Considering the Super Mario Field, i suspect they arent bothered by odd ragdoll physics.
lumpehConsidering the Super Mario Field, i suspect they arent bothered by odd ragdoll physics.
The fun should begin when mario-jumping people get shot and killed in the air.. flailing around like.. rag dolls.
Yeah my biggest fear about BF2 is still the "arcade enough" factor. Damn if i want to play arcade games i get myself same coins and go to arcade hall (or buy myself a gaming console instead of a PC)!
I dont care how arcade BF2 is, Im not buying BF2 to play Arcade, Im buying BF2 to play FH2.
After playing BF1942 vanilla and then playing FH its barely the same game. Playing FH2 with improved graphics and finally some lighting effects will be sheer joooyyyyyyyyy.
but we still suffer from the arcadish nature of the engine. that's what i'm afraid of. that they did not implement possibilities to improve things. like the rag-doll physics - they're probably hard coded, so that hardly anything can be done to improve them.
i don't care at all about DC2, i'm not going to play that much. but i'm thinking of all the features we will not get in FH2 because dice decided it was too arcade to implement a possibility at engine-level.
not arcade enough!....are these dice guys dense? i think they should have a poll, i bet "arcade enough" gets few votes. bf42's popularity has suffered badly because of the "arcadeyness" of the game. look at the numbers playing vanilla today, compared to 2 yrs ago. EA was running a 100 empty EA servers for the last year and a half, now they have been shut down. you think they would have figured this out by now... other older games still have more players than vanilla...like HL(DoD) for instance. they must have no clue about the type of players, who play online games.
if we want arcady, we would go play unreal tournament, i want realism!
Real-BadSeednot arcade enough!....are these dice guys dense? i think they should have a poll, i bet "arcade enough" gets few votes. bf42's popularity has suffered badly because of the "arcadeyness" of the game. look at the numbers playing vanilla today, compared to 2 yrs ago. EA was running a 100 empty EA servers for the last year and a half, now they have been shut down. you think they would have figured this out by now... other older games still have more players than vanilla...like HL(DoD) for instance. they must have no clue about the type of players, who play online games.
EA doesn't care if you play the product, they only want you to pay for your 50.
Would you guys listen to yourselves :confused:
Basically EA would never create a realistic game because the game simply wouldn't apply to the masses. EA got the balance just right witht he bf series of game swhere everyone can enjoy the game, not just realism fanatics. Plus FH will change all this anyway so quit your whining god dammit.
The Ragdoll physics look ok, It'll be pretty funny to see how people die ingame.
Oh and the reason all those bf1942 servers are empty compared to 2 years ago is bf1942 is an old game incase you hadn't noticed. Newer and better game shave came out, no wonder not as many people play, it's not because these people want realism, it's because they want to play something different.