Server Admin Favoritism -1 reply

Please wait...

[SYN] hydraSlav

SYNERGY Member

50 XP

2nd October 2003

0 Uploads

2,372 Posts

0 Threads

#31 15 years ago
Anlushac11Lose the attitude, no ones impressed

Firsly, please define this "attitude". You've thrown this word at me a couple of times already. It's not like i am doing something to piss you off on purpose. But for me to "lose the attitude", i will have to first understand what exactly you imply

Since you are always accusing me of quoting you out of context and of changing your posts to say something else (BTW the admins can see when I have edited your posts) its only fair to bring this up. You quoted me as saying ""Yes, some admins are really bad, don't play on those servers" What I said was " I also avoid certain servers because I dont like the way the admins are." Please you greatness explain where i said "Some admins are really bad, dont play on your servers?" If your going to quote me get the facts straight.

Show me where i quoted you. I paraphrased the collection of replies, namely #4 and #17, under one plural "you". No where did i quote you specifically. BTW, where did i say you edited my posts either? Genuine question, i might have said, but i really don't recall if i did.

Show me where a paticular server was mentioned? There wasnt one because if there had been Lighting, Donitz, myself or any of the other mods or admins would have closed it.

Excatly, Lightning or Donitz did not close this, cause this is not a "that server has crap admins" thread, but something completely different (yet the author did not even realise that). And since this is not a "that server has crap admins" thread, then why are people replying "don't play on server with bad admin"? Why? Because they haven't read even the original post fully (unlike Donitz and Lightning (and others) that read and realised this was not a thread about "that server has crap admins"). They read only the title plus a bit of the post, and jumped to a quick conclusion (as Jingst himself admitted) [Oh and BTW, he did mention "a particular server", he just didn't name it :deal: , but it doesn't matter]

The fact still stands, if you dont like the way things are run on that server then dont play on it. There are plenty of others.

Yes, god i hate those admins that hack their Tigers, so that they can kill my Sherman in 1 shot. I really don't like those admins. A couple of replies on this server: "If you don't like those admins, don't play on that server" And as i said before: relevance of the reply - none. Not only that, it is also misleading the author to believe it actually is an admin problem (while it is not) Is the statement "Don't like the way server is admined, then don't play there" true? Absolutely! Is this statement relevant to this thread? Absolutely not. It is completely off-topic (despite the fact it actually fits the improper title) Why is this completely off-topic statement is even mentioned in this thread? Cause people didn't read the actual context, and replied to the title alone (and the title was not descriptive of the problem the author had, cause the author didn't realise the source of his problem) So my original statement, that "people don't read threads before replying to the title alone" still stands. Now please explain why you have a problem with my thruthful observation?




emonkies

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

17th July 2003

0 Uploads

15,096 Posts

0 Threads

#32 15 years ago

'[SYN hydraSlav']Firsly, please define this "attitude". You've thrown this word at me a couple of times already. It's not like i am doing something to piss you off on purpose. But for me to "lose the attitude", i will have to first understand what exactly you imply

Show me where i quoted you. I paraphrased the collection of replies, namely #4 and #17, under one plural "you". No where did i quote you specifically. BTW, where did i say you edited my posts either? Genuine question, i might have said, but i really don't recall if i did. Excatly, Lightning or Donitz did not close this, cause this is not a "that server has crap admins" thread, but something completely different (yet the author did not even realise that). And since this is not a "that server has crap admins" thread, then why are people replying "don't play on server with bad admin"? Why? Because they haven't read even the original post fully (unlike Donitz and Lightning (and others) that read and realised this was not a thread about "that server has crap admins"). They read only the title plus a bit of the post, and jumped to a quick conclusion (as Jingst himself admitted) [Oh and BTW, he did mention "a particular server", he just didn't name it :deal: , but it doesn't matter]

Yes, god i hate those admins that hack their Tigers, so that they can kill my Sherman in 1 shot. I really don't like those admins. A couple of replies on this server: "If you don't like those admins, don't play on that server" And as i said before: relevance of the reply - none. Not only that, it is also misleading the author to believe it actually is an admin problem (while it is not) Is the statement "Don't like the way server is admined, then don't play there" true? Absolutely! Is this statement relevant to this thread? Absolutely not. It is completely off-topic (despite the fact it actually fits the improper title) Why is this completely off-topic statement is even mentioned in this thread? Cause people didn't read the actual context, and replied to the title alone (and the title was not descriptive of the problem the author had, cause the author didn't realise the source of his problem) So my original statement, that "people don't read threads before replying to the title alone" still stands. Now please explain why you have a problem with my thruthful observation?

At the time Jingst posted earlier it was relevant. The fact that it no longer applies is not relevant due to the turn of events. That was what I originally pointed out to Jingst.

Whether AZson was misinformed or not the other point was this is not the plae to bring personel grievances with a public server. As was pointed out earlier his proper course of action was to take it up with the servers admins or to not ply on that server.

Truth is a relevant thing. His truth? your truth? my truth? All depends on perception.




[SYN] hydraSlav

SYNERGY Member

50 XP

2nd October 2003

0 Uploads

2,372 Posts

0 Threads

#33 15 years ago
Anlushac11At the time Jingst posted earlier it was relevant. The fact that it no longer applies is not relevant due to the turn of events. That was what I originally pointed out to Jingst. Whether AZson was misinformed or not the other point was this is not the plae to bring personel grievances with a public server. As was pointed out earlier his proper course of action was to take it up with the servers admins or to not ply on that server. Truth is a relevant thing. His truth? your truth? my truth? All depends on perception.

Riiiiight. Whatever you have to tell yourself I guess. P.S. yes, this is your quote :rolleyes:




Natter

Slightly cooler than a n00b

50 XP

17th November 2004

0 Uploads

33 Posts

0 Threads

#34 15 years ago

^ *open mouth insert foot* I love the whine about Shermans and Tigers, Want some Cheese with that?




emonkies

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

17th July 2003

0 Uploads

15,096 Posts

0 Threads

#35 15 years ago
'[SYN hydraSlav']Riiiiight. Whatever you have to tell yourself I guess. P.S. yes, this is your quote :rolleyes:

Thats original. Think of that yourself?




Nostradamouse

The Arrogant French Prick

50 XP

5th December 2004

0 Uploads

4,501 Posts

0 Threads

#36 15 years ago

Well actually, I bought this game cuz I knew a guy who was playing it and I got a good rebate on it.




AZson

Baaad boy

50 XP

4th August 2004

0 Uploads

95 Posts

0 Threads

#37 15 years ago
Anlushac11At the time Jingst posted earlier it was relevant. The fact that it no longer applies is not relevant due to the turn of events. That was what I originally pointed out to Jingst. Whether AZson was misinformed or not the other point was this is not the plae to bring personel grievances with a public server. As was pointed out earlier his proper course of action was to take it up with the servers admins or to not ply on that server. Truth is a relevant thing. His truth? your truth? my truth? All depends on perception.

:deal: Now why would I bring my grivence up with the very people that are cheating? I brang it up in public forum because sometimes the best way to stop some one from doing something is to embaress them. Yes I know if I dont like it stay out of the server, the only reason I kept playing is I wanted to see what other crazy cheats they where going to come up with. What you totaly missed is the last part, it kind of goes the same with the attitudes in this forum. I like this game alot and If you keep scewing with people it's going to be very lonely not only in the servers but also in this forum.




DarthWoo

Addicted to GF

50 XP

20th February 2004

0 Uploads

280 Posts

0 Threads

#38 15 years ago

Wait, so after all that, he still thinks push mode is cheating?




emonkies

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

17th July 2003

0 Uploads

15,096 Posts

0 Threads

#39 15 years ago
AZson:deal: Now why would I bring my grivence up with the very people that are cheating? I brang it up in public forum because sometimes the best way to stop some one from doing something is to embaress them. Yes I know if I dont like it stay out of the server, the only reason I kept playing is I wanted to see what other crazy cheats they where going to come up with. What you totaly missed is the last part, it kind of goes the same with the attitudes in this forum. I like this game alot and If you keep scewing with people it's going to be very lonely not only in the servers but also in this forum.

This is not the place to air your grievances because

1) You cant mention the server because if you do then its against forum rules and this thread will be closed.

2) You are more likely to embarass yourself than cause any problems for the server.

Define screwing with people?




[SYN] hydraSlav

SYNERGY Member

50 XP

2nd October 2003

0 Uploads

2,372 Posts

0 Threads

#40 15 years ago
Anlushac11Thats original. Think of that yourself?[/QUOTE]
"[SYN hydraSlav"]P.S. yes, this is your quote
Sigh... you still dont read.... :lookaround: [quote="AZson"]What you totaly missed is the last part, it kind of goes the same with the attitudes in this forum. I like this game alot and If you keep scewing with people it's going to be very lonely not only in the servers but also in this forum.

I am sorry, Anlushac, but i can't stop myself: :lol: :lol: :lol: :rofl: @ AZson Now, i will try to make it clear, since others want to go off-topic and in-between all those off-topic posts, he missed the explanation part by several people. You AZson are completely wrong. Admins had nothing to do with "barbwire and concrete" around the flag. It's a feature of the map-style called "Pushmap" and GoldBeach became a "Pushmap" since 0.67 (therefore you did not see it before). Why don't you do some searching and read how pushmaps work. In a nutshell: flags are (supposed) to be taken in a certain order, and those that are "out-of-order" are protected by the "barbwire and concrete". It's a feature of the map, nothing to do with admins. And if you are still not convinced, carefully read the posts of other people, namely Lightning, Skipster and Mad Mac... and try to understand why the others are ROFLing at you :D