What are your favorite bugs and glitches in FH? -1 reply

Please wait...

Count Nosferatu

The Count Stalks...

50 XP

22nd February 2004

0 Uploads

2,100 Posts

0 Threads

#11 15 years ago

Run 4 Da GunWe should fix the panzerfaust instead of forgetting it over the satchel charges.[/quote]

Even if a panzerfaust were 1337 who cares... I get 2 satchels... I can blow people up as well as tanks with satchels.... Stick with yer fausts... I'll stick with my satchels...

The 88 is good but the russians have an Allied AA. The air supierioty belongs to the Russians on this map.

But the Russians don't have bombers... therefore can't do much against the land troops... QED.

[quote='Anlushac'] Some of the reticles dont shoot where pointed, Tiger seems to shoot to right of reticle and 88 FLAK gun and 6lbr have known bugs

Never had any problems with that myself.

Then whats the point of having them? Do you think the Germanas would ahve put so much effort into development if they were as useless as they are in game?

I don't dispute that... I'm saying that practically... as a game and not a simulation... one should use satchel charges rather than pissing around with fausts...

How about why the Pz4's gun seems stronger than the 88? Why all the Allied tank guns seem way stronger while the Germans ones seems gimped.

You're kidding! I hate the Pzkw 4's gun because its so damn weak... maybe people are having problem with the 88 because of lag... I play offline with bots and never have any problem with it.

Many times on Valarisk Russians at one point recapture flag and get fightyers, once fighters are in the air the bombers are useless as they are either shot down or spend their time evading fighters.

If you have a good rear gunner that shouldn't be a problem... that said I play offline so bots in rear guns = mincemeat for all.




Komrad_B

Score Monkey

45,850 XP

2nd September 2004

0 Uploads

4,500 Posts

0 Threads

#12 15 years ago
Anlushac11A 88 shot anywhere on a Non-Jumbo Sherman should be lethal. According to Hartmann that is not true. I can only throw my hands up and say WTF?

I think hartmann simply scaled everything down to make the game playable. This means you will not kill a Sherman in one shot with you Tiger.. But your Tiger won't get pwned in one shot also.

Even if a panzerfaust were 1337 who cares... I get 2 satchels... I can blow people up as well as tanks with satchels.... Stick with yer fausts... I'll stick with my satchels...

And why not make it so grenades can kill tanks? When you will complain i'll just tell you "i get 3 grenades, and i blow people as well as tanks, stick with ya satchels, i'll stick with my grenades". See, this is just silly, grenades were not made to kill tanks (obviously, even 200 grenades won't kill a tank, i know this), but satchels were not made to kill tank either (or at least, they were not considered a tank killer weapon), Panzerfaust are made to kill tanks, and they should.




S1l3ntSt4lk3r

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

27th May 2004

0 Uploads

2,627 Posts

0 Threads

#13 15 years ago

Count Nosferatu

But the Russians don't have bombers

The Russians have a MIG3 fighter/bomber, equiped by 2 50KG bombs.




SilenT AssassiN

A South African Bohemian

50 XP

9th October 2003

0 Uploads

1,951 Posts

0 Threads

#14 15 years ago

The 88, something is just wrong, with the reticule spread you can’t use it for shit until they get close...it should be more accurate.




S1l3ntSt4lk3r

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

27th May 2004

0 Uploads

2,627 Posts

0 Threads

#15 15 years ago
Komrad_BI think hartmann simply scaled everything down to make the game playable. This means you will not kill a Sherman in one shot with you Tiger..

Does that sound logical to you?




SilenT AssassiN

A South African Bohemian

50 XP

9th October 2003

0 Uploads

1,951 Posts

0 Threads

#16 15 years ago
Count NosferatuEven if a panzerfaust were 1337 who cares... I get 2 satchels... I can blow people up as well as tanks with satchels.... Stick with yer fausts... I'll stick with my satchels... But the Russians don't have bombers... therefore can't do much against the land troops... QED. Never had any problems with that myself. I don't dispute that... I'm saying that practically... as a game and not a simulation... one should use satchel charges rather than pissing around with fausts... You're kidding! I hate the Pzkw 4's gun because its so damn weak... maybe people are having problem with the 88 because of lag... I play offline with bots and never have any problem with it. If you have a good rear gunner that shouldn't be a problem... that said I play offline so bots in rear guns = mincemeat for all.

... I've caused a lot of havoc with those 50kg bombs; the only thing that takes more than one pass is the tiger which take 2 or 3 passes. And just because you are good with satchels doesn’t mean you should forget about other players and fausts. The real hand held AT weapon.




Tas

Serious business brigade

50 XP

4th September 2004

0 Uploads

7,275 Posts

0 Threads

#17 15 years ago

Playable? Im sorry, but realism would be.. tiger sees sherman first, sherman dead. Sherman sees tiger first, that sherman better flank the tiger asap or try and hide :p




Komrad_B

Score Monkey

45,850 XP

2nd September 2004

0 Uploads

4,500 Posts

0 Threads

#18 15 years ago
Run 4 Da GunDoes that sound logical to you?

No, but tank combat would be ridiculous if every tank would get killed in a single shot.. If they make the 88 realistic, they will need to make ALL tank guns realistic. So your pretty Tiger will get mowed down by every single Sherman or T34 it will encounter because the maps are to small to have realistic tank fights.




S1l3ntSt4lk3r

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

27th May 2004

0 Uploads

2,627 Posts

0 Threads

#19 15 years ago
Komrad_BNo, but tank combat would be ridiculous if every tank would get killed in a single shot.. If they make the 88 realistic, they will need to make ALL tank guns realistic. So your pretty Tiger will get mowed down by every single Sherman or T34 it will encounter because the maps are to small to have realistic tank fights.

No, I talking about Tiger vs. Sherman. The Sherman should take about 1 shot to the Tiger and the Tiger should take about 4 shots to the Tiger; instead its the other way.




Count Nosferatu

The Count Stalks...

50 XP

22nd February 2004

0 Uploads

2,100 Posts

0 Threads

#20 15 years ago
Komrad_BNo, but tank combat would be ridiculous if every tank would get killed in a single shot.. If they make the 88 realistic, they will need to make ALL tank guns realistic. So your pretty Tiger will get mowed down by every single Sherman or T34 it will encounter because the maps are to small to have realistic tank fights.

Actually I quite liked it when it was like that... made tank combat more realistic and less Russian Propaganda Film style [Ie t34 ramming a tiger... ZA RODINU!!!"