Please make this game more fun again -1 reply

Please wait...

der_Joker

Photoshop is, like, l33t.

50 XP

27th September 2004

0 Uploads

133 Posts

0 Threads

#21 14 years ago

The Dusty the German tanks had far better armor than the Allies Shermans had a Low Velocity 75mm gun most British tanks had 2 or 6 pounder guns the German Tanks had 50mm Guns 75mm High Velocity Guns and 88mm Pak 40 High Velocity Gun do your research before u open your mouth




Fireblade 666

GF makes me horny

50 XP

3rd September 2004

0 Uploads

82 Posts

0 Threads

#22 14 years ago

Yes indeed the american 75mm mounted on a normal sherman could not even penatrate the frontal armor of the Tiger I within 100 meters and the Tiger I could take out a sherman at almost 3000meters with his 88mm kwk 36, not even speeking about the 88mm kwk 43 mounted on the KingTiger. Because that gun could take down a T34 at a range of 4500 meters, And there has been no record that the front armor of the KingTiger was ever penatrated during the war. So don't whine that the german tanks are to strong. And the germans had heavy losses mainly because of plane attacks and mechanical breakdowns. And about the effectiveness of the BAR and the Mg42. the BAR had a rate of fire of only 600 rpm and the mg42 had a rate of fire of 1200/1300 or more rpm so don't whine about the mg42 is much stronger than the BAR because it was. :0wned:




Major Hartmann

Major Disinformation

50 XP

27th April 2003

0 Uploads

2,347 Posts

0 Threads

#23 14 years ago
striderx2048but the G43 and SVT40 fire faster then the Garand

Seems like you are right, a mixup there.




CaseyTheBrash

Master of the Pop-n-Lock

50 XP

13th June 2004

0 Uploads

71 Posts

0 Threads

#24 14 years ago

The Garand seems to have more recoil and bloom after firing. M1's are fun to shoot because it's easy to reaquire targets after a round is sent down range. Still though, some weapons are just going to seem better because every Tom, Dick and Kill Whore have one.