FH2: An African Theatre Mod? -1 reply

Please wait...

Anthony817

Battlefield Korea: Mod Leader

4,258 XP

26th September 2007

0 Uploads

403 Posts

0 Threads

#71 12 years ago

um havent you played crysis yet?there is hella potential with that thing!




Kradovech

[130.Pz]'s cannon fodder

50 XP

11th September 2004

0 Uploads

1,083 Posts

0 Threads

#72 12 years ago

Nothing that I have heard or seen makes me believe FH should move to the crysis engine. Sure, there are some cool features, but the "maps must be islands" alone is a reason not to port. Most importantly, if they did port, that would leave FH2 with 1 release and nothing else for another 2-3 years.

If there will indeed be FH3 (IMO not very likely), it better be on an engine far more advanced than anything we have now.




Dronetek

GF makes me horny

50 XP

27th May 2007

0 Uploads

83 Posts

0 Threads

#73 12 years ago
Anthony817;4001919um havent you played crysis yet?there is hella potential with that thing!

Crysis is a bunch of eye candy hiding a crappy game. I'm sorry, but its just not that good and definitely not anywhere near the free roaming game play of the BF series.




Anthony817

Battlefield Korea: Mod Leader

4,258 XP

26th September 2007

0 Uploads

403 Posts

0 Threads

#74 12 years ago

no FH2 should stay with bf series for obvious reasons.




mrtywalsh

I don't spend enough time here

50 XP

28th May 2007

0 Uploads

25 Posts

0 Threads

#75 12 years ago

Yeah this thread isn't the crysis thread. NO way could it even happen, or make any sense whats so ever....so lets stop that jibba jabber.

As to the guy that said that EA would make the dev team into EA drones, I'd market the whole mod as a re imagining of EA. Appearing to help the mod scene, and looking out for the consumers wants. Just cause EA has done a bad job 90% of the time doesn't mean they can't change...FH2 isn't so realisitic its just BF2 with WWII with great gameplay additions, great models, its not like the crosshair is ogne, and no ammo indicator..its not super realistic. So EA shouldn't touch a thing.




Tas

Serious business brigade

50 XP

4th September 2004

0 Uploads

7,275 Posts

0 Threads

#76 12 years ago

Of course they would change it, you cant have rifles killing in one shot now can we? Or tanks immune to grenades? Of 88's killing crusaders? That's unfair.




Lobo

All your base are belong to FH

50 XP

27th April 2003

0 Uploads

6,883 Posts

0 Threads

#77 12 years ago
mrtywalsh;4001983FH2 isn't so realisitic its just BF2 with WWII with great gameplay additions, great models, its not like the crosshair is ogne, and no ammo indicator..its not super realistic. So EA shouldn't touch a thing.

First of all you can't say if FH2 is or isn't realistic because you haven't played it.

Second, FH2 is a realistic mod and the crosshair has nothing to do with realism, I am going to tell it for 578 time, the crosshair or the lack of crosshair are both equally unrealistic, and the persons claiming the X game is the ultimate realistic experience because it has not crosshair are utterly wrong. Ok?




The Last Unknown Soldier

Never mess with a drunken Kiwi

50 XP

3rd January 2007

0 Uploads

796 Posts

0 Threads

#78 12 years ago

what are you getting at here lobo, are you saying it's realistic to have that annoying little crosshair when your not looking down the sights?




Lobo

All your base are belong to FH

50 XP

27th April 2003

0 Uploads

6,883 Posts

0 Threads

#79 12 years ago

are you saying it's realistic to loose the clue that a real person has about where he is aiming from the hip, clue because a human has a complex system connecting brain-eyes-neural receptors in the muscles, skin and articulations?

Read me again, BOTH are unrealistic, we choose the best one. Our players can shoot from the hip with a moderate acuracy, the players in RO or other games without crosshairs don't shoot like real soldiers, and the reason is the lack of crosshair.




FlyGuy45

*TRA* Spsk. Pilotka VVS

50 XP

22nd June 2005

0 Uploads

6,414 Posts

0 Threads

#80 12 years ago
The Last Unknown Soldier;4002181what are you getting at here lobo, are you saying it's realistic to have that annoying little crosshair when your not looking down the sights?

I know where my arms are can I do this ingame? Nope, so the crosshair is the next best thing. Possibly adding a dot or a one sized crosshair would be a little better, but the widening crosshairs could represent you walking and your gun sway. So, in theory this is realistic.