Battlfield #2 ? 11 replies

  • 1
  • 2

Please wait...

ATOM BOMB

GF Pwns Me!

50 XP

18th October 2002

0 Uploads

48 Posts

0 Threads

#1 14 years ago

i just read spring 2005 new battlefild, new engine, over 100 players on 1 game....sounds sweet . link http://pc.ign.com/articles/514/514523p1.html?fromint=1




extantrifler

FPS is my Life

50 XP

1st May 2004

0 Uploads

291 Posts

0 Threads

#2 14 years ago

Yes. It looks awsome. But I think the best part is the new graphics and sound engine. The lighting and shadow work in the game looks incredible. And the new sound system will block off sounds if they are behind something. You won't here the sound as well depending on how thick the object in blocking the sound off is. And the destructable objects in the level look really nice. You can now throw a grenade by some wooden boards or boxes and they will go flying. If it was based on the Vietnam war again, that would mean no more napalm burning the terrain for a fews seconds, and leaving everything perfect. The ragdoll phyisics aren't too new to lots of gamers, but will make the game more fun(blowing lifeless bodys around with your M203). You can also pick a lot more soldier skins. It will probably be rare that two soldiers are alike. The ranking system will keep people playing for a long time trying to get there rank up. It will finally give you a permanent reward for playing good. Now you can have side designs on vehicles. Just like the music in Battlefield: Vietnam. In vehicles everything lights up, dails spin, computers turn on, it will look great. The last thing I would like to say is the levels look so detialed, you could go to a city in Iraq and it might have the same features and it might look alike. My little preview of Battlefield: 2




ATOM BOMB

GF Pwns Me!

50 XP

18th October 2002

0 Uploads

48 Posts

0 Threads

#3 14 years ago

so there going to go with an america army like honor point system? also sounds like you'll need a some high specs to play.... if there talking about 100 people on one server imagine the size of the terrain.. i also think its moddern combat stuff.. oh well ..something to dream about for a year..lol




extantrifler

FPS is my Life

50 XP

1st May 2004

0 Uploads

291 Posts

0 Threads

#4 14 years ago

Not like Americas Army, you have ranks in the world, you can be the most dangerous rifleman or something.




Ensign Riles VIP Member

No! I'm Spamacus!

426,516 XP

17th June 2003

0 Uploads

39,479 Posts

1 Threads

#5 14 years ago

Hehe, can't believe people haven't heard the news yet, this tuff is old. :)

As for the rankings, they allow you to unlock certain weapons and may give you the edge if you want to be the commander.




NexusS2X

...POWDER TOAST MAAAAN!

50 XP

18th March 2004

0 Uploads

727 Posts

0 Threads

#6 14 years ago

This looks so awesome. Such a cool upgrade.

I'm also holding on for BF: Modern Combat for PS2. Only 16 Players, though, but they have the rankings.




MaDDoG1221

Matty

50 XP

2nd August 2003

0 Uploads

2,961 Posts

0 Threads

#7 14 years ago

have u guys seen the battlefield 2 trailers? they are hell good




Mihail VIP Member

President of Novistrana

50 XP

19th January 2003

0 Uploads

15,509 Posts

0 Threads

#8 14 years ago

I don't care for modern war..... Only reason I'd buy it is if there were good ww2 mods for it.




Exploder

Flames on fire?

50 XP

14th February 2004

0 Uploads

4,357 Posts

0 Threads

#9 14 years ago

I'm looking very forward to get it. Hopefully it can get a 10/10 perfect score from everyone.




Ensign Riles VIP Member

No! I'm Spamacus!

426,516 XP

17th June 2003

0 Uploads

39,479 Posts

1 Threads

#10 14 years ago

With the terrain damage system they made mention of, I want to know how extensive it is going to be. With BFV they said that they didn't want to confuse playerers by having a constantly changing battlefield. :rolleyes: So does that mean they will test a system that doesn't allow for a lot of destruction? Or will they make it more like Red Faction where everything that can be realistically destroyed, can?

I just don't want to see unrealistic damage terrain, nor heavily overused.




  • 1
  • 2