ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase -1 reply

Please wait...

Biiviz

Eggs!

50 XP

29th February 2004

0 Uploads

3,168 Posts

0 Threads

#11 11 years ago

facepalm.jpg




General_Henry

Veteran Tanker

50 XP

29th April 2006

0 Uploads

1,699 Posts

0 Threads

#12 11 years ago
'[79thSgt-D;4599778']Would we be able to gather 114 players for an average FFA game? :p

for FH2 certainly ... :p imagine hill 107 stormed by 30 infantry !... lol. that would be hell fightings!

but too bad i doubt if EA would care for you.




saMNadine

GF Pwns Me!

50 XP

30th November 2005

0 Uploads

48 Posts

0 Threads

#13 11 years ago

would we really nice if they do this!!!




Biiviz

Eggs!

50 XP

29th February 2004

0 Uploads

3,168 Posts

0 Threads

#14 11 years ago
saMNadine;4599986would we really nice if they do this!!!

Don't hold your breath.




Admiral Donutz VIP Member

Wanna go Double Dutch?

735,271 XP

9th December 2003

0 Uploads

71,460 Posts

0 Threads

#15 11 years ago

"It would be nice" and EA don't go together...

As said "You really think EA gives a fuck?=/ (rhetorical question)" says enough.




stylie

Mas stylie por favor...

50 XP

13th April 2005

0 Uploads

5,004 Posts

0 Threads

#16 11 years ago

Not too mention youd need to accept some... I'll say it... SSM!!! Otherwise we'll have 20 people waiting for planes instead of the usual 15.




Cesokeso

The Internet ends at GF

50 XP

15th June 2008

0 Uploads

113 Posts

0 Threads

#17 11 years ago

Im in o/. It's just a try, it takes 20-60s and doesent cost anything.. so why not?




[130.Pz]W.Fuchs

Requiescat in Pace

50 XP

20th March 2008

0 Uploads

4,766 Posts

0 Threads

#18 11 years ago

Even if they asked me would you like over 100 players in a online match, I would say 'No, thanks'. Thats just to much. I already have enough fun with 20/40 people on a server :p




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#19 11 years ago

This is good. I hope Dice wises up and listens. Although. I doubt this will work. Plus, the lag would be to intense.. it wouldn't be any fun. 64 players is bad enough, 114 would be...

If they actually by some miracle went through with this, they'd have a hella lot of changes to make to the engine.




Kev4000

GF is my bext friend *hugs GF*

50 XP

5th October 2007

0 Uploads

777 Posts

0 Threads

#20 11 years ago

BF2 was originally intended to include 128 players. You never know though, maybe this is the reason they're delaying the patch, to make 128 player versions of all maps.

Remember though, a server with 128 players has to send out twice the amount of information to twice the amount of people. So the server would need 4x the bandwidth to do it. However, internet speeds have risen a lot in the past years, and I'm sure we'd see such servers popping up.

Originally, EA didn't want to do this because they'd be getting constant complaints of people getting hella mad FPS drop with 128 players. However, BF2 is 3 years old now. The average computer can easily run BF2 with 64 players (perhaps not FH2 though), and a high end computer should easily be able to tackle 128 players.

Personally I support this whole heartedly, hell I'd be happy if they removed all such limitations in BF2 that aren't more then a change of numbers. So in other words you can host as many people as you want, not that the maps should be made for that though.