I must say they look fkn good... -1 reply

Please wait...

CluelessFlyboy

GF makes me horny

50 XP

19th February 2004

0 Uploads

84 Posts

0 Threads

#51 17 years ago
ManiKSince this thread is back, I have never seen a crusader or a matilda with an AA machinegun. Also, one thing I noticed about BG's elefant is that it has a hull machinegun, while everything I've read about the elefant says that it's biggest drawback was that it had no hull machinegun, I guess that's BG for you :rolleyes:

and also the CrusaderIII and Matilda carried AA mounts that could be attached or stowed inside as required (try a search on PLM and Lakeman mounts). But in all other respects your statement is entirely correct - you really know your stuff!




huskerpat

I don't spend enough time here

50 XP

4th November 2003

0 Uploads

20 Posts

0 Threads

#52 17 years ago
ManiKSince this thread is back, I have never seen a crusader or a matilda with an AA machinegun. Also, one thing I noticed about BG's elefant is that it has a hull machinegun, while everything I've read about the elefant says that it's biggest drawback was that it had no hull machinegun, I guess that's BG for you :rolleyes:

The Elefant had a hull machine gun. the earlier version, the Ferdinand, did not have this gun. That said, the model is correct with the hull gun.




CluelessFlyboy

GF makes me horny

50 XP

19th February 2004

0 Uploads

84 Posts

0 Threads

#53 17 years ago
McGibsYeh, the matilda 2 is da crappers. I think a clever 6 year old could model/skin better then him.[/QUOTE]
The Jackalx2kAlso, we replaced the Matilda 2. We're gradually removing all the super bad quality models and replacing them with good ones.[/QUOTE]
McGibsThe new matilda 2 and crusader own those skins several times over. Plus those are still dacrappers old crappy models.
[QUOTE=Ply3r_17]Yes, DaCrapper models are indeed...crap. But hey they'll eventually be replaced with good 'ol new ones.
[QUOTE=McGibs]A good vehical skin will be unnoticed if it's done right. A bad vehical skin will be noticed. just look at dacrappers skins. they stand out in a bad way.

ooh, looks like these comments didn't go unnoticed! http://www.fpscentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=72480 With the new Crusader and Matilda in 0.62, does anyone know what remaining models could be affected?




tvih

The Village Idiot from Hell

50 XP

29th December 2003

0 Uploads

718 Posts

0 Threads

#54 17 years ago

The worst thing about BG42 is that there seems to be no players for it online... :uhm: Would love to try it online.




MkH^

FH tester

50 XP

24th September 2003

0 Uploads

2,286 Posts

0 Threads

#55 17 years ago

Just wait for 1.0, at least for a while the servers will be crowded.




tvih

The Village Idiot from Hell

50 XP

29th December 2003

0 Uploads

718 Posts

0 Threads

#56 17 years ago

I suppose. I hope so. The tank arsenal is indeed very nice, would love to get my hands on those SU-tanks etc on a proper online game.




MK.

----------------

50 XP

7th May 2004

0 Uploads

113 Posts

0 Threads

#57 17 years ago
Choosing between Desert Combat,Vanilla, Battlefield 1918, EoD, Galactic Conquest, Battlefield 2042, XWW2 and BG42.

It's easy to choose considering that only two of the above mods actually have people playing them regularly (DC &FH). Of course, Vanilla has a lot of people playing, but why would you even bother?

FH soon is going to be the only mod on the antiquated bf1942 engine.....

Good. FH will be a monopoly. :)




lumpeh

FH Groupie

50 XP

24th September 2003

0 Uploads

1,174 Posts

0 Threads

#58 17 years ago
Who_Flung_Poo?Hate to break this to you BoW but DC is not porting over to BFV. I go to their forums every day and there has never been any word about it. The closest responce to it from the DC devs has been "We're looking into it".

Its probably because they are helping with BF2, which is effectively DC retail and then some.