Missing german vehicles -1 reply

Please wait...

D-Fens

uwe bolltastic!

50 XP

2nd May 2003

0 Uploads

4,837 Posts

0 Threads

#11 17 years ago

You forgot the Maus:mad:




[11PzG]matyast

[11PzG] clan leader

50 XP

5th October 2003

0 Uploads

3,175 Posts

0 Threads

#12 17 years ago

The Maus had 2 prototypes in total.....and they never saw combat....I think we already discussed this...they are SWoWW2 stuff...




Sgt. DinkyDuck

Addicted to GF

50 XP

10th November 2003

0 Uploads

267 Posts

0 Threads

#13 17 years ago

i think we do need more of the artillery and tank destroyers.

some people dont like them because of the lack of a transversing turret. i love em. I would switch my love of the stuG for the jagdtiger, or the jagdpanther, hell ill even take a jagdpanzer IV, as long as it has a low silloette, and packs a punch




[11PzG]matyast

[11PzG] clan leader

50 XP

5th October 2003

0 Uploads

3,175 Posts

0 Threads

#14 17 years ago

The Marderers were good as well....but I would most like to see some Ferdinand tank destroyers....I am not sure about the Jagdtigers....if realistic, they would turn very slowly and move like a bloody Matilda....not worth it...Also they stick out easily, it is like painting red circles on a KT for the typhoons...




MkH^

FH tester

50 XP

24th September 2003

0 Uploads

2,286 Posts

0 Threads

#15 17 years ago

I guess that was sarcasm, what D-Fens said, referring to Sturmtiger and Jagdtiger BoW suggested. I don't think FH needs these two vehicles that much, nor a dozen types of self propelled artillery. However, some variation would be very nice. I'm really getting bored of that vanilla era Wespe.

The tank destroyers, like Marder and Hetzer would be really cool, and also badly needed if and when FH introduces early-mid war tank combat with realistic vehicles on both sides, which is pretty much lacking in current version of FH. Elephant and JagdPanther would also be very nice, although not top priority, until Russia gets its own counterparts.

Russian tank destroyers? Hell yeah! Although I don't think FH needs every single different one of them either. Only the most important ones.

Field-, infantry- and anti tank guns? Take a wild guess.




LIGHTNING [NL]

FH2 Developer

50 XP

30th May 2003

0 Uploads

9,811 Posts

0 Threads

#16 17 years ago

It would be nice to see all those vehicles, but a SturmTiger is pushing it. It's not THAT usefull in FH and only 40 or so were made (I think). Of the rest I would like to see the hetzer, jagdpanther and elephant get priority.




shrinerr

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

1st October 2003

0 Uploads

1,258 Posts

0 Threads

#17 17 years ago

About the artillery, It would be really useful to have a battery of like 150mms in every main base, it would be great to use.

Damn some of those russian TDs have big ass guns.




tvih

The Village Idiot from Hell

50 XP

29th December 2003

0 Uploads

718 Posts

0 Threads

#18 17 years ago

Yeah, bring in the Russkies! Hehe. Could also include the ZiS-30 tank destroyer thingie, it was quite effective at killing German tanks, being armed with the quite powerful 57mm ZiS-2 gun. Of course it had next to nothing when talking about armor, but so what :D

And for the record, there were only 18 Sturmtigers.




Ohioan

Not Wise Shitashi - Cheston

50 XP

6th October 2003

0 Uploads

3,604 Posts

0 Threads

#19 17 years ago

A single SturmTiger shell killed 8 Shermans. It had to move after every shot because the blast from the gun was enourmous and could be seen for miles, giving away it's position. It could carry ~6 (not sure on this) shells. It required a hydraulic crane to load them.

This vehicle is not really necessary for FH.

The field guns and artillery should get a bigger showing though.




shrinerr

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

1st October 2003

0 Uploads

1,258 Posts

0 Threads

#20 17 years ago

Yeh, Sturmtiger doesnt have a place in FH, it wouldnt be represented accurately.