39 13 years ago

After reading half of the posts in this thread I really wish VerypissedoffRob or Judge Reinhold was still around. Enough said for those who understand.




Mp5-Killa

FH Betatester

50 XP

19th April 2004

0 Uploads

1,161 Posts

0 Threads

#40 13 years ago

/me immitates Judge Reinhold for a moment

"great post, great thread"