Right, first of all, great job on the PTRS-41. Looks great. Now then, which maps will this be on? I say this because we will surely face a situation where the Soviets, on some maps, simply cannot damage tanks with this weapon. Will they get the Bazooka as a placeholder? If so, what are the long term plans? AT grenades? Crude AT mines? Mine dogs? (just kidding)
That's a real problem, but I have trust in the mappers to supply us with Lend and lease pickup bazookas to soem extend. Other than that, you'll have to rely on tanks.
Here is one simple, four letter answer to your woes.
PTRD
i dunno. what are the numbers of lend-lease bazzookas piats that were sent or that they made? Its a probelm because they didn't make there own until shoulder rocket at weapon until the RPG series and I cant find when that started seeing service (Which would be till near the end anywaY)
All nations could have some more of there close in AT weapons, but these wont be much different in use then the satchel in the game.
The soviets could get more light at guns, maybe have them be drobbable by the truck. http://www.inert-ord.net/russ02i/mort_at/index.html
Victim of Forgotten HopeForum bystander
50 XP
26th April 2004
0 Uploads
3,047 Posts
0 Threads
Their AT was massive count of tanks IRL, so ... realism but balance, mappers should
PTRD won't help at all, you can empty your ammosupply into a Panther or Tiger, they wouldn't notice.
'[11PzG USMA2010']Here is one simple, four letter answer to your woes. PTRD
Judging by the limited effectiveness of the current rifles, are you so sure its the answer?
Yeh, russian Infantry AT cababilities will be quite low. AT rifles have great range and stealth, but forget it if your trying to take outa tiger.
Along with the AT rifles, in the future they will get Molotovs (early war) and RPG42 (which are essentaully hand thrown panzerfausts) to give them a bit more edge.
But yeh, youl mostly have to rely on tanks, planes, and AT guns to deal with heavy tanks.
PTRD isnt going to do anything to a tiger. Its got pretty much the same penetration values as a PTRS only it fires semi automaticly.
what do you think of having a truck drop one of the light at guns out the back.
Victim of Forgotten HopeForum bystander
50 XP
26th April 2004
0 Uploads
3,047 Posts
0 Threads
Hmm Molotovs, are you sure that ruskies used them? Atleast Finland used them, and they were only effective to T-26(etc. early war) back side air condition thingy thing.
Because then tank crew can't get fresh air and they burned.
I never heard that they used it, correct if im wrong.