29th January 2005
Vote for the design you like the best.
DESIGN 1, Redgroupclan
DESIGN 2, Redgroupclan
DESIGN 3, Vantage
Design 4, Crumbs
Worse than most terrible
27th September 2006
[email=nct]CRUMBS HAS SOME THAT SHINE BUT I LIKE VANTAGE'S
WHAT IF THEY BOTH SHINED?[/email]
O man i does look like poo against the dark background... :C
I've corrected my images. For those of you using the darker themes, updated awards no longer have that ugly white artifacting.
OW & HS Addict
14th August 2008
Oh boi, talk about a hard choice between Crumbs and Vantage.
I think I'll vote for Crumbs though, I like the 8-bit'ish appearance. Not that Vantage's wasn't as good though. I can only choose one, so...
EDIT: OOH YAY, MY VOTE CAUSED A TIE! :cheer:
Formerly known as Graeme and Arld.
Mister Angry Rules Guy
1st February 2010
[COLOR=seagreen]I voted for Crumbs because of the nostalgia N64-ish look of the design, and also for the greatly amusing lighting animation. Well done! :nodding:[/COLOR]
7th January 2011
Gonna have to go with Crumbs on this one as well.
28th October 2005
Crumbs, nice design.
16th August 2008
Crumbs. We can put a .gif within a .gif right? I've never tried that so I'm not sure that it works.
Crumbs;5600097I've corrected my images. For those of you using the darker themes, updated awards no longer have that ugly white artifacting.
What is white artifacting?
The artifacting is due to image compression I believe. This is what the edges use to look like before MercZ updated the original post. If you are using the light theme, I suggest you change to one of the darker themes to make a comparison.